There is a growing interest in energy and energy policy analysis because of the gap between the United States’ energy consumption and energy production. Numerous policies for dealing with America’s “energy crisis” have been discussed and evaluated. Underlying these policy investigations have been a variety of simulation models designed to analyze energy demand, energy supply, and the interaction between the two. Several of the models used for energy policy analysis do not couple the energy sector to the rest of the economy. Some modeling efforts even assume that there is no causality from energy to GNP. The purpose of this study is to examine the structural relationships that govern the interaction between the energy sector and the rest of the energy policies, so as to contribute to the development of more effective national energy policies. A computer simulation model that illuminates the feedback coupling between the energy sector and the rest of the U.S. economy is used in the analysis. The model is used to analyze the effects of increasing capital intensity of the energy sector on the level of economic output and the efficiency of a general class of conservation initiatives in mitigating those effects. When conservation initiatives are introduced, cumulative energy consumption is reduced and sales and profits of the producing sectors are lower. Average GNP is lower and average general unemployment is higher when conservation is introduced.
This paper introduces an aggregate view of factors and policies that can influence the development of military forces in two international alliances which see each other as potential adversaries. The growth of forces observed in the NATO and Warsaw Pact alliances is taken as a reference mode. A conceptual System Dynamics Model is described which can accommodate a number of different perspectives on this issue.
A System Dynamics project for a corporate client generally has three objectives: creation of an analytical tool, transfer of a new analysis technology into client organization, and managerial development. In many ways, the first two objectives are means toward the third. Development of new—and shared- perspectives, attitudes, and behaviors among the senior executives can be the most significant benefit from a System Dynamics project. This paper discusses how the process of System Dynamics has been used to draw out diverse points of view, to test and evaluate the differences, to build a consensus regarding key assumptions, to create confidence in the analytical tool which was developed, and, ultimately, to forge a managerial commitment to a new business strategy. The author draws upon several recent applications in the United States and Europe to illustrate the role of System Dynamics in effecting strategy change, and comments on how the process is affected by differences in organizational “culture”.
In the first lecture of the first system dynamics course I ever took the professor presented a list of the steps of a modeling project. During the rest of the semester it became apparent to all of us that actual projects never follow the list very closely. But it also became apparent that the list was useful anyway. It helped organize effort, gave direction to a stalled modeler, and provided a checklist of activities to be addressed (if not always accomplished).
As a novice System Dynamicist one learns all the textbook rules and advice of system dynamics modeling. As a practicing System Dynamicist one learns the many shades of rules and advice. The latter ones are only occasionally spoken about and seldom written down. The experience gained from applying formal modeling technique to a diffuse ambiguous reality, often exist as vague mental models of the various roles a formal simulation model and a policy analyst can play in the public policy formation process.
There has been a dramatic upheaval in our conception of science in recent years. The old notion that science is a logical, rational enterprise continually adding to the stockpile of knowledge has been challenged; many now recognize that the evolution of science is punctuated by violent disruptions. During such crises, or scientific revolutions, a tried and true theory is abandoned for an untested and often heretical alternative. The new theory destroys the old rather than building upon it, and thought he successor may flourish for centuries eventually another crisis develops and another revolution occurs. Some even claim that science is completely anarchic, more a no-holds-barred brawl than a calm, reasoned investigation of reality.
This paper explores the following questions: 1.What are the economic consequences of escalations in unconventional energy costs on terms of economic growth, inflation, real energy prices, energy production, consumption, and imports? 2. To what extent are escalations internally generated by interactions between the energy sector and the rest of the economy?
Dramatic declines in harvests strengthen the assumption that Long Island’s hard clam fishery may be heading for collapse. A family of predator-prey models has been developed to test and evaluate alternative strategies to reverse the decline in hard clam harvests and/or stabilize the clam population. Harvesting is simulated as a fixed percent of standing stock and the behavior of the baymen in response to price and supply of clams is not included in the models. Five types of policies are evaluated: closed season, maximum size limit, hatchery seeding, bounty on predators, and nursery sanctuaries (closed areas). Effectiveness is judged for both the short term (ten years) and the long term (eleven to twenty years after the policy was instituted). While seeding options produce modest short term improvement in the annual value (8.0 to 10.8 percent), only the two bounty policies produce significant improvement in both the short term (17.0 and 72.6 percent) and the long term (20.4 and 66.4 percent). The results of this model reflect the influence of specific management policies on the biological system alone. A later version, incorporating the behavior of the baymen, will introduce key social and economic factors.
Alcohol abuse and treatment in the United States cost nearly $43 billion in 1975- including $19.64 billion in lost production, $12.74 billion in health and medical costs, $5.4 billion in motor vehicle accidents, $2.86 billion in violent crimes, $1.94 billion in social responses, and $0.43 billion in fire losses. There are about 13 million problem drinkers (including alcoholics) in the United States. Of these, less than 10 percent seek treatment. For those receiving treatment, the overall improvement rate ranges from 30 to 70 percent, depending on how broadly improvement is defined.
This paper attempts to explain the causes of widespread rural poverty which has persisted in Pakistan in spite of the development effort. The paper also analyses the various rural development policies implemented and explains why these policies have had little if any impact on the income of the rural poor. The main instrument of analysis of the study is a system dynamics model incorporating income generation and disbursement processes in an agrarian economy consisting of a capitalist sector and a self-employed sector. The analysis takes into account only the economic factors arising out of the rational decisions of the capitalists and the cultivators. These factors are considered adequate for maintaining rural poverty, although, the role of social and political factors is acknowledged. The study suggests that the absence of an economic force that should encourage ownership of land by its cultivators is a key factor responsible for the poor economic condition of the working rural households. Land is easily separated from cultivators and is concentrated in the capitalist sector. This concentration significantly reduces income in self-employment and thus leaves the cultivators with very little bargaining power for negotiating compensation for labor. Thus, development policies striving to increase productivity may only serve to increase the claim to income on the basis of ownership of resources. If ownership is concentrated outside of the cultivators, such policies may worsen economic condition of the cultivators. The study proposes a general framework for rural development incorporating simultaneously fiscal instruments that should encourage transfer of land ownership to its cultivators and policies that should help increase productivity of land.