The undersigned therefore present this claim and demand $
you that unless the same is adjusted and paid within the time provided by law from t
intention of the undersigned to commence an action thereon.
Dated: Decenber 1, 1981
, ttorn (3) for Claimant(s)
Office and Post Office Address, Telephone Number
ANITA THAYER
LANNY EARL WALTER
WALTER & THAYER
for adjustment and payment, and notify
he date of its presentation to you, it is the»
eth te ee Lee Te et ee) Seidel hie Let reed
The name signed must be printed beneath
69 Columbia Street, Albany, New York 12207
(518) 462-6753
INDIVIDUAL VERIFICATION
State of New York, County of Albany 83.:
Michelson
being duly sworn, deposes and says that deponent is
the claimant <n the within action; that She has read the
foregoing Notice of Claim and knows the contents thereof;
that the same is true to deponent’s own knowledge, except
as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on informa-
tion and belief, and that as to those matters deponent
believes it to be true.
Sworn to before me, this / Fg m
day of December, 19 81
frany ad CA Mer
I ANA Y MAR
, vy ‘ RY te
MO Lary Py} lie fis the Pm WALTER
Gualiqed jy Albany
Qesidaaiuy: ea F al
# OF New York
a > etie t oe
MT Be
Mivgals, By
NOtuary Risioye, IN, *i 24,9 ae J
, 1;
In the Matter of the Claim of
VERA MICHELSON
Notice of Claim Agatust the
State of New York, County of
*
i le att preys iinhuthhpuascutaiaitdhiehinbl hide here
The name signed must be printed beneath
VERA MICHELSON
CORPORATE VERIFICATION
$8.2
being duly sworn, deposes and says that deponent is the
of
corporate claimant named in the within action; that depo-
nent has read the oo of Claim and knows
the contents thereof, and t
nent’s own knowledge, except
the same is true to depo-
as to the matters therein
stated to be alleged upon information and belie/, and as
to those matters deponent believes it to be true. %
~ This verifieation is made by deponent because sai
claimant is a
an officer thereof, to wit its
‘ Sal
corporation, and deponent
The — of deponent’s belief as to all matters not
state
Sworn to before me, this
day of
COUNTY OF ALBANY
ANITA THAYER
LANNY EARL WALTER
WALTER & THAYER
Attorney(s) for Claimant(s)
Office and Post Ofice Address
69 Columbia Street
Albany, New York 12207
(518) 462-6753
upon deponent’s knowledge are as follows:
19
“eee g..
| @'clock in the forenoon of that day or as soon thereafter as
UNITED STATES DISTRIC? COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT or NEW YORK
Plaintiffs,
~against- MOTION TO DISMISS |
PAUL DALY, AGENT IN CHARGE, Civil Action No, |
PEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; 82-CV-1413
JOHN J, ROSE, SPECIAL AGENT,
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; (Hon, Roger J, Miner)
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION;
UNKNOWN NEW YORK STATE POLICE
ATTORNEY SOL GREENBERG; ALBANY
Defendants,
if Ot emaeenge eerie,
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that upon the annexed affidavit of
RANDALL J, BSICK, sworn to the 4th day of January, 1983, and all
the pleadings and proceedings heretofore had herein, a motion
| will be made at a Special Term of this Court to be held in and
for the County of Albany at the U.S. Post Office and Court House
in the City of Albany, on the 21st day of January, 1983, at 93:30
counsel can be heard for an Order pursuant to FRCP Rule 12 {b)
dismissing the plaintiffs' complaint as against the moving
defendants herein upon the ground said pleading fails to state a
—
claim upon which relief can be granted and upon the further
oe
grounds that the plaintiff, Capital District Coalition Against
Apartheid and Racism, lacks standing to prosecute such clain,
oe semen
together with such other and further relief as to the Court may
A ai ee at as
seem just and proper.
DATED: January 4, 1983
| Yours, etec.,
CARTER, CONBOY, BARDWELL,
CASE & BLACKMORE
| Attorneys for Defendants, Albany
County District Attorney Sol
Greenberg, Albany County Assistant
District Attorney Joseph Donnelly,
Albany County Assistant District
Attorney John Dorfman, Unknown
Other Albany County District
Attorneys, The County of Albany
1 Office & P. 0, Address
74 Chapel Street
Albany, New York 12207
a
TO: WALTER & THAYER, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
69 Columbia Street.
Albany, New York 12207 !
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
VERA MICHELSON, and CAPITAL
DISTRICT COALITION AGAINST
APARTHEID AND RACISM, by its
| Chairman MICHAEL DOLLARD,
Plaintiffs,
~against- APFIDAVIT
PAUL DALY, AGENT IN CHARGE,
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION;
JOHN J. ROSE, SPECIA! AGENT,
PEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION;
AND UNKNOWN OTHER AGENTS OF THE
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION;
UNKNOWN NEW YORK STATE POLICE
OFFICERS; ALBANY COUNTY DISTRICT
| ATTORNEY SOL GREENBERG; ALBANY
COUNTY ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY
JOSEPH DONNELLY; ALBANY COUNTY
ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN
DORFMAN; UNKNOWN OTHER ALBANY COUNTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS; THE COUNTY OF
ALBANY; THE CITY OF ALBANY POLICE
CHIEF THOMAS BURKE; CITY OF ALBANY
ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF JON REID;
CITY OF ALBANY POLICE LIEUTENANT
WILLIAM MURRAY; CITY OF ALBANY
DETECTIVE JOHN TANCHAK, UNKNOWN
OTHER CITY OF ALBANY POLICE OFFICERS,
and THE CITY OF ALBANY,
Defendants.
i sodiensetiaatael ntti atetaieieeeenennindineeaneinameediinidd nonin enniientarnanntentnnadianniaemnenemamnmineanaamanmeneinmettael
STATE OF NEW YORK:
+ 88.
COUNTY OF ALBANY ;
RANDALL J. EZICK, being duly sworn, deposes and says
| that he resides in the County of Albany, and is an attorney and
counselor at law and a member of the law firm of Carter, Conboy,
Bardwell, Case & Blackmore, attorneys for the defendants, Albany
County District Attorney S01 Greenberg, Albany County Assistant
District Attorney Joseph Donnelly, Albany County Assistant
}
F) District Attorney John Dorfman and Unknown Other Albany County
7 | District Attorneys, and as such is fully familiar with all the
| facts, circumstances and proceedings heretofore had herein.
That your deponent makes this affidavit in support of a
| mation on behalf of the defendants, Albany County District
Attorney Sol Greenberg, Albany County Assistant District Attorney
Joseph Donnelly, Albany County Assistant District Attorney John
| Dorfman and Unknown Other Albany County District Attorneys, for
|| an Order pursuant to FRCP Rule 12 (b) dismissing the plaintiffs'
complaint as against the moving defendants herein upon the ground
| said pleading fails to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted and upon the further grounds that the plaintiff, Capital
| District Coalition Against Apartheid and Racism, lacks standing
| to prosecute such claim, together with such other and further
| relief as to the Court may scem just and proper.
That upon information and belief this action was
commenced to recover money damages for injuries and losses
| allegedly sustained by the plaintiffs as a result of certain
actions taken by the defendants in or about September of 198)
t | dncluding the alleged false arrest and imprisonment of the
plaintiff, Vera Michelson, in an effort to prevent the plaintiffs
from peacefully protesting and demonstrating against apartheid in
|, South Africa. A copy of the plaintiffs' complaint is annexed
i hereto and made a part hereof.
That the time for the moving defendants herein to
anawer, plead or otherwise appear with respect to the plaintiffs'
_ complaint has not as yet expired.
i!
nh Saian 9
That it is respectfully submitted that a review of the |
allegations set forth in the plaintiffs' complaint will establish
that, as against the moving defendants herein, the plaintiffs'
Claims are based exclusively upon unlawful and unconstitutional
acta of the Albany County District Attorney's Office in the
investigation and prosecution of crime.
That the Court is respectfully referred to Schanbarger
v. Kellogg, 35 AD 2d 902, mot. for lv. to ap. den., 36 N¥ 2d 485,
cert. den, 405 US 919, wherein it was determined as a matter of
substantive law of the State of New York that a District Attorney
is a quasi-judicial officer and as such is immune from civil suit
for official acts performed in the investigation and prosecution
' of crime even if it bo assumed that such acts were malicious.
That based upon the foregoing it is respectfully
| submitted that the allegations set forth in the plaintiffs' |
complaint fail to state a claim as against the moving defendants
| herein and said compluint should in all respects be dismissed.
That in the alternative the Court will note that in
addition to seeking compensatory damages the plaintiffs herein
seek exemplary and punitive damages which it is respectfully
| submitted the Court of Appeals of the State of New York has held |
are not recoverable against a State or its political
| subdivisions. Sharapata v. Town of Islip, 56 NY 2d 332,
| Accordingly it is respectfully submitted that that portion of the |
plaintiffs’ complaint seeking punitive damages should be
in its entirety.
dismissed in the event the Court does not dismiss the complaint
| !
|
{
|
emer nnonnanammnnnrmen arm eran
, ! That finally the Court will note that the Plaintiff,
ean District Coalition Against Apartheid and Racism, has
alleged at paragraph "5" of the complaint to be an unincorporated
; Association and it is submitted that absent a showing of
Giscriminatory conduct adversely affecting associational ties of
its members said unincorporated association may not maintain an
{action in its representative capacity. Citizens Council On Human
Relations v. Buffalo Yacht Club, 438 F. Supp. 316. Accordingly
it is requested that the action on behalf of said Plaintiff be
i Gismissed for lack of standing.
WHEREFORE, vour deponent respectfully prays for an
|; Order pursuant to PRCP Rule 1? (b) dismissing the plaintiffs’
| complaint as against the moving defendants herein upon the ground
said pleading fails to state a claim upon which relief can be
| granted, and upon the further grounds that the plaintiff, Capital
District Coalition Against Apartheid and Racism, lacks standing
| tO prosecute such claim, together with such other and further
' relief as to the Court may seem just and proper.
i eRe T RE eee eat oe
Randall J. Ezick
Sworn to before me this
4th day of January, 1983,
Mitte !
[
| LINDA A. ROBERTS
Notury Pablic, Stote of New York
Orc iidwd 1 Algoy Comnty 8 3
Comrise Bxpres March 30, 19.4% ~
aPato72
%. i}
ee
Se
“ese tercenei nich Mt sai aaonibi lend nsneitig rs te
, a ,
Sec, E-Dsa | Problems of Feder: ! Jurisdiction and Federalism A727
tional rights as intrinsically valuable without requiring a showing of out-of-pocket
damages. Eg, Huyhens v. Dyer, S7BE. Supp. 1305 A.D. Mo. 1974); Bell v. Gayle,
364. FP. Supp. 1022 (N.D. Tex. 1974). As hudge Sanborn noted in Venable, discnss-
ing an award of damages for depriving the plaintiff of the right to vote: a
“In the eyes of the law this right is so vahiohle that damages are presumed
from the wrongful deprivation of it without eviderce of actual loss of muney,
prop by or other valuable thing... «5. ld. at 66.
In addition to the intrinsic value of the constitutional ric it involved, federal
courts award damages for emotions! and mental distress caused by a constitutional
deprivation. E.g., Donovan v. Reinbold, 433 F.2d 738 (th Cir, 1970) (en bane);
Hughes v. Dyer, 378 F. Sepp. 1305 (W.D. Mo, 1974), See ye rally Note, Measur-
ing Damages for Violations of Individuals’ Constitutiony! Rights, 8 Valparaiso L.
Rev. 357 (1974).
Representative compensatory dimage awards under §1983 are Rhoads v.
Horvat, 270) b. Supp. 307 (D. Colo. 1967) ($5,000 for unlawful arrest and 45-
minute detenson): Gaston ¥. Gibson, 28 FL Supp. 3 (B.D. Tean. 1969) (310,000
for unlawful arrest, physical abuse, and detvotion for several hours); Donovan v.
Reinbold, 4383 F.2d 738 (th Cir. 1970) (en bane) ($5,000 for mental distress
caused hy First Amendinent vicdation); James .. Board of Education, 385 F, Supp
209 (WODLNGY. POO dy (221.000 for hack pay). See also Sexton v. Gibbs, 427 F,
Supp. 134 (ND. Tex. 1970), afd, 446 F.2d 904 (Sth Cir, O71), Wright v.
McMann, 460 F.2d 126 (2d Cir. 1972); Jenkins v. Averett, 424 F.2d 1228 (1th
Cir. 1970); Boscarina v, Nelson, 377 F. Supp. 1308 (ED. Wis. 1974) ($1200 for
false arrest); Aldridge v. Myllins, 377 F. Supp. B50 (M.D. ‘Tenn, 1972), aff'd 474
F.2d 1189 (8th Cir, 1974) (810,000 for battery); United States ex rel. Larkins v.
Oswald, SIO F.2d 583 (2d Cir, 1975) (twelve days in solitary for possession of
protected literature — $1000); Villiams v. New York, SO8 F.2d 3856 (2d Cir LO7A)
(10,000 for malicious proseeution resulting in sub ontial inprisonpent —- diver
sity case); Davidson vy. Dixon, 386 F. Supp. 482 (D. De! 1974) (81500 for beating;
SoU0 avainst superior who acquiesced). See also Robe vy. Wilson, 489 F.2d 1273
(D.C. Cir, 1974) ($3000 each for unlawful arrest of demonstrators); Tatum v.
Morton, 386 FL Supp. 1308 (D.D.C. 1974); Dethous v. Powel, Civ. Action No,
2271-71 (D.D.C. 1975) (87500 for First Amendment rights ond $2500 foe false
iaprisonment for each of approximately 1200 derwoustrators unlawfully arrested).
In Donaldson v, O'Convor, 493 F.2d 507 (oth Civ, 1074), aff'd in part, remanded
for finding on good faith defense, 95 S. Ct. 2486 (10975), a jury awarded $36,000
toa plaintiff who had been unlawfully detained in a ricntal institution for many years.
9. Itis now clear that a court may award punitive damages in a. appropriate
on ny
$1983 case. Basista v. Weir, 340 b.2d 74 Gd Cir. 1965). MeDaniel v. Carroll, 457
2d 968 (6th Cir. 1972), In Adickus y. S. H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S, 144, 232-233
(1970) (separate opinion}, Justice Brennan enunciated 1} following standard for
punitive damages in §1983 cases:
“To recover punitive damages, | believe a plaintiff must show more than a
bare violation o! $1985, On the other had, he need not shew that the defendant
specifically intended to deprive him of a recognized federal right... . Nor need
he show actual damages... . Tis sufficient for the plaintiff to show either that
the defendant acted... with actual kiowledge that he was violating a right
‘secured hy the constitution and laws,’ er that the defendant acted with reckless
disregard of whether he was violating such a right.” (Hinphasis in original.)
Representative puaitive awards in $1983 cases are Rhoads v. Horvat, 270
P. Supp. 307 (D. Colo, 1967) (82,500 for unlawful acrest and 45-minute detention
(a
aed
© SSS Signa Sater rgge ren wrae
reece ag
Satgeaet) view
LOS nA ORT i ea aetinceet ee ie ane
teats Seater
on
tees
PE A SI OS NES DEERE Fe
PRO I me cnr
ye
CA
¥
. sol Sith : }
cn : Meteeg ¢
: inde fi Sable Aa * * Bese
Sprinter he * sci
i cena Le oat
BR aOR a te hay ry o aoe F eh i ee Seer : -
; ‘ ‘ , His yen's ‘ ¥ i
wx bf jee: ee rae "y i Mee re sot : ¥ , Saiak $
yt slat “ol i at ly Shiite eee sits dali i sll te he” a, las i el ll a Rancid aes? Peuige’ ue MMR iit ti
sd “- ili
i y ve ;
. ”
1548 The Constitutional Litigation Process [ Ch, XVil men, Fe
~
; $5 ’ ;
> Without SEBTavating cireun
stances”); Gaston y. Gibson, 328 F 8
Tenn, 1969) (350,000 for false arress
Upp. 3 (ED.
i
» Physical abuse, and tila fal detention of Amen
several hours); Auerbach v. African American Teachers’ Association, 356 fF. Supp. (Nov,
LOAG (E.D.N,Y. 1973) (33,500 foy unlawf\] exclusion fron single Meeting): Al. §210(
' dridgee ¥. Mulling, 474 FQ 4 IEY (6th Cir. 19733) ($3000 for batiory); Palmer y. Act, |
Hall, 380 Kr. Supp, 120 (N.p. Ga. 1974) ($15,000 for Shooting); linited « aten ey Compe
rel, Meyers y, Sielaff, 36] F, Supp. 849 (M.D. Pa. 1974) (punitive daniapes aathay. Indent
ized even itt absence of compensatory award); Campise v. Haniilton, 382 fF Su p S878 i(
172 (S.D: Tex. 1974) (same); Holodnak v. Ayes Corp., 514 B24 285 (2d Cir, 1975) U.S.C.
. (narrow view Of punitive damapyes against Private Parties acting under ¢
Davis ¥. Sehis, hat, 510 F.2d 731 Git: Cir.
olor of law):
of Punitive
d Cir, 1974)
Ch Spence. y.
Leven jn atbysegnerg $285 (;
ip 204 (D, Conn, Clean Aj
ation of the Kighth fits dieu
re effective of 1968
Amend
damages jx det,
Fair Le
ers’ En
Act, PS
1975) (primary Purpose
‘rrence): Williams v. City of Now York, 50g F.2d 356 (2
(reversing BANE Of punitive datrages Where no neo! for deterrs.,,
Mavi, SOF F.2d 554 (7th Ci, 1974) (punitive darn;
of OM pensator, daniiyes), In La Kean y,
1974). a cour declined to ir
non? on the ground that injunctive reli
Of assuriny compliance with COnsttution
1), “rior to Aly: if
1612 (1g fo) cour
eS tuthorig.
Manson, S83 fF. Suy
at punitive dany
Amen:
ages for a viol
P would he a me
al norns of ¢
‘ Pipelin, Service Co,
ty routinely aw
ivid rihts plainti
Honal rivtys
method
‘Onder,
¥, Wilderness Society, 95 S. Cr.
38" fees ins 198% Case
legate CONSE
Railway
U.S.C, &
ardes} attorney
Ts Secures] ni
Eits. Ege, Stoll berg ¥. Memb
ley POT). Pre-Alyesk Pipel
$1983 ser ‘OS are Newsman Vv.
Miils ¥. Lleetrje Auto-Lite {
-
Stittires ¢
5 (0 bnsure that
! te Vindicate their COSTLY.
+ OF Board of Trustees, ATA BF 2g TS 2d
“EPFOving the award Of attorneys? f
Pivscie Park Rites
ine Cases
Prises, Ine. 399 U.S, 400 (1968), $1983 a
0, BUG U.S. 375 (1970); Hall y. Cole, 412 U.S, ] ACORN S¢
(1973): F. Rava Unida y. Volpe, 97 FRY. 94 (ND. Cal. 1972 » a on Other
) Breunds, 488 2d see (Oth Cir, 1973). fee
' i 143 (3th Cj i
Ageuits, |
¥. Southern
Suprenie "
i Cig, 197 }); Miller y. Amusement h
Home Sites, 44 bB2d
irkland Vv. New York State PD
Merprises, 426 F.2¢ O34 (5th Cir. remedial ¢
“partinent of Cy, Pet :
Are ordiny
of Metin »
Lh
¥. Amusersent Enterprises, 4.26 F 24 34. (5 ‘ » Pusan, LOG
F.2d 646, (2d Cie. 1974). Hoitt y, Vitek, 495 F.2d 219 (Ist Cir. 1971): ang It would ay
Brandenburger v, Thompson, 494 F.2d gar (Oth Cir, L974) ¢ nd to dani sare
ACLU volunteer counsel): Class y, Norton, 505 F.2d 123 (2a Cir, 1974) (realiicayj it . + (requici
that Meventh i Htis nota bar), The applicability OF the Koy. Ab cond. 4161
Ment to awards of attorneys’ foes je 3: pra in Section C. At the Chis
time, 29 USE. $2412 is a diay
a ae i | of {
i HOrneys” fous against the 7 iteral
BOVECH Et. hg. Pyramid Lake Paiate Ty;
ute "Pribe Of Indians v. Morton, 199 Pog 005
COC. Cir, 1974), 4 sampling of the voluminous law review COMMENT On the
of attorne, s fees inay be found at Comment, Awards of Attovaeys Fees ty Leal
Aid Offices, @7 Harv. J, Rev. 4.1] (1973). McLaughlin, The Recovery of Attornes 4
tA New Method of Financial Lepal Services, Ao Pordhan L.. Rev. 761 (1972):
Le |
on Cin: £. Rey, 405 (1972): Note, 48 Colo L.. Rey. 1229 (1973)
Attorneys Fees ing Py Litivation, 48N.Y UY
thie Interest
oat rejecting the aw
\mendime
}
i>stti "
is Nosshaum,
« Rev, 30] (1973),
ard of attorneys’ fees t “private at.
fees unless and anti
line, courts may award
Ht only (4) in corm
Auty-Lite Co., 396 U8. 376 (1970); ())
4 court order: and (e) when the lo
wantonly, SsVe reasons,
Alyes cH Piped ag ! &
lorneys-pene, ah” ! Congress .
5 authorizes the attorneys’ foes in the
thsenes. of CO Hon fund CORCS, C9. Mills
#S PMinishment foy the wilful ys
singe party has acted in bad faith, ¢
Vexatiously, or for Oppre
i
;
ae thao
apa te
NEW YORK. POST,
@¢ >
_¢
THE FBI believes the bomb-
ings that rocked Westchester
and Nassau Thursday may be
the work of the same terrorist
Rroupe responsible for the
bloody Brink's heist.
The groups are linked to anti-
South African activities
through a violent demonstra-
tion at Kennedy Airport to
protest the arrival in Septem-
ber 1981 of the South African
Springboks rugby team.
The Joint FBI-New York Po-
lice Dept. Terrorist Task Force
took over the investigation of
the latest wave of terror bomb-
ings yesterday after a man tel-
phe ithe New York Times at
1:3 n.
Fbhi spokesman Joe Vali-
quette said the caller identified
Bomb in
* parently chosen to
examine
Gee |) | Se
SATURDAY, DECEMBER -18,,1982
BRI
Anti-apartheid protest
at JFK called the clue
himself as a member of the
United Freedom Fighters and
claimed responsibility for the
two bombs that damaged an
[BM building and a South Afri-
can Transport airline office.
“It's a new group to us,” Vali-
quette said. “We don't know
anything about it."
Both bomb targets were ap-
protest the
apartheid racial policies of the
South African government.
[BM does business with that
nation.
Valiquette said the anti-ter-
;
rorist squad is investigating
whether the blasts are the
work of the same groups in-
volved in the bungled $1.6
Brink's armored car robbery.
“We are looking into every
possibility, but one is whether
there is a link between Thurs-
day’s bombings and the people
charged in the Brink’s case,”
Valiquette said.
Six members of the Weather
Underground or the Black Lib-
eration Army are accused of
murdering two Rockland
County policemen and a
a
Post Photo by Kevin Cofer
gaping hole torn in the wall of a South African
Brink's guard in the Oct. 20,
1981, massacre.
Several other members of the
terrorist groups have been
jailed for contempt of court, in
cluding Eve Rosahn, whose
Honda Civic was used as one
of the getaway cars.
Miss Rosahn had been ar-
rested earlier at a violent
demonstration at Kennedy
Airport when the South Afri-
can Springboks arrived to play
several U.S. rugby teams on a
tour that was marked by mili-
tant protests.
Valiquette said another fig.
ure under indictment in the
Brink’s case, federal fugitive
Susan Hosenberg, may have
been at the same airport
demonstration and has “ex-
pressed sympathy for anti-
Springbok groups.”
Authorities were
alerted 30 minutes in ad-
vance of Thursday's
bombings and no one
was injured.
The first occurred
around 3:45 p.m. at the
purchasing offices of the
South African airline at
1975 Linden Bivd. in El.
mont, LI,
An anonymous caller
phoned three times to
warn occupants of the
building to leave. About
100 people were evacuat-
ed
Police located the
bomb in an attache case
and threw a metal blan-
ket over it minutes be.
fore it exploded, blowing
off doors, puncturing
walls and ceilings and
shattering windows.
The [BM explosion oc-
curred at about 7:30
p.m., a half-hour after
Westchester-Rockland
Newspapers received a
warning call.
Thirty people were
evacuated before the
bomb shattered 150 win-
dows and blasted a
three-foot crater.
The bombing un-
leashed a number of
scares on Friday. An-
other [BM building in
White Piains and Harri-
son HS were among the
reported targets, but no
ee
In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted