Official publication of
The Civil Service Employees Association
Vol. 2, No. 47
Wednesday, September 24, 1980
(ISSN 0164 9949)
announced by union for
performance evaluation
ALBANY — In an effort to head off the problems
that plagued the first cycle of state employee per-
formance evaluation, CSEA is undertaking a com-
prehensive and ambitious training program for
union leaders and membership.
“Management’s job is to train its supervisors,
who were certainly ill-prepared for the first round
of evaluations. Our job is to monitor the system and
to be in a position to protect our members if
problems develop,’ said Marty Langer, CSEA’s
representative on the joint labor/management
Committee on the Work Environment and Produc-
tivity (CWEP).
“Obviously, we can’t do a proper job of monitor-
ing the system if we don’t have the proper training
and knowledge at our disposal.”
An ambitious schedule of training is targeted for
October and early November and is designed to
reach about 1,000 CSEA leaders and members who
will have roles to play in the fall round of
evaluations.
CSEA has contracted with the consulting firm of
Lieb, Lefkowitz and Associates of Washington,
D.C., to spearhead the training effort.
In addition, the union has appointed Alayne Katz
to the position of Coordinator of Monitoring Ac-
tivities. She will be responsible for the ad-
ministration of CSEA’s monitoring and training ef-
forts in performance evaluation.
Six Regional Training Specialists have also been
appointed to assist in the training and monitoring
effort. They are: Greg Szurnicki, Region 1; Marie
Romanelli, Region 3; Joe Conway, Region 4; Bill
Kirvyanik, Region 5; and Mickey Stanton, Region 6.
The Region 2 specialist will be appointed shortly.
“We're basically talking about a two-stage train-
ing effort in the coming weeks,” Langer explained.
Stage one will consist of one- oy. “Orientation to
- ALBANY ‘The first 100 State-employed clerical workers have been
_ promoted into professional jobs under a Civil Service Employees
_ Association- ee ES ae program, . four months ahead of
- four months ahead of schedule
gram were expected to begin
said CSEA President William: L.
Performance Evaluation’’ sessions held at some 22
locations around the state. These sessions for CSEA
leadership and staff will be conducted during Oc-
tober. ©
Stage two, designed to train individuals for their
future monitoring activities, will be conducted
between Oct. 23 and Nov. 12. Participating will be
State Division Local Presidents and Local
designees to both Performance Evaluation Appeal
Boards and Labor/Management Committees.
Members designated to attend these sessions will
be granted time off from work.
Once formal training has concluded, Alayne Katz
and the six Regional Specialists will conduct train-
ing programs for local union membership and will
act as liaison between local union officials and
management representatives in an effort to resolve
issues on a regional basis. An additional element of
the program is that members trained by CSEA will
monitor the State’s program for training its super-
visors on performance evaluation.,
“The concept of the performance evaluation
system is a good‘one,”’ Langer commented. ‘‘It’s a
program through which our members can profit,
advancing through the system more rapidly and
receiving awards for outstanding performance.
“But the initial implementation of the program
was a debacle. The fact that 50 percent of the un-
satisfactory rating appeal’s reaching the Statewide
Appeals Board were overturned is proof that the
_supervisors were ill-equipped to conduct
evaluations.
“CSEA can’t afford to be caught napping.
Through this training and through our
knowledgeable grassroots monitoring of the
program, we can ensure that our membership
benefits,’ Langer concluded.
‘CSEA’ Program has first promotions
“The traineeships are filled by statewide competitive exams,’ " said
CSEA Collective Bargaining Specialist John Conoby, who negotiated the
Program.
miLolic
=36ECTOR
Ambitious training plan.
“They are open to clerical and Secretarial employees ‘who ha’ been i in q
‘grades 11, 1
CSEA anticipates making its first-ever
endorsement of a presidential can-
didate for the November election and
the union’s statewide Political Action
Committee has recommended that the
union endorse President Jimmy Carter
for re-election. That recommendation
will be considered by CSEA’s elected
delegates on October 1 in Niagara
Falls. The reasoning behind that
recommendation is included as a
special ‘‘pull out’’ section as pages 5, 6,
7 and 8 of this issue of The Public Sec-
tor. It is suggested that you pull out
that section and save it for future
references.
13 v ars; or
CSEA, state request federai funds in a
joint pact to train mental therapy aides
tt
FINALIZING AN AGREEMENT to apply for Federal McGowan, OMRDD Commissioner James Introne, and
funds to train MHTAs are CSEA President William L. OER Director Meyer Frucher.
CSEA activist named
to labor
council
Flora Beaton first woman
to gain executive council
CANTON — Flora Jane Beaton,
Vice President of St. Lawrence
County CSEA Local 845, has been ap-
pointed to the executive council of the
Jefferson-Lewis-St. Lawrence Coun-
ties Trades and Labor Council of the
AFL-CIO, Council President Joseph
St. Dennis announced recently.
Mrs. Beaton, a county public health
nurse from Ogdensburg and a
member of the CSEA contract
negotiating team for 1980, is the first
CSEA representative and the first
woman ever to serve on the executive
council, Mr. St. Dennis said.
The executive council consists of
Parole celebrates
golden anniversary
On July 1, 1980, the Division of
Parole celebrated its 50th Anniver-
sary as a New York State Agency. To
commemorate its golden year, the
Division will hdld a 50th Anniversary
Dinner-Dance at the New York State
Convention Center, Empire State
Plaza, Albany, N.Y. on October 9,
1980. There will be a cash bar cocktail
hour from 6:00-7:00, The cost of the
dinner is $12.00. Dinner will be served
at 7:30. Everyone is invited to join in
the celebration. Interested persons,
please call (518) 457-8178 prior to
September 26,
the president and nine directors
elected for two-year terms by
delegates from the member unions of
the council. Vacancies are filled by
appointment, however, and the ex-
ecutive council recently appointed
Mrs. Beaton to fill such a vacancy.
Her term will expire in June 1981.
In an interview with a reporter
from the Watertown Daily Times, Mr.
St. Dennis pointed out that Mrs. Bea-
ton “was chosen first of all for her
willingness and desire to help people.
And also, a lot of women are union
members.”’ In addition, St. Dennis
noted, ‘‘We are looking for a balanced
board.”
St. Dennis further explained the ex-
ecutive council now has three
representatives each from the in-
dustrial trades, construction workers,
and public sector employees. Richard
Reno, President of CSEA Local 845,
added further tribute by saying, ‘‘We
are extremely pleased to hear of her
appointment to the executive council.
It not only represents a significant
event for Flora Jane Beaton, it’s a’
proud day for unionism and all the
dedicated women in CSEA who have
given so much for their fellow public
employees. For the 35,000 members in.
CSEA Region V, and more than 200,-
000 others statewide, we wish her
every success,
Page 2
"THE PUBLIC SECTOR, Wednesday, September 24, 1980
ALBANY — Training which would
give Mental Hygiene Therapy Aides
(MHTAs) a boost toward upward job
mobility is the ultimate goal of a
grant application being submitted
jointly by CSEA and the state.
CSEA, the Office of Mental Retar-
dation and Developmental
Disabilities and the Office of
Employee Relations have agreed to
seek nearly $500,000 in Federal funds
under Title 20 of the Social Security
Act. It is thought to be the first time
that a labor union and government
agency have joined in requesting such
occupational training funds.
CSEA Program Specialist Paula
Lambert explained that the
labor/management team working on
the program hopes to reach 300
MHTAs throughout the state in the
first year of training.
“Title 20 funds allow you to train
employees to move from institutional
settings to community-based
facilities,’ Ms. Lambert explained.
“We also hope to develop some up-
ward mobility within the system,
allowing movement, for example,
from grade 7 to 11 or from 9 to 13.
“Direct patient care personnel
have been dead-ended in their jobs
with neither the skills nor the career
ladder opportunities through which to
advance. This request for training
funds is undeniable evidence of the
joint commitment.to.remedying this
situation.”
AFL-CIO gives Senator
Moynihan a 100% rating
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D., N.Y.) received a 100 percent
legislative rating from the national AFL-CIO for his votes on 19 issues con!
sidered hy the Senate from October, 1979, to August, 1980.
Moynihan was one of only three Senators with perfect labor records thi:
year. He was also the only member of the New York Congressional
delegation to receive a 100 percent score.
The ratings, which are compiled and published each year by the AF’
CIO’s Committee on Political Education, are based on a wide variety o|
votes on labor, economic, and social policy issues.
Three votes identified by the AFL-CIO as being ‘‘of prime importance to
the labor movement”’ were initiated by Senator Moynihan. iq
These were a motion by Moynihan to table a proposal cutting trade ad
justment assistance by $1.1 billion; a motion to table an amendment tha
would have weakened the Davis-Bacon Act, which requires payment o
prevailing wages on federal construction projects; and an amendment to th
| Defense Department appropriations bill that would have targeted federa
spending to areas with high unemployment. Moynihan’s position prevailed
on the first two issues.
Since coming to the senate in January, 1977, Moynihan has compiled a
overall AFL-CIO rating of 93 percent. Only 14 of 100 Senators have rating!
above 90 percent.
Workers win cash for ideas
POUGHKEEPSIE — Two Dutchess County employees have received
cash prizes for suggestions made to promote economy in government, the first
ever made under a new ‘‘Merit Award Program”’ set up as a result of CSEA’s
initiative, reported County Unit President Scott Daniels.
“They were based,” says Merit Board Chairperson Barbara Babcock, who
also serves as a Local 814 Vice President, ‘‘on the initiative exhibited by
employees beyond their job duties. Both suggestions will lead to saving
employee’s time which, in turn, saves the county money.”
Recipients were Theresa M. O’Donnell and Dorothy Szabo.
Ms. O'Donnell was cited for her suggestion that a “‘policy and procedures
manual’’ be drawn up for new county employees. She is an employee of
Dutchess Community College.
Ms. Szabo was singled out for her suggestion that signs be installed at her
department, county mental hygiene, to improve the flow of both visitors and
clients,
Action of Freeport sanitation workers
‘great display of union solidarity’
FREEPORT — CSEA employees of the Village of Freeport, which dis-
banded its 47-employee sanitation crew a year ago, refused to pick up garbage
during the recent strike against private carting firms, despite a direct order
that they do so by Freeport’s Mayor.
William White, Mayor of Freeport, on Sept. 3 had Edward Prefer,
superintendent of public works, order village employees to work on sanitation
trucks borrowed from nearby communities of Westbury, Far Rockaway and
Hempstead, which still have municipal sanitation departments. The strike by
Teamster Local 813 against 72 private garbage carters in Nassau and Suffolk
Counties affected about 12,000 homes and businesses in Freeport.
Nicholas Abbatiello, president of CSEA Nassau Local 830, Jerry Donahue,
Local 830 first vice president, Ralph Spagnola, president of Nassau CSEA
D-P.W. unit, Tom Gargiulo, a Nassau County CSEA delegate, and a host of
Local 830 and CSEA staff attended a 7:30 a.m. meeting at the Freeport Village
garage where 22 employees were asked to deploy the trucks at time-and-a-half-
pay. Each employee said ‘“‘no” as their names were read from a list by Mr.
Prefer.
“It was a great display of union solidarity,” said Mr. Abbatiello. ‘There
was a lot of pressure being put on the employees. The mayor had each person
tallied individually and threatened with being fired if the employees didn’t pick
up the garbage. We were there with them to give them support and advice.
“When the Mayor was getting ready to subcontract garbage collection last
year, we rallied community support to keep the department. One of our main
arguments was that public employees couldn’t strike because of the Taylor
|
Local 690 hosts its
Law, but private employees could and would,’’ Mr. Abbatiello said. ‘‘When the
mayor saw that we would win at a public meeting, he cancelled it and un-
ilaterally went ahead and signed the contract with the carters.”
Robert J. Ford, CSEA Freeport unit president, said the village also threatened
to bring the employees of the Highway, Parks, and Sewage treatment departments
up on charges of insubordination if they refused the orderto pick up garbage.
“We weren't refusing to do our jobs. The highway employees were willing
to repair streets and the parks people were willing to work in the parks, but we
are not permitted by civil service law to work out of title,” Mr. Ford said.
The four day strike ended before the town brought any charges although
the CSEA was ready to defend the employees against any legal action, said Mr.
Abbatiello,
CSEA Safety Hotline
800-342-4824
22nd annual clam steam
CSEA Tax and Finance Local 690 hosted its
22nd annual clam steam recently in conjunction
with Insurance Department CSEA Local 666,
and a number of union officials attended as
guests along with Albany-area political figures.
In the above photo, from left are Tax and
Finance CSEA Board of Directors rep John
Gully, CSEA Capital Region IV President
Joseph McDermott, State Senator Joseph L.
Bruno, who has been endorsed by CSEA for re-
election in November; CSEA Statewide
Secretary Irene Carr, CSEA Executive Vice
President Thom; McDonough, Local 666
President and CS Board of Directors rep
Betty Collins, and Local 690 Vice President Bill
Burdick.
In the photo below, from left are Local 690
President Carmen Bagnoli, Local 690 Secretary
Helen Butrym, Board of Directors rep John
Gully, Local 690 Vice President Bill Burdick
(rear), Local 690 past president Santa Orsino,
Local Vice President Mary Jaro, Tom
O'Donnell, and Local Vice President Lee John-
CY
SECTOR
Albany, New York 12224,
12204. Single copy Price 25¢
Official publication of
The Civil Service Employees Association
33 Elk Street, Albany, New York 12224
The Public Sector (445010) is published every Wednesday
weekly except for Wednesdays after New Years, Memorial
Day, Fourth of July and Labor Day for $5 by the Civil Service
Employees Association, 33 Elk Street, Albany, New York
12224,
Second Class Postage paid at Post Office, Albany, New York.
Send address changes to The Public Sector, 33 Elk Street,
Publication office, 75 Champlain Street, Albany, New York
Thomas A. Clemente—Publisher
Roger A. Cole—Executive Editor
Dr. Gerald Alperstein—Associate Editor
Gwenn M. Bellcourt — Associate Editor
Deborah Cassidy—Staff Writer
Dawn LePore—Staff Writer
John L. Murphy—Staff Writer
Arden D. Lawand—Graphic Design
Dennis C. Mullahy—Production Coordinator
Published every Wednesday by Clarity Publishing, Inc. Publication
Office, 75 Champlain Street, Albany, N.Y. 12204 (518) 465-4501
SEPTEMBER THAW...
PLAYOFFS WERE RECENTLY HELD for the Wassaic
Developmental Center’s Softball League’s “Traveling
Trophy.” The Sports Circle Tavern Team successfully
defended its championship, and holding on to the prize
for another year were Team Captain Tom Sprossel,
Local President Harold Ryan, Team Manager Pete
Harold, and team co-sponsor Bob Sullivan. Local 426
donated the trophy, explains Ryan, ‘‘to show our support
for the center’s employees.” He adds, ‘‘if you’ve ever
had a job in the human services field, you know how
demanding — and taxing — the work can be. It’s for this
reason that we encourage our employees to take up out-
side interests.” Norman Moore is the team’s other spon-
sor.
MUBMUMMMM MM MD
Tripi elected Pres.
of CSEA Local 828
ROCHESTER — Florence Tripi
has been elected President of the
2300-member Monroe County
Employees Unit of Local 828 of the
Civil Service Employees Association
(CSEA) for a two year term.
Tripi, a public employee for 12
years, is a Nursing Clerical Super-
visor for the Monroe County Health
Department. She will continue as co-
chairperson of the CSEA Western
Region 6 Political Action Committee
and as a member of the Statewide
Political Action Committee.
Other unit officers elected include
Jean McAvoy, first vice president:
Clifford Roberts, second vice
president; Joanna Williams, third
vice president; Dorothy Toussiant,
secretary and Patricia Gooden,
treasurer.
RMI A LL Et
AFSCME President Wurf eulogizes Irving Flaumenbaum
By Jerry Wurf
All of AFSCME suffered a grievous
loss with the passing of Irving
Flaumenbaum,
Irv was a giant in public employee
unionism in New York State for
almost 30 years. During the years that
we were building AFSCME as the
union for New York City government
employees, we respected Irv’s ac-
complishments in building CSEA as
the union for public employees on
Long Island.
With the affiliation of CSEA and
AFSCME in 1978 — and with Irv’s
election to the International Ex-
ecutive Board — he made a con-
siderable contribution to AFSCME on
the national level
Irv understood that our union has
many missions — at the bargaining
table, in the legislative and political
arena, and as a force of justice in our
communities.
Irv knew that New York State and
Nassau and Suffolk Counties — like
state and local governments
throughout the nation — are heavily
dependent upon federal aid. He was a
strong supporter of AFSCME’s
legislative and political programs to
continue and expand general revenue
sharing and other programs of federal
aid to state and local governments.
Coming from a community where
middle and low income people are
justifiably angered by unfair tax
systems, Irv had the courage to op-
pose reckless tax cuts, such as
California’s Proposition 13, and to
support progressive tax reform of
local property taxes to ease the
burden upon working people.
A dedicated fighter for the state and
local government employees he
represented, Irv advocated continued
support for state hospitals to insure
high-quality care for the mentally ill
and retarded and job protections for
the employees who care for them. I
Page 4
THE PUBLIC SECTOR, Wednesday, September 24, 1980
recall that Irv raised his concern at
a meeting earlier this year with
President Carter in the White House.
As an older American, Irv took a
strong interest in the needs of
retirees. He served on the retirees
subcommittee of the International
Executive Board, and was especially
concerned that older Americans be
protected from runaway inflation.
Irv understood that the livelihoods
of public employees depend upon the
actions of the men and women elected
to public office, at the local, state,
and national levels.
He stood firmly for the bi-partisan
approach, Irv believed that the in-
terests of Long Island, New York
State, and the nation were best served
by union support of both Republicans
and Democrats. Irv never allowed
either party to write off
CSEA/AFSCME members — or take
us for granted.
Irv knew education builds a
stronger union. He welcomed joint
CSEA/AFSCME education programs,
including the recently completed
Training the Trainers program, which
lays the foundation for Region I
members to begin their own
leadership and steward training
programs.
Irv believed that our union must be
a force for justice and decency. He
was a strong supporter of the boycott
of J. P. Stevens, the textile company
which has refused to bargain with the
Amalgamated Clothing and Textile
Workers Union. He was a leading ad-
vocate of declaring Martin Luther
King’s birthday a national holiday.
Irv appeared regularly on the
Arthritis Foundation’s yearly
telethon — and he never came empty-
handed.
Irving Flaumenbaum gave unstini
ingly of himself. The living memorial
to him is the union which he worked
so hard to build.
For the first time in its long and illustrious history, the Civil
Service Employees Assn. is anticipating offering its en-
dorsement to a U.S. Presidential candidate. That historical
event is expected to occur on Wednesday, October 1 at the
Niagara Falls Convention Center when some 1,400 elected union
delegates will consider a recommendation from the union’s
Statewide Political Action Committee to endorse the re-election
of President Jimmy Carter.
The recommendation from CSEA’s PAC was reported on the
front page of last week’s Public Sector, and the previous week’s
issue reported on the endorsement of President Carter by the
MPresidential
endorsement:
istorical first
by key labor union
n a crucial state
International Executive Board of the American Federation of
State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). That ac-
tion, in turn, followed the enthusiastic endorsement of President
Carter by the AFL-CIO General Board.
On this and some following pages is a wide range of some of
the information considered by CSEA’s Political Action Com-
mittee in arriving at its recommendation that CSEA endorse
President Carter for re-election. It is being printed here for the
general information of the membership, and prior to the time
that elected delegates will be considering the committee’s
recommendation in Niagara Falls.
PAG: a cross-section of the rank-and-file
ALBANY .— In a precedent-setting action,
| CSEA Delegates representing every segment of
the state’s largest public employee union are be-
ing asked to endorse Jimmy Carter for
reelection as President of the United States by
the union’s Statewide Political Action Com-
mittee.
For CSEA, a Presidential endorsement would
be the first that the union has made in its 70-year
history. For Jimmy Carter, the endorsement
could prove to be a crucial source of support ina
state that most political experts predict the
President must carry to be returned to the White
House and the one state with which he may have
the most trouble.
Political action has been a rising star in
CSEA’s representation of its membership in
CSEA’S POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
that
President Jimmy Carter for re-election.
recent years, but few could have predicted a few
years ago that CSEA could suddenly find itself in
a critical position in one of the most momentous
political decisions in the country.
At the heart of the situation is the 17-member
Political Action Committee representing all
segments of the union’s membership. On
September 12, after lengthy discussion and
review of research compiled by political experts,
the Committee voted 12-0 (some members were
absent) to recommend to the CSEA’s Delegates
that the union endorse President Carter and Vice
President Walter Mondale for re-election.
“We weighed our options carefully and made
our decision based upon some very clear cut
evidence that is contained in the public record of
the Presidential candidates,’ commented Com-
shown last week deliberating its recommendation
EA endorse a presidential candidate. The committee has recommended that the union back
THE PUBLIC SECTOR, Wednesday, September 24, 1980
mittee Chairman Joseph Conway.
“This Committee has a tradition of long hours,
hard decisions and the determination to
represent the best interests of our membership
in the area of political action on a statewide, or
in this case a national level,’’ Mr. Conway said.
“We took the action that we did with such un-
animity because we are all convinced that the
recommendation to endorse President Carter for
reelection is to the benefit of our members and
our union
“In campaigns at this level it is very easy to
get lost in the positions of candidates on very
broad issues dealing with national defense, the
condition of world affairs, the national economy
and other similar issues, but too often we fail to
see through the news media where the can-
didates stand on the ‘smaller’ issues that really
affect us,” the chairman said.
“This committee has concerned itself not only
with those broad issues which are of course im-
portant to all Americans, but we have also look-
ed into the issues that deal specifically with
labor and with the views of the candidates on
public employees and public employee unions.
“There is no doubt in my mind and, I think, in
the minds of the other Committee members, that
when these issues are clearly presented to our
Delegates and to our membership, this union will
conclude with the AFL-CIO, AFSCME, and most
other labor organizations that Jimmy Carter
would be the best President to lead our country
into the 80's,’ Mr. Conway said.
Serving on the Political Action Committee in
addition to Mr. Conway, are: Nicholas Ab-
batiello, Robert Kolterman, Michael Curtin —
Region One; Leroy Edwards — Region Two;
Alex Hogg, Carmine DiBattista, Eleanor Mc-
Donald — Region Three; Mr. Conway, Timothy
Drew, John Vallee — Region Four; Moira
Griener, Fran Mitchell, Barbara Pickell -
Region Five; Dominic Savarino, Florence Tripi,
June Ferner — Region Six.
sy
“Page 5
ALBANY — Labor unions considering endorsements of candidates for
public office always compare the records of the candidates on labor issues, but
in the Presidential race of Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and John Anderson,
there is little room for comparison. Jimmy Carter is the winner.
CSEA’s Statewide Political Action Committee considered the records of
the candidates before voting unanimously to recommend that the union’s
Delegates endorse Jimmy Carter for reelection next week. Armed with exten-
sive research from the AFL-CIO’s Committee on Political Education (COPE),
ASFCME's political experts in Washington, D.C. and news media accounts, the
AFL-CIO on his record on labor issues, He votes with the AFL-CIO only 28
percent of the time and votes against it 72 percent of the time. He voted
“wrong”’ on labor law reform to protect the right of workers to join unions,
against the common situs picketing bill, for reduced funding for OSHA, against
CETA, and against food stamps for strikers. In 1979, when eight critical labor
bills were considered, Mr. Anderson was absent for seven votes and ‘‘wrong’’
on the eighth
The comparison of President Carter and Mr. Reagan are a little less
statistical since neither can be “‘scored’’ on voting, but the record is clear all
the same, according to organized labor.
In the area of public employment, President Carter-supports collective
bargaining rights for public employees. Governor Reagan opposes those rights.
Mr. Carter has supported, for example, a bill before Congress requiring states
to negotiate with public employee unions to protect workers displaced by dein-
stitutionalization of mental patients, Mr. Reagan, as governor of California,
vetoed legislation in 1973 to give collective bargaining rights to teachers.
Teachers only won the right to bargain under the administration of Gov. Jerry
Brown. Even today, local government employees in California have no collec-
tive bargaining rights.
In 1972, then Gov. Reagan also vetoed a bill providing a grievance
procedure for employees of the University of California.
President Carter is an ouispoken proponent of labor’s view in another key
area, occupational safety. During the Carter Administration, there has been a
17 percent increase in OSHA’s enforcement personnel and new, tough stan-
dards to protect workers from toxic substances and cancer-causing substances
in work locations.
Mr. Reagan opposes mandatory OSHA (see related story) and, in fact, has
publicly advocated that its enforcement powers be greatly weakened and its
regulations made voluntary. The Washington Post, on June 5, quoted candidate
CARTER VS. REAGAN VS. ANDERS@
On key labor issues of vital interest,
President Carter gets very high marks ;
ALBANY — “What about John Anderson?”
Regan as saying, “My idea of an OSHA would be if government set up
agency that would do research and study how things could be improved and
dustry could go to it and say, we have a problem here and we seem to lose mo
people by accidents in this particular function. Would you look at our plant a
then come back and give us a survey.”
President Carter has opposed Congressional attempts — supported
Reagan — to weaken OSHA enforcement. e
Mr. Reagan has recently indicated that if elected President, he wht cd
sider changing the nation’s anti-trust laws to apply to unions, as well as to gia
corporations. Mr. Carter would strongly resist such efforts, stating that t!
anti-trust laws were never intended to apply to labor unions.
If anti-trust laws did apply to unions, the results would be disastrous. In t}
private sector, industry wide bargaining would be illegal. This would aff
every building trade and industrial union in the country. National unions covd
ing an entire industry couldn’t exist.. In the AFL-CIO, prohibition agai
intra-union ‘“‘raiding’’ might be declared illegal.
President Carter supports minimum wage increases. Mr. Reagan oppog
minimum wage law provisions as governor of California he opposed mi@my @
wage laws, but now Says he can live with them if there is a ‘‘subminimum”
youth.
On the subject of compulsory open shop laws, President Carter oppog
these “‘right-to-work’’ measures. Mr. Reagan favors them. “I would fi
myself tending to support the right to work law,”’ he said during a debate}
South Carolina in 1960. His position hasn’t changed. The self-proclai
“‘right-to-work”’ groups are vocal opponents of agency shop provisions of pub]
sector contracts which are vital to the financial integrity of public emplo
unions.
Mr. Reagan opposed labor law reform bills introduced before the Congr
in recent years to allow workers to join unions free from employer pr&suj
Not only is President Carter a supporter of such legislation, he proposed
President Carter has supported a compromise version of the Humphr
Hawkins plan to guarantee full employment through federal jobs, but
Reagan opposes any federal full employment law. In fact, according to a ma.
news magazine, ‘‘Mr. Reagan would largely do away with 600,000 public s|
vice jobs created under the Comprehensive Employment and Training A\
that now cost about $6 billion a year... .”
On issue after issue identified by the AFL-CIO, AFSCME, the United At
Workers, and other major organized labor representatives as vital to the
terests of America’s workers, President Carter gets higher marks fog lal
support than Gov. Reagan.
How poor is that record? According to the Co
REAGAN
A ¥ COMPARISON yx ON yx THE ¥x ISSUES
ISSUE
REAGAN
Recently announced revitalization effort to
cushion the current recession and stimulate
long-term growth, consists of targeted tax and
spending programs to create jobs and support
services in distressed areas.
ECONOMY
aes eT
Untargeted, arbitrary tax reductions; the bulk
of which would go to higher income families.
Targeted incentives to encourage productivity
and investment; rejection of arbitrary spend-
restraint and high interest rates.
INFLATION
Calls for a policy of high interest rates, sharp
spending restraint and tax reduction.
Rejects arbitrary balanced budget goal; spend-
ing policies sensitive to economic conditions
and the needs of the less advantaged.
FEDERAL BUDGET
Supports constitutional amendment to balance
the budget and a limitation on growth in gov-
emment spending.
Encourages investments in distressed areas;
supports targeted job-creation programs and
countercyclical fiscal assistance to stabilize and
support public services.
. URBAN POLICY
Emphasis on tax reduction rather than spend-
ing to stimulate overall economic growth.
Favors enactment of this fiscal assistance pro-
gram to state local governments.
COUNTER-
CYCLICAL AID
No mention.
Commitment to targeted non-inflationary tax
cuts; supports income tax credit for Social Se-
curity taxes paid which would be available to
working people and employers (including state
The dismal record
of John Anderson:
Anderson went
against labor
position on
72 per cent
of his votes
in Congress
Committee found clear indications of consistently pro-labor action by the
President and consistently anti-labor action by his opponents.
Mr. Anderson, as a sitting member of Congress, has been ‘‘scored’’ by the
B
That’s a question that many people are asking in
America as the third ‘“‘major’’ presidential can-
didate continues to seek a place on ballots across
the country. It is a question which the CSEA
Statewide Political Action Committee dealt with in
considering its recommendation that the union en-
dorse President Jimmy Carter for reelection.
John B. Anderson is a candidate for the
Presidency. He even has a running mate, Patrick
Lucey, a former two-term governor from Wiscon-
sin, The only thing that Anderson really lacks in his
campaign is organization, money and support.
From a peak support of 25 percent‘of voters poll-
ed in one national survey in June, Mr. Anderson
seems to have firmly bottomed-out at about 14
percent support in the most recent political polls.
Business Week magazine reports in a recent edition
that so badly has Mr. Anderson’s campaign
floundered, that the Carter campaign is no longer
regarding Anderson's effort as harmful to the
President's chances for reelection,
Whatever the national implications of an
Anderson candidacy may be, Mr. Anderson is on the
ballot in New York State on November 4 as the
Liberal Party candidate, a decision that has in-
furiated many labor leaders who protest that Mr.
Anderson’s poor record of support on labor
legislation should exclude him from the Liberal
Party ticket.
Page 6
THE PUBLIC SECTOR, Wednesday, September 24, 1980
mittee on Political Education of the AFL-CIO,
Anderson's career in Congress has not been a bo
to labor. Out of a possible “batting average’ of
percent on labor issues, Mr. Anderson polled onl:
dismal 28 percent. He voted against AFL-CIO si
ported legislation in Congress 72 percent of t|
time.
At one point, Mr. Anderson even supported {]
infamous Reagan-Kemp-Roth proposal to gut t]
federal treasury by reducing income taxes by
percent over a three year period. This propog
would be a windfall for the wealthy. An averal
worker with a $12,000 a year income would get a
break of about $1.77 per week under the Reaga
Kemp-Roth plan, but someone with a $100,000}
year income would pocket a tax savings of $2,
per year. e
Recently Mr. Anderson has disavowed himsq
of Reagan-Kemp-Roth.
Adding to Rep. Anderson's disfavor is his s
port of massive tax cuts for industry instead
workers, a call for a 50 cent per gallon gasoline td
and the fear of some labor leaders that
moderates cast a vote for Mr. Anderson, they a
really casting a vote for Ronald Reagan since
Anderson cannot win the election but can deny
Carter votes.
and local governments).
TAX REFORM
Endorses the Kemp-Roth tax cut which is a
10% (per year for 3 years) across-the-board
income tax cut; most of the tax relief would
go to upper income people and would gener-
ally be inflationary.
Immediate establishment of a federal assist-
@ ance program to aid public hospitals in fiscally
distressed jurisdictions.
PUBLIC GENERAL
HOSPITALS
SS SEE Ss
No specific mention, but the Platform encour-
ages private sector delivery of health care serv-
ices and opposes government-regulated health
services.
Supports universal and comprehensive health
insurance.
NATIONAL HEALTH
INSURANCE
|
a
a
i
i
i
§
Opposes a national health insurance system.
Supports private health care—would provide
tax credits to benefit the rich.
e@ Fae . 5 .
Supports guaranteed minimum benefit levels, Rejects notion of guaranteed income; opposes |
fiscal relief for states, elimination of local share WELFARE REFORM federal the system; supports a return of 5
of costs. responsibility to the states. f
Supports increased community-based services DEINSTITUTION- Supports “tax relief” for families of mentally (
for the mentally ill and retarded together with ZA disabled people. No mention of any protec- i
training and jobs for institutional employees. ALi TION tions for employees.
e
Chart courtesy of AFSCME
THE PUBLIC SECTOR, Wednesday, September 24, 1980
Page 7
(RE RR
VS.
ALBANY — Recommending an endorsement
f a Presidential candidate put the CSEA’s
tatewide Political Action Committee into a
‘omparison of the positions of major candidates
mn a number of issues affecting union members,
ut of all the areas where there were glaring
ifferences to be found, no where were those
ifferences as pronounced as in the area of men-
al health care
“Our conclusion in recommending CSEA’s en-
lorsement of President Carter was based upon
any things,”’ says Political Action Committee
Chairman Joseph Conway, ‘but a comparison of
he record of Ronald Reagan and the actions of
resident Carter in the area of mental health
sare was certainly an important factor. Our un-
ion represents more than 47,000 mental health
‘are workers and, believe me, they have no
riend in Gov. Reagan.
The Committee voted unanimously on
eptember 12 to recommend to union Delegates
eeting in Niagara Falls next week that CSEA
ndorse President Carter and Vice President
alter Mondale for reelection. The ultimate
lecision on the endorsement is expected to be
ade by the Delegates on October 1.
CSEA’s members in the state's Office of Men-
al Health and Office of Mental Retardation have
een faced with crisis after crisis over the past
several years as the concept of deinstitutionaliz-
ing patients from state institutions into com-
munity treatment settings gained acceptance.
he biggest problem was that while the state
as quick to discharge the patients from in-
stitutions, it has been lax in providing com-
unity treatment. The practice is called ‘‘\dum-
ing’ and its affects on the patients and
pmployees have been tragic.
But if New York has mental health care
roblems, California has a disaster and that dis-
ster was born under the reign of Gov. Ronald
eagan. During the first six years of his ad-
inistration, hospitals were closed and patients
lumped in wholesale numbers. In 1967, when
Reagan took office, there were 22,000 patients in
Jalifornia institutions. By 1973, there were only
,000 left, a 68 percent h.
By comparison, President Carter has ad-
yocated the concept of deinstitutionalization, but
CARTER CSEA’s PAC finds differences:
most glaring, perhaps, their
REAGAN Mental health care positions
has insisted on safeguards to protect the in-
terests of discharged patients and also to protect
the interests of displaced employees.
The President has supported a bill nearing
approval in Congress — and co-sponsored by Sen.
Edward M. Kennedy — that requires states
receiving federal funds to negotiate with unions
representing employees affected by dis-
placements stemming from dein-
Stitutionalization.
Despite Gov. Reagan’s opposition to this
legislation, AFSCME political experts predict its
passage within the next few weeks in what is ex-
pected to be a major benefit to mental health
care employees across the country.
Having a President willing to insist that
federal funds be used to protect the interests of
patients and employees rather than attack those
interests, can be a great factor in making states
pay attention to the needs of their mental health
care workers. The Committee concluded that
while President Carter’s action has proved his
willingness to help mental health employees,
Mr. Reagan’s record has not.
To quote one AFSCME publication on mental
health care, ‘‘During Ronald Regan’s ad-
ministration, beginning in 1966, three of 14 men-
tal hospitals had already closed and a fourth had
ceased accepting new patients. In January 1973
— before an angry state legislature passed a halt
to hospital closings over Reagan’s vote — the
governor dropped a political bombshell. He
planned to close all state hospitals for the men-
tally ill by 1977, except for criminal offenders
alone. Hospitals for the retarded would be
eliminated by 1981.”
The California legislature was so outraged by
the action that it passed a bill forbidding the
governor from closing any hospitals without its
consent. When Gov. Reagan vetoed the bill, the
legislature voted to ovetride, the first override
of any action by Reagan.
PRESIDENT CARTER RESPONDS to the enthusiastic endorsement
of the AFL-CIO General Board. With the President on the dais are
Labor Sec. Ray Marshall, AFL-CIO President Lane Kirkland and AFL-
CIO Sec.-Treas. Thomas R. Donahue. ‘Together, we will win,” Carter
told the union representatives.
ALBANY — CSEA was one of the first labor
unions to support the Equal Rights Amendment
to the U.S. Constitution. CSEA Delegates endors-
ed it unanimously nearly seven years ago. This
support was a factor in the Statewide Political
Action Committees review of the records of
Presidential candidates and again, according to
the Committee, President Carter was a winner.
The President and the Democratic Party Plat-
form are both strong advocates of the ERA. The
Platform states quite clearly, ‘Both the ERA
and the District of Columbia Voting Rights
Amendment to the Constitution must be ratified
and our full commitment must be given to those
efforts
President Carter has been a campaigner for
ERA approval when state legislatures have con-
sidered action on the amendment. His actions as
President, however, speaks even louder than his
words. He has appointed more women to top
level federal positions than all other Presidents
combined. He has also appointed more women
and minority group members to federal
THE PUBLIC SECTOR, Wednesday, September 24, 1980
President Carter in forefront
when it comes to ERA advocacy
judgeships than all other Presidents combined.
Ronald Reagan is another story. Candidate
Reagan says he is for equal rights for women,
but he also says that he is opposed to the
enactment of the Equal Rights Amendment.
Like many other areas of policy, Mr. Reagan
believes the federal government should get in the
back seat and let individual states do the driving.
Says Reagan, ‘‘I will establish a liaison with the
50 governors to encourage them to eliminate
wherever it exists, discrimination against
women,""
His position is apparently shared by the
Republican party which, for the first time in
more than 40 years, has withdrawn its support of
enactment of an ERA. The GOP Platform
states, ‘‘We acknowledge the legitimate efforts
of those who support or oppose ratification of the
Equal Rights Amendment.”
Rep. John Anderson, an independent candidate
for the Presidency, is an advocate of ERA. Asa
Congressman, Rep. Anderson has voted con-
sistently in support of the Amendment.
DANNY DONOHUE
A glimpse at his new role
as president of Region |
By Gerald Alperstein
Associate Editor
NORTH AMITYVILLE — Danny Donohue
admits he became active in CSEA because of
the late Irving Flaumenbaum, the man he
replaced as president of the Long Island
Region
“Irving was one of the persons who got me
active in our union — CSEA — and in
directing me towards the regional office,”
says Donohue, who now finds himself at the
forefront of CSEA’s largest region; one which
claims nearly 60,000 members
Of that responsibility, he says, “‘Our region
is growing and changing. Our region's
leadership is actively responding to that
change.”
Yet Donohue pauses to reflect on the
teachings of his predecessor. ‘‘Irving always
spoke of one union and not of county, school
district, subdivisions or state. . . . I, like Ir-
ving, also see CSEA as one union.”
“What Irving and others have built on Long
Island has to be continued by our locals and
members working together,’’ says Donohue,
who received a unanimous vote of confidence
by the Region I Executive Board earlier this
month.
As for his presidency, Donohue stresses
that he will ‘‘make available the strength of
the region to all local presidents and the
membership.”’
Donohue sees CSEA Region I growing
stronger by working together as taxpayers
and voters in Nassau and Suffolk counties.
“The economy is hurting all persons, es-
pecially public employees, We, the members.
of our union, by pulling together, will protect
our livelihood,” he said.
He recently spoke before the Assembly
Educational Task Force Committee on
property tax changes. He told the panel of
legislators that fair and decent wages and
safe working conditions must be maintained
regardless of what changes may occur in
property tax laws.
Donohue was elected Region I First Vice
President in 1979 and held that position at the
time of Mr. Flaumenbaum’s death on Aug. 27,
1980.
His rise to regional president (and CSEA
vice president) started in 1975 when he was
elected president of Central Islip Psychiatric
Center Local 404 by a write-in vote. He was
re-elected in 1977 and 1979
In 1976, Donohue became a member of the
Region I Legislature and Political Action
Committee, a membership which has con-
tinued to date.
He was chairman of the statewide
Nominating Committee in 1977.
The CSEA Mental Hygiene Presidents’
Committee elected Donohue its chairman in
1978. He was re-elected in 1980.
Also in 1978, he became a member of the
Region I Mental Hygiene and Education com-
mittees and was appointed to the state Mental
Health Task Force.
Donohue became the chairman of the task
force in 1979 as well as being elected to the
statewide Board of Directors. He also was
elected regional first vice president and re-
elected local president.
His colleagues on the Board of Directors
elected him to the board’s Budget Committee
in 1979.
He has been employed at Central Islip
Psychiatric Center since 1965, first as a
therapy aide and then as a motor vehicle
operator
Donohue joined CSEA when he was hired
and served as a shop steward before he was
elected local president.
He was born in Brooklyn in 1944, and lived
there until he was drafted into the U.S. Army
in the early 1960s
He is a graduate of Boys High School in
Brooklyn and has taken courses at SUNY Far-
mingdale and Suffolk Community College.
Donohue and his wife, Irene, have two
children, Amy, 7; and Shawn, 3.
Danny Donohue, sitting, discusses plans for the
region during the legislative political campaigns
this fall, Joining Donohue are Region I
Legislative and Political Action Committee Co-
LONG ISLAND REGION I PRESIDENT Danny
Donohue speaks before the New York State
Assembly Educational Task Force Committee
meeting in Hauppauge recently on possible
property tax changes. Donohue told the task
force that public employees should receive fair
and decent wages and safe working conditions
regardless of what changes may occur in the tax
laws.
Danny Donohue is the newest CSEA regional
president, becoming Long Island Region I
president upon the untimely death of Irving
Flaumenbaum on August 27. To better ac-
quaint the membership with Mr. Donohue and
his overall philosophy concerning unionism,
The Public Sector takes this opportunity to
profile the new Region I president.
ioe ee Be
Chairmen Nicholas Abbatiello, right,
Michael Curtin,
1
and
center. Also taking part in the
planning are, from left, Intern John Wellspeak,
John D’Alessandro and Intern Brad Rice, all of
the CSEA-AFSCME Political Office.
Oct. 2 Convention
Breakfast first of
events to project
CSEA into federal
political arena
NIAGARA FALLS — For the first time in
its history, CSEA is getting involved in
political campaigns on the federal level,
and a major event at the union’s Delegates
Meeting here from Sept. 28 to Oct. 3 aims to
make that involvement as effective as
possible.
The event is the Oct. 2 Political Action
Breakfast at the Niagara Hilton Ballroom.
The tax-deductible, five-dollar donations
for the breakfast will be used to back
CSEA-endorsed candidates in the
Congressional, U.S. Senate, and Presiden-
tial elections.
“We urge all delegates to attend,” said
CSEA Political Action Training Specialist
Ramona Gallagher. ‘‘This is a way to put as
much clout as possible behind our en-
dorsements in these important elections.”
Guest speakers at the event will be Barry
Feinstein, chair of the Public Employees
Conference, and Victor Gotbaum, Ex-
ecutive Director of AFSCME D.C. 37.
Tickets will be sold outside the Ballroom
just prior to the breakfast. Election laws
prohibit the sale of these tickets to anyone
who is not a CSEA/AFSCME member.
THE PUBLIC SECTOR, Wednesday, September 24, 1980
Page 9
Paae 10
First segment of salary increase due
effective October 1 for state workers
ALBANY — More than 100,000 CSEA members in
the state’s Administrative, Institutional and
Operational bargaining units will be receiving the
first segment of a salary increase next month under
provisions of the CSEA contracts with the State of
New York.
The current three year contract took effect
following member ratification on April 1, 1979. On
that date a seven percent salary increase was add-
ed to the salary schedule.
Now, starting with the payroll period the first day
of which is closest to October 1, 1980, a three and a
half percent increase will be added to the salary
schedule as the first installment of a salary in-
crease for this fiscal year. Then, after next April 1,
the remainder of this year’s salary increase will be
made in a lump sum payment.
While the procedure for the increases is complex,
the concept is simple. If the computation for the
total salary increase for this fiscal year works out
to seven percent, then an employee doing the same
job this year as last year will receive seven percent
more salary, plus any increments or performance
awards he or she may be entitled to receive. Part of
that seven percent raise comes around October 1,
but the bulk of it comes in lump sum payment after
April 1.
INegstiatione for the present contract yielded the
ALBANY — CSEA’s contracts with the
State of New York in the Administrative,
Institutional and Operational bargaining
units contain provisions for salary in-
creases for new employees that are not
properly reflected in the contracts as
published by the state.
The printed contracts indicate that new
employees aren't eligible for the retroac-
tive lump sum payment for a fiscal year if
they came to work after the start of that
fiscal year. That isn’t correct. eI
CSEA and the Governor’s Office of
Employee Relations (GOER) have notified
union representatives and personnel of-
ficers that the contracts actually provide
for such employees to receive a lump sum
payment pro-rated for their length of ser-
vice during the fiscal year.
GOER has asked personnel offices to so
inform new employees when they are given
copies of their contracts.
In an effort to avoid undue confusion, the
following sections of Article Seven of the
CSEA — State contracts have been printed
here exactly as they appear in the publish-
ed contracts which employees now have.
Readers are cautioned, particularly
employees hired after March 31, 1980, of
the correction.
§ 7.12 For the fiseal year April 1, 1980 to
March 31, 1981 the performance based salary
system deseribed above will continue and a
general salary increase will be provided in the
following manner.
(a) Effeetive October 1, 1980* a general
inerease of 3.5 percent will be applied to base
pay; with the salary schedule increased by 3.5
percent.
(b) Effective April 1, 1981* a percentage
general increase in base pay will be provided
in an amount equal to 7/9ths of one percent
for each one percent inerease in the Consumer
Price Index’ over the period from January
1980 to January 1981, less the 3.5 percent
provided on October 1, 1980; provided, how-
first cost of living adjustment clause ever in a state -
contract, but as with most such adjustments in un-
ion contraets, this adjustment is based on a com-
plex formula that can yield an increase up to a
certain maximum. In this case, the contract
provides for an increase of three and a half percent
plus the cost of living adjustment up to a maximum
total increase of seven percent.
The three and a half percent applied to the salary
schedule on October 1 is the first segment of that in-
crease. The remainder will be paid after the cost of
living adjustment is calculated during the beginn-
ing of the next fiscal year. This deferral allows for
a true calculation of the COLA and allows the state
to ‘‘roll over’’ the salary increase from one fiscal
year into the next fiscal year. This was required by
the state’s continuing fiscal crisis. While it might
seem complicated, it guarantees the employees a
true increase in salary for the entire year.
Other unions representing state employees have
negotiated less complicated payment formulas, but
those formulas do not guarantee a true increase for
the entire year.
Here’s an example of how the system will work
using an employee with a salary of $10,000 per year
as of April 1, 1980.
In the payroll period the first day of which is
closest to October 1, 1980, the employee’s salary is
increased by three and a half percent to an an-
nualized $10,350. For the remainder of this fiscal
year, the employee receives bi-weekly paychecks
based on that annual salary.
After the beginning of the next fiscal year (after
April 1, 1981) the COLA formula is calculated.
Assuming it works out to the maximum amount,
then the employee is “owed” the difference
between what he or she received as a result of the
three and a half percent increase in October, and
what he or she would have received if a seven
percent salary increase had been awarded on April
1, 1980. The difference — in this case $525 — is then
paid to the employee around April 1, 1981, in the
form of a Jump sum check.
The salary schedule is then amended effective
April 1, 1981, to reflect the total salary increase. In
our example, the salary schedule would be amend-
ed on April 1, 1981 to $10,700.
The same procedure is then repeated in the third
year of the contracts.
Article seven, sections 12, 13 and 14 of the con-
tracts for the Administrative, Institutional and
Operational bargaining units provide for the salary
increases. The text of those parts of the contracts is:
reprinted below for your convenience.
For more detailed information or to explain
variations for employees entering, leaving or being
promoted, contact your CSEA representative or
your personnel office.
Verbatim contract language
re: state salary increases
ever, that the total inerease in base pa.
provided as a result of (a) and (b) may not
result in a total salary increase in excess of 7
percent (noncompounded). The general in-
crease of April 1, 1981 will be applied to the-
Salary Schedule.
(ce) Employees in full-time employment
status on March 31, 1980 and who are in
full-time employment status on Mareh 31,
1981** will be entitled to retroactive payment
for service from April 1, 1980 to March 31,
1981 to make up the difference between salary
actually received and the salary rate estab-
lished in the April, 1981 schedule. Such ret-
roactive payment will be made no later than
during the first quarter of the fiscal year
beginning April 1, 1981, and such payment
shall be based upon the base pay and overtime
compensation received by the employee.
(d) Employees in full-time employment
status on September 30, 1980 and who are in
full-time employment status on Mareh 31,
1981** will be entitled to retroactive payment
for service from October 1, 1980 to April 1,
1981 at the rate established as a result of the
April 1, 1981 increase. Such retroactive
payment will be made no later than during
the first quarter of the fiseal year beginning
April 1, 1981.
§ 7.13 Third Year of Agreement
For the fiseal year April 1, 1981 to Mareh
31, 1982 the performance based salary system
will continue and a general salary increase
will be provided in the same manner as in
1980-81; specifieally;
(a) Effeetive October 1, 1981* a general
increase of 3.5 percent will be applied to base
pay; with the salary schedule increased by 3.5
percent. ,
(b) Effective April 1, 1982* a percentage
general increase in base pay will be provided
in an amount equal to 7/9ths of one pereent
for each one percent inerease in the Consumer
Price Index' over the period from January,
1981 to January, 1982, less the 3.5 percent
provided on October 1, 1981; provided, how-
ever, that the total increase in base pay
THE PUBLIC SECTOR. Wednesday. September 24. 1980
provided as a result of (a) and (b) may not
result in a total salary inerease in excess of 7
pereent (non-compounded). The general in-
crease of April 1, 1981 will be applied to the
Salary Schedule.
(c) Employees in full-time employment
status on March 31, 1981 and who are in
full-time employment status on Mareh 31,
1982** will be entitled to a retroactive
payment for service from April 1, 1981 to
March 31, 1982 to make up the difference
between salary actually received and the
salary rate established in the April 1, 1982
schedule. Such retroactive payment will be
made no later than during the first quarter of
the fiseal year beginning April 1, 1982 and
such payment shall be based upon the base
pay and overtime compensation received by
the employee.
(d) Employees in full-time employment
status on September 30, 1981 and who are in
full-time employment status on Mareh 31,
1982** will be entitled to retroactive payment
for service from October 1,-1981 to April 1,
1982 at the rate established as a result of the
April 1, 1982 inerease. Such retroactive
payment will be made no later than during
the first quarter of the fiseal year beginning
April 1, 1982.
§ 7.14 All of the above provisions shall
apply on a pro rata basis to employees paid on
an hourly or per diem basis or on any basis
other than at an annual rate, or to employees
paid on a part-time basis. The above provi-
sions shall not apply to employees paid on a
fee schedule.
*Such increases shall become effective the pay-
roll period nearest to the stated date, as provided
in New York State Finance Law Section 44(¥).
** Provided, however, that employees who die or
retire during the stated period shall reeeive pro
rata payments based on the number of days served
in such full-time employment status during the
stated period.
‘US. All Citie:
Clerical Workers Re
Urban Wage Earners anel
sec
Manhattan Psy employees fear for lives
after decision to give patients knives
MANHATTAN — Mental hygiene therapy
aides at Manhattan Psychiatric Center,
members of Local 413, are working in constant
fear for their lives since a decision by
management to supply patients with knives and
forks during meals.
Patients are stealing the utensils, arming
themselves, and threatening workers and fellow
patients, according to Local 413 President
Ismael Lopez.
Therapy aides have had to step in to stop three
knife fights between patients, and at least eight
knives are missing since the policy change
several weeks ago.
In addition, patients have repeatedly threaten-
ed to stab-to-death therapy aides, according to
reports. ‘‘With armed patients I’m afraid to walk
the halls or ride the elevators alone,” said one
aide who refused to give her name. ‘‘I’m afraid
of a patient stabbing me in the back.”’
One patient said a voice told him to kill me, an
obviously shaken female aide said. She said she
had received two facial scars as a result of three
attacks before knives and forks were easily
available. ‘‘Now I'm in constant fear for my
life,” she said.
Patients had previously had their food cut up
for them by food service personnel before it was
served. They had been given only spoons to eat
with. The new procedure had been implemented
as a more humane way of treating patients, ac-
cording to facility Director Dr. Gabriel Koz. The
gratification of using knives and forks goes a
Several honored
in Rockland unit
ORANGEBURG — The Rockland Children’s Psychiatric Center
Unit of Rockland Psychiatric Center Local 421 honored a number of the
unit’s active members recently.
‘The RCPC Unit had completed its first year as a unit of Local 421.
Unit President Willie Trotman presented plaques and letters of
appreciation to RCPC members, including:
Glenda Davis, grievance committee chairman; Pat Taylor,
secretary; James Phillips, vice president; Betty Davis and Haywood
Corry, both grievance committee; Mary Bullock, fund-raising committee
chairman; and Lisa Shumate, Robert Ellison and John Thomason, all ex-
ecutive board members.
Trotman also presented plaques to Local 421 President Eva Katz and
Executive Vice President Robert Coleman.
The program also served as a way for the unit to show its
appreciation to Phillips and Corry who were leaving the unit and return-
ing to RPC as members of the staff of a new on-grounds transitional
facility.
long way toward rehabilitation, according to
Koz.
But Mohamed Hussain, chairman of the
Local's Grievance Committee, said: ‘‘If the
policy of giving what could be termed ‘deadly
weapons’ to the patients continues, there will
very likely be extremely serious problems at
Manhattan Psychiatric.
“TI will hold the Mental Health commissioner
personally responsible for any employee or
patient death resulting from this improper
policy,’ he said. ‘‘I wonder if he would like to
have a death at the facility on his conscience?”
According to Field Representative Bart Brier,
“the real problem at Manhattan Psychiatric is
understaffing. It’s not that we are against
treating patients humanely by giving them
proper eating tools, but we are against giving
patients items that can be used as deadly
weapons. What is missing here is adequate staff
supervision and adequate staff.’’
He said it is common practice to have 40 to 50
patients dining while being supervised by only
two therapy aides. ‘‘What is needed are at least
33 more dining room attendants,’ he said. ‘‘That
would go a long way towards solving the dining
room problems.”
Patient slashed with knife
A patient at Manhattan Psychiatric Center
was seriously injured recently when he was
slashed in the neck twice with a serrated
knife, during a fight with another patient.
The fight was broken up by mental hygiene
therapy aides, members of Local 413, assign-
ed to the ward. The incident is the latest and
most serious in a series of attempted stab-
bings since the facility changed its policy and
began supplying patients with knives and
forks during their meals. They had previously
been served only pre-cut food and spoons.
The incident took place while 38 patients,
supervised by only two therapy aides, were
eating. in the Kirby Building dining room:-Ac-
cording to Mohamed Hussain, second vice-
president of the Local, the patient said he was
urged to stab the other patient because a voice
told him to do so, Hussain said the patient was
put into seclusion for several hours, and then
allowed back into the ward.
ROCKLAND CHILDREN’S PSYCHIATRIC
CENTER UNIT PRESIDENT Willie Trotman,
right, congratulates unit Vice President James
Phillips, left, Rockland Psychiatric Center (RPC)
Local President Eva Katz, and grievance com-
mittee members Haywood Corry on their transfer
to a new on-grounds transitional facility at RPC.
Katz, Phillips and Corry received plaques from
Trotman.
RECEIVING PLAQUES AND LETTERS OF
APPRECIATION from the Rockland Children’s
Psychiatric Center (RCPC) Unit of Rockland
Psychiatric Center Local 421 are, from left, Local
421 Executive Vice President Robert Coleman and »
RCPC Unit officials Glenda Davis, Pat Taylor, Lisa
Shumate, Mary Bullock, Robert Ellison, Betty
Davis and John Thomason.
THE PUBLIC SECTOR, Wednesday, September 24, 1980
Page 11
NIAGARA FALLS — CSEA Delegates
meeting here starting September 28th will find
that this Fall Delegates Meeting is a little unlike
any meeting that they have encountered in the
past.
Delegates will be meeting in shorter, but more
intensive business sessions based upon a model
used successfully by AFSCME.
The system actually eliminates the traditional
lunch break in the middle of a Delegate session
and replaces it with a continuous session that
starts a little later and ends a little earlier. The
general business meetings at this Convention
will begin at 10 a.m. and run continuously until 3
p.m.
It is expected that the new format will allow
for continuity in the debate on various subjects
and prevent long delays from affecting the
sessions. Delegates will also be spared the con-
fusion of searching for a place to have lunch
while worrying about getting back to sessions on
time.
Another innovation borrowed from the Inter-
national’s convention structure, is the schedul-
ing of reports of committees in advance of the
actual Delegate business sessions.
Unlike past years when committees gave
reports for the first time on the floor of the
Delegate meeting where they were discussed
and questions and answers exchanged on the
floor, the new structure will have committees
available on the Monday and Tuesday
preceding the Delegate business meetings to
NIAGARA FALLS — Delegates representing
CSEA’s State and County Divisions will go
separate ways for a brief time at next week’s
Delegates meeting when the traditional. State
Departmental Meetings and County Delegate
Panel Discussions allow Delegates to get up-to-
date information on new problems confronting
their constituents.
In the State Division, these meetings are held
by Department where there appears to be a need
to exchange current information. On Monday,
September 29th, Delegates will have the oppor-
tunity to attend any of eleven different
meetings. Scheduled are Departmental
meetings for: Office of Mental Health, Office of
Mental Retardation, Department of Transpor-
tation, Social Services, Correctional Services,
Judiciary, Authorities, State University, En-
vironmental Conservation, Executive and
Health.
Also on Monday, County Division Delegates
will have three major panel discussions in areas
of interest. One panel session will deal with
Statewide Probation issues. Another is schedul-
ed on Statewide Social Services issues affecting
CSEA members in local government. The third
panel discussion is scheduled for Non-Teaching
speakers throughout the sessions.
the delegates at 11 a.m. Wednesday, October 1.
at 1 p.m.
ormat will streamline sessions
at 70th annual delegate meeting
Many distinguished speakers
to address union delegates
NIAGARA FALLS — Delegates to CSEA’s Seventieth Annual
Delegates Meeting are scheduled to hear a number of distinguished
AFSCME International President Jerry Wurf is scheduled to address
Assembly Speaker Stanley Fink will speak at 1 p.m. the same day.
On Thursday, October 2, New York State Lt. Governor Mario Cuomo is
scheduled to address the delegation at 11 a.m., followed by James Farmer,
Executive Director of the Coalition of American Public Employees
(CAPE), at noon, and Senate Majority Leader Warren Anderson will speak
On Friday, October 3, Niagara Falls Assemblyman Joseph Pillittere
will speak at 10:45 a.m. In addition, Niagara Falls Mayor Michael
O’Laughlin will welcome delegates to the city during a delegate orientation
program from 5-7 p.m. on Sunday, September 28.
give their reports to any interested Delegates
and answer any questions or take input from
Delegates on any related subjects.
It is expected that this procedure will speed
the actual committee business at the Delegate
meetings and allow individual Delegates to ask
any questions they wish without being concerned
about delaying the proceedings of the entire
Convention.
Committees tentatively scheduled to report at
this meeting include: Constitution and By-Laws,
Methods and Procedures, Insurance, Convention
Motions, Armory, Legislative and Political Ac-
tion, These committees will hold forums on
Monday, September 29.
On that same day there will also be a forum
for the Treasurer’s Report.
Tuesday, September 30, will see forums for
the following committees: Education, Legal, Ad
Hoc Women’s Committee, Human Rights, Civil
Service, Communications, Statewide Safety,
CETA, Retirees, Membership, and the Ad Hoc
Minorities Committee.
Actual times and locations for these meetings
will be in the Delegate’s agendas which they
receive when they register at the Convention
Center.
More compressed Delegate sessions and a new
committee reporting structure are two in-
novations CSEA will be using in Niagara Falls to
make the 1980 Fall Delegates meeting as
productive and convenient as possible.
Meetings, forums scheduled
School Employees and will deal with major
problems confronting that segment of the
union’s membership.
Other special informational sessions for in-
terested Delegates have been scheduled for
Monday dealing with parliamentary procedure,
basic negotiations, union motivation and inter-
nal organizing, préretirement counseling,
safety, political action, affirmative action and a
seminar for Local and Unit Treasurers.
Also on Tuesday, an open educational forum
will be held for all Delegates on the subject of
CSEA’s affiliation with the American
Federation of State, County and Municipal
Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO. The af-
filiation will be a major topic of discussion
within CSEA between now and April when the
present affiliation agreement expires.
Delegates will ultimately vote on the af-
filiation’s continuance, so this session is to
answer questions and provide information on
this most important subject.
Delegates will not be acting on the affiliation
at this meeting, but the educational session will
be the first step in an information campaign to
prepare for the decisions the Delegates will be
making later on in the year.
Stanley Fink
Page 12
THE PUBLIC SECTOR, Wednesday, September 24, 1980
NIAGARA FALLS — CSEA’s five day
Delegate’s Meeting convenes at 5 p.m., Sun-
day, September 28th and continues through
Friday, October 3.
Since Delegate meetings are a vital part of
CSEA, the stories presented here are for the
information of all union members as well as
elected Delegates.
Registration for Delegates will be held
from 3 to 6 p.m. on Sunday at the Niagara
Falls Convention Center and from 8:30 a.m.
to 5 p.m. on Monday through Thursday at the
same location.
Following the convening of the delegates on
Sunday, September 28, the first delegate’s
business session will be held at 8:30 a.m. on
Monday, September 29. This session, to deal
with the mechanics of the election of an Inter-
national Vice President to AFSCME from
CSEA, was not listed in the tentative
schedules sent to delegates a week ago.
New vice president
election scheduled
NIAGARA FALLS — An election of an Inter-
national Vice President to the Executive Board
of AFSCME is one of the many topics to be
handled at next week's meeting of CSEA’s
Delegates.
The vacancy stems from the recent death of
Irving Flaumenbaum, Region One President,
who served as a CSEA/AFSCME International
Vice President with union President William L.
McGowan. Mr. Flaumenbaum had just begun a
four year term at the time of his death. Both
CSEA International Vice Presidents were
elected by the union’s 223 elected Delegates to
the AFSCME International Convention held in
June in Anaheim, California. ~
After researching applicable regulations of
AFSCME, CSEA Chief Counsel James Roemer
has outlined the procedures for the new election.
Mr. Roemer explains that as a result of a
review of the procedures for such elections, the
223 CSEA Delegates to the International's
Convention will meet at Niagara Falls on
Tuesday, September 30, to elect a new represen-
tative to join President McGowan on AFSCME’’s
International Executive Board.
As a result of technical provisions of the
AFSCME Constitution, CSEA’s Delegates will
meet on Monday morning, September 29th, to
consider a resolution to empower the election of
a new International Vice President.
While CSEA rank and file members did elect
all 223 delegates to the International’s
Convention in June, the vote of the CSEA
Delegates to the Niagara Falls Convention will
be required to authorize this election procedure.
Details on the election procedures will be
presented to the Delegate body at their Monday
morning meeting.
Mario Cuomo
Warren Anderson
