"Charette Presentation." Microsoft PowerPoint file. 24 slides., 2000 April 21

Online content

Fullscreen 
Charrette # 3
Developing the Vision
Charrette # 3
Developing the Vision
April 21, 2001
April 21, 2001
Review the Results of Technical Analysis
Review the Results of Technical Analysis
Smart Growth
Smart Growth
Land Use Transportation Index
Land Use Transportation Index
Traffic Assignment
Traffic Assignment
Address Challenges
Address Challenges
Develop a Preferred Land Use Scenario
Develop a Preferred Land Use Scenario
Trend, Open Space, Village Center, Business
Trend, Open Space, Village Center, Business
Planning Areas
Planning Areas
Review the Results of Technical Analysis
Review the Results of Technical Analysis
Smart Growth
Smart Growth
Land Use Transportation Index
Land Use Transportation Index
Traffic Assignment
Traffic Assignment
Address Challenges
Address Challenges
Develop a Preferred Land Use Scenario
Develop a Preferred Land Use Scenario
Trend, Open Space, Village Center, Business
Trend, Open Space, Village Center, Business
Planning Areas
Planning Areas
Purpose of this Charette
Purpose of this Charette
Purpose of this Charette
Purpose of this Charette
Citizens Advisory Committee
Citizens Advisory Committee
Preferred Scenario
Preferred Scenario
Analytical Results
Analytical Results
Neighborhood Mtgs.
Neighborhood Mtgs.
Preferred Scenario
Preferred Scenario
Transportation Improvements
Transportation Improvements
Citizen Advisory Committee
Citizen Advisory Committee
Citizens Advisory Committee
Citizens Advisory Committee
Preferred Scenario
Preferred Scenario
Analytical Results
Analytical Results
Neighborhood Mtgs.
Neighborhood Mtgs.
Preferred Scenario
Preferred Scenario
Transportation Improvements
Transportation Improvements
Citizen Advisory Committee
Citizen Advisory Committee
Next Steps
Next Steps
Next Steps
Next Steps
Future Development Scenarios
Future Development Scenarios
Future Development Scenarios
Future Development Scenarios
Existing Conditions - Current baseline conditions
Existing Conditions - Current baseline conditions
Trend - 2020 levels based on current land use trends
Trend - 2020 levels based on current land use trends
Open Space - Limitation of future development and 
Open Space - Limitation of future development and 
preservation of open space
preservation of open space
Village Center - Three defined Village Center areas
Village Center - Three defined Village Center areas
Business Emphasis - Large-scale business and commercial 
Business Emphasis - Large-scale business and commercial 
areas
areas
Existing Conditions - Current baseline conditions
Existing Conditions - Current baseline conditions
Trend - 2020 levels based on current land use trends
Trend - 2020 levels based on current land use trends
Open Space - Limitation of future development and 
Open Space - Limitation of future development and 
preservation of open space
preservation of open space
Village Center - Three defined Village Center areas
Village Center - Three defined Village Center areas
Business Emphasis - Large-scale business and commercial 
Business Emphasis - Large-scale business and commercial 
areas
areas
Trend Scenario
Trend Scenario
Trend Scenario
Trend Scenario
2020 levels based on current land use trends
2020 levels based on current land use trends  
Historic direction without intervention
Historic direction without intervention
Spatial Distribution - Spread Rather than Focus
Spatial Distribution - Spread Rather than Focus
Additional Residential Units - 150
Additional Residential Units - 150
Theoretical basis for evaluation
Theoretical basis for evaluation
2020 levels based on current land use trends
2020 levels based on current land use trends  
Historic direction without intervention
Historic direction without intervention
Spatial Distribution - Spread Rather than Focus
Spatial Distribution - Spread Rather than Focus
Additional Residential Units - 150
Additional Residential Units - 150
Theoretical basis for evaluation
Theoretical basis for evaluation
What are the Analytical Tools?
What are the Analytical Tools?
What are the Analytical Tools?
What are the Analytical Tools?
USEPA’s Smart Growth Index
USEPA’s Smart Growth Index
Transportation - Land Use Index
Transportation - Land Use Index
Traffic Assignments/Level of Service
Traffic Assignments/Level of Service
USEPA’s Smart Growth Index
USEPA’s Smart Growth Index
Transportation - Land Use Index
Transportation - Land Use Index
Traffic Assignments/Level of Service
Traffic Assignments/Level of Service
Why Use Models?
Why Use Models?
Why Use Models?
Why Use Models?
Compare alternative scenarios to base conditions 
Compare alternative scenarios to base conditions 
- future trend
- future trend
Illustrate strengths, weaknesses, and applicability 
Illustrate strengths, weaknesses, and applicability 
of each scenario
of each scenario
  Just 
Just one
one of several inputs
 of several inputs
Compare alternative scenarios to base conditions 
Compare alternative scenarios to base conditions 
- future trend
- future trend
Illustrate strengths, weaknesses, and applicability 
Illustrate strengths, weaknesses, and applicability 
of each scenario
of each scenario
  Just 
Just one
one of several inputs
 of several inputs
Analytical Assumptions
Analytical Assumptions
Analytical Assumptions
Analytical Assumptions
RPC Residential Units: 400
RPC Residential Units: 400
Base Residential Units: 5,100 (existing)
Base Residential Units: 5,100 (existing)
Additional Residential Units in Village: 250
Additional Residential Units in Village: 250
Additional Residential Units in Trend: 150
Additional Residential Units in Trend: 150
Lowe’s Development in all scenarios
Lowe’s Development in all scenarios
RPC Residential Units: 400
RPC Residential Units: 400
Base Residential Units: 5,100 (existing)
Base Residential Units: 5,100 (existing)
Additional Residential Units in Village: 250
Additional Residential Units in Village: 250
Additional Residential Units in Trend: 150
Additional Residential Units in Trend: 150
Lowe’s Development in all scenarios
Lowe’s Development in all scenarios
Background of Smart Growth Index (SGI)
Background of Smart Growth Index (SGI)
Background of Smart Growth Index (SGI)
Background of Smart Growth Index (SGI)
Smart Growth Index - US Environmental Protection 
Smart Growth Index - US Environmental Protection 
Agency
Agency
Beta-test this model for the Route 303 Study
Beta-test this model for the Route 303 Study
Trial application of this model corridor wide
Trial application of this model corridor wide
Physical condition, urban design
Physical condition, urban design
Oriented to large growth development (RPC 
Oriented to large growth development (RPC 
Redevelopment)
Redevelopment)
Smart Growth Index - US Environmental Protection 
Smart Growth Index - US Environmental Protection 
Agency
Agency
Beta-test this model for the Route 303 Study
Beta-test this model for the Route 303 Study
Trial application of this model corridor wide
Trial application of this model corridor wide
Physical condition, urban design
Physical condition, urban design
Oriented to large growth development (RPC 
Oriented to large growth development (RPC 
Redevelopment)
Redevelopment)
SGI - Indicators
SGI - Indicators
Land Use
Land Use  
– Population Density
Population Density
– Use Mix
Use Mix
– Jobs/workers balance
Jobs/workers balance
– Diversity
Diversity
Housing
Housing
– Residential Density
Residential Density
– Single and multiple family 
Single and multiple family 
housing, open space shares
housing, open space shares
– Housing – transit proximity
Housing – transit proximity
– Water Consumption
Water Consumption
Employment
Employment
– Employment Density
Employment Density
– Employment – transit proximity
Employment – transit proximity
Land Use
Land Use  
– Population Density
Population Density
– Use Mix
Use Mix
– Jobs/workers balance
Jobs/workers balance
– Diversity
Diversity
Housing
Housing
– Residential Density
Residential Density
– Single and multiple family 
Single and multiple family 
housing, open space shares
housing, open space shares
– Housing – transit proximity
Housing – transit proximity
– Water Consumption
Water Consumption
Employment
Employment
– Employment Density
Employment Density
– Employment – transit proximity
Employment – transit proximity
Travel
Travel
– Sidewalk Directness
Sidewalk Directness
– Pedestrian Route/Design
Pedestrian Route/Design
– Street Network/Connectivity
Street Network/Connectivity
– Vehicle miles of travel
Vehicle miles of travel
– Vehicle Trips
Vehicle Trips
– Auto Travel Costs
Auto Travel Costs
Residential Energy
Residential Energy
Environment
Environment
– Open Space
Open Space
– Park Space Availability
Park Space Availability
– Emissions
Emissions
Travel
Travel
– Sidewalk Directness
Sidewalk Directness
– Pedestrian Route/Design
Pedestrian Route/Design
– Street Network/Connectivity
Street Network/Connectivity
– Vehicle miles of travel
Vehicle miles of travel
– Vehicle Trips
Vehicle Trips
– Auto Travel Costs
Auto Travel Costs
Residential Energy
Residential Energy
Environment
Environment
– Open Space
Open Space
– Park Space Availability
Park Space Availability
– Emissions
Emissions
Preliminary SGI Results
Preliminary SGI Results
Preliminary SGI Results
Preliminary SGI Results
All scenarios ranked closely together 
All scenarios ranked closely together 
Problem: Future development is a small share of total 
Problem: Future development is a small share of total 
development
development
Open Space produces least land use impact
Open Space produces least land use impact
Village Center results in a better balance of housing and 
Village Center results in a better balance of housing and 
employment
employment
Village Center allows more non-auto travel to work and shop
Village Center allows more non-auto travel to work and shop
All scenarios ranked closely together 
All scenarios ranked closely together 
Problem: Future development is a small share of total 
Problem: Future development is a small share of total 
development
development
Open Space produces least land use impact
Open Space produces least land use impact
Village Center results in a better balance of housing and 
Village Center results in a better balance of housing and 
employment
employment
Village Center allows more non-auto travel to work and shop
Village Center allows more non-auto travel to work and shop
The Transportation-Land Use Index
The Transportation-Land Use Index
Facilitate Comparison of Transportation and Land 
Facilitate Comparison of Transportation and Land 
Use Strategies
Use Strategies
Measure the Efficiency of Land Use Forms and 
Measure the Efficiency of Land Use Forms and 
Patterns in Terms of Vehicle Use per Capita or per 
Patterns in Terms of Vehicle Use per Capita or per 
Employee
Employee
Traffic Demand, Twenty-four Hours
Traffic Demand, Twenty-four Hours
Compares Production (Residential) and Attraction 
Compares Production (Residential) and Attraction 
(Commercial, Office, Retail, etc.)
(Commercial, Office, Retail, etc.)
Facilitate Comparison of Transportation and Land 
Facilitate Comparison of Transportation and Land 
Use Strategies
Use Strategies
Measure the Efficiency of Land Use Forms and 
Measure the Efficiency of Land Use Forms and 
Patterns in Terms of Vehicle Use per Capita or per 
Patterns in Terms of Vehicle Use per Capita or per 
Employee
Employee
Traffic Demand, Twenty-four Hours
Traffic Demand, Twenty-four Hours
Compares Production (Residential) and Attraction 
Compares Production (Residential) and Attraction 
(Commercial, Office, Retail, etc.)
(Commercial, Office, Retail, etc.)
Land Use Influence on Transportation
Land Use Influence on Transportation
A Land Use Pattern That Encourages 
A Land Use Pattern That Encourages More
More  
Vehicular Use is 
Vehicular Use is Less
Less Efficient;
 Efficient;
Conversely, a Land Use Pattern that Encourages 
Conversely, a Land Use Pattern that Encourages 
Less
Less Vehicular Use Is 
 Vehicular Use Is More
More Efficient;
 Efficient;
Therefore, a Land Use Pattern that 
Therefore, a Land Use Pattern that Complements
Complements  
the Development of Alternative Modes is 
the Development of Alternative Modes is More
More  
Efficient
Efficient
A Land Use Pattern That Encourages 
A Land Use Pattern That Encourages More
More  
Vehicular Use is 
Vehicular Use is Less
Less Efficient;
 Efficient;
Conversely, a Land Use Pattern that Encourages 
Conversely, a Land Use Pattern that Encourages 
Less
Less Vehicular Use Is 
 Vehicular Use Is More
More Efficient;
 Efficient;
Therefore, a Land Use Pattern that 
Therefore, a Land Use Pattern that Complements
Complements  
the Development of Alternative Modes is 
the Development of Alternative Modes is More
More  
Efficient
Efficient
The Transportation-Land Use Index
The Transportation-Land Use Index
In the Trend Scenario
In the Trend Scenario
Vehicle Trips produced increase 10.3%
Vehicle Trips produced increase 10.3%
Vehicle Trips attracted increase 38.6% 
Vehicle Trips attracted increase 38.6% 
For the Production Analysis (Residential)
For the Production Analysis (Residential)
Open Space and Village Center Lowest Vehicle Hours per 
Open Space and Village Center Lowest Vehicle Hours per 
Capita for Orangeburg & Tappan
Capita for Orangeburg & Tappan
Business Emphasis Fewest Trips & Lowest Index for 
Business Emphasis Fewest Trips & Lowest Index for 
Bradley
Bradley
In the Trend Scenario
In the Trend Scenario
Vehicle Trips produced increase 10.3%
Vehicle Trips produced increase 10.3%
Vehicle Trips attracted increase 38.6% 
Vehicle Trips attracted increase 38.6% 
For the Production Analysis (Residential)
For the Production Analysis (Residential)
Open Space and Village Center Lowest Vehicle Hours per 
Open Space and Village Center Lowest Vehicle Hours per 
Capita for Orangeburg & Tappan
Capita for Orangeburg & Tappan
Business Emphasis Fewest Trips & Lowest Index for 
Business Emphasis Fewest Trips & Lowest Index for 
Bradley
Bradley
The Transportation-Land Use Index
The Transportation-Land Use Index
For the Attraction Analysis
For the Attraction Analysis
Open Space has the lowest number of vehicle trips , but 
Open Space has the lowest number of vehicle trips , but 
is the least efficient with an index of 1.098
is the least efficient with an index of 1.098
Business Emphasis for Bradley area greater number of 
Business Emphasis for Bradley area greater number of 
trips & best index (No retail).
trips & best index (No retail).
Open Space and Village Center nearly equal for Tappan
Open Space and Village Center nearly equal for Tappan
Village Center is the most efficient for Orangeburg/ 
Village Center is the most efficient for Orangeburg/ 
Blauvelt
Blauvelt
For the Attraction Analysis
For the Attraction Analysis
Open Space has the lowest number of vehicle trips , but 
Open Space has the lowest number of vehicle trips , but 
is the least efficient with an index of 1.098
is the least efficient with an index of 1.098
Business Emphasis for Bradley area greater number of 
Business Emphasis for Bradley area greater number of 
trips & best index (No retail).
trips & best index (No retail).
Open Space and Village Center nearly equal for Tappan
Open Space and Village Center nearly equal for Tappan
Village Center is the most efficient for Orangeburg/ 
Village Center is the most efficient for Orangeburg/ 
Blauvelt
Blauvelt
Traffic Assignment
Traffic Assignment
Classic Approach to Development Analysis 
Classic Approach to Development Analysis 
Peak Hours - AM & PM
Peak Hours - AM & PM
Considers Impacts of Regional - Pass Through Traffic
Considers Impacts of Regional - Pass Through Traffic
Trip Generation and Attraction
Trip Generation and Attraction
Pass-by Traffic & Mixed Use Credit
Pass-by Traffic & Mixed Use Credit
Classic Approach to Development Analysis 
Classic Approach to Development Analysis 
Peak Hours - AM & PM
Peak Hours - AM & PM
Considers Impacts of Regional - Pass Through Traffic
Considers Impacts of Regional - Pass Through Traffic
Trip Generation and Attraction
Trip Generation and Attraction
Pass-by Traffic & Mixed Use Credit
Pass-by Traffic & Mixed Use Credit
Traffic Assignment Results
Traffic Assignment Results
Many corridor intersections are already at or near capacity, 
Many corridor intersections are already at or near capacity, 
particularly in the evening peak
particularly in the evening peak
Existing Condition:
Existing Condition:
Signalized LOS F Intersections: Three - Oak Tree, Kings Hwy. 
Signalized LOS F Intersections: Three - Oak Tree, Kings Hwy. 
So., and Orangeburg Rd. 
So., and Orangeburg Rd. 
Trend Analysis:
Trend Analysis:
Signalized LOS F Intersections:  All 
Signalized LOS F Intersections:  All 
Development Themes
Development Themes
Signalized LOS F Intersections:  All 
Signalized LOS F Intersections:  All 
Many corridor intersections are already at or near capacity, 
Many corridor intersections are already at or near capacity, 
particularly in the evening peak
particularly in the evening peak
Existing Condition:
Existing Condition:
Signalized LOS F Intersections: Three - Oak Tree, Kings Hwy. 
Signalized LOS F Intersections: Three - Oak Tree, Kings Hwy. 
So., and Orangeburg Rd. 
So., and Orangeburg Rd. 
Trend Analysis:
Trend Analysis:
Signalized LOS F Intersections:  All 
Signalized LOS F Intersections:  All 
Development Themes
Development Themes
Signalized LOS F Intersections:  All 
Signalized LOS F Intersections:  All 
Traffic Assignment Results
Traffic Assignment Results
Traffic increases from least to most - Open Space, Village 
Traffic increases from least to most - Open Space, Village 
Center, Trend, and Business Emphasis
Center, Trend, and Business Emphasis
Traffic Improvements will relieve, but not solve congestion.
Traffic Improvements will relieve, but not solve congestion.
Left Turn Pockets North and South Bound & On Selected Side 
Left Turn Pockets North and South Bound & On Selected Side 
Streets
Streets
Trend: Four LOS F
Trend: Four LOS F
Business: Four LOS F
Business: Four LOS F
Village Center: Two LOS F
Village Center: Two LOS F
Open Space: Two LOS D at Orangeburg Road & Mountain View
Open Space: Two LOS D at Orangeburg Road & Mountain View
Traffic increases from least to most - Open Space, Village 
Traffic increases from least to most - Open Space, Village 
Center, Trend, and Business Emphasis
Center, Trend, and Business Emphasis
Traffic Improvements will relieve, but not solve congestion.
Traffic Improvements will relieve, but not solve congestion.
Left Turn Pockets North and South Bound & On Selected Side 
Left Turn Pockets North and South Bound & On Selected Side 
Streets
Streets
Trend: Four LOS F
Trend: Four LOS F
Business: Four LOS F
Business: Four LOS F
Village Center: Two LOS F
Village Center: Two LOS F
Open Space: Two LOS D at Orangeburg Road & Mountain View
Open Space: Two LOS D at Orangeburg Road & Mountain View
Birchwood
Corporate
Bradley
Leber
Greenbush
Greenbush
Erie
Spruce
Mountainview
Kings Hwy
Orangeburg
Greenbush
Western Hwy
Palisades Interstate Parkway
Kings Hwy
Oak Tree
Washington
West Shore RR
Exit 5
287
New York
New Jersey
Clarkstown
Orangetown
Palisades
Center
Mall
Glenshaw
Campbell
TAPPAN
BLAUVELT
ORANGEBURG
WEST
NYACK
Clarkstown
Landfill
Bradley
Corporate
Park
St. Thomas
Aquinas
College
Clausland
Mountain
Park
Blauvelt
State
Park
Western Hwy
59
303
340
Cottage
Lane
Elementary
Blauvelt
Library
Interstate
Distribution
Center
Dominican
College
Long Island U.
Graduate Campus
Tappan Zee
High School
IONA
College
Town
Hall
Orangeburg
Library
Orangetown
Highway and
Sewer Depts.
Tappan
Library
DeWint
House
Worldwide
Industrial
Park /
NicePak
April 3, 2001
WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
P.M. SCENARIO INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE
ROUTE 303 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STUDY
N
No Scale
SOURCE: TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS, 2001
LEGEND
Overall LOS
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
LOS worse than F
--
--
--
--
--
Existing
C
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
F
C
F
F
F
F
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Birchwood
Corporate
Bradley
Leber
Greenbush
Greenbush
Erie
Spruce
Mountainview
Kings Hwy
Orangeburg
Greenbush
Western Hwy
Palisades Interstate Parkway
Kings Hwy
Oak Tree
Washington
West Shore RR
Exit 5
287
New York
New Jersey
Clarkstown
Orangetown
Palisades
Center
Mall
Glenshaw
Campbell
TAPPAN
BLAUVELT
ORANGEBURG
WEST
NYACK
Clarkstown
Landfill
Bradley
Corporate
Park
St. Thomas
Aquinas
College
Clausland
Mountain
Park
Blauvelt
State
Park
Western Hwy
59
303
340
Cottage
Lane
Elementary
Blauvelt
Library
Interstate
Distribution
Center
Dominican
College
Long Island U.
Graduate Campus
Tappan Zee
High School
IONA
College
Town
Hall
Orangeburg
Library
Orangetown
Highway and
Sewer Depts.
Tappan
Library
DeWint
House
Worldwide
Industrial
Park /
NicePak
April 3, 2001
WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
P.M. SCENARIO LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH IMPROVEMENTS
ROUTE 303 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STUDY
N
No Scale
SOURCE: TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS, 2001
C
E
C
C
E
C
D
C
C
D
D
F
D
E
F
F
D
E
F
F
F
E
F
F
F
C
C
C
C
F
D
F
E
F
F
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
Existing
Note: Generally, improvements include north and south left turn  
          pockets, and left turn pockets at selected side street locations.
LEGEND
Overall LOS
Trend
Open
Space
Village
Center
Business
Emphasis
--
--
--
--
--
Existing
* -Existing Unimproved 
Birchwood
Corporate
Bradley
Leber
Greenbush
Greenbush
Erie
Spruce
Mountainview
Kings Hwy
Orangeburg
Greenbush
Western Hwy
Palisades Interstate Parkway
Kings Hwy
Oak Tree
Washington
West Shore RR
Exit 5
287
New York
New Jersey
Clarkstown
Orangetown
Palisades
Center
Mall
Glenshaw
Campbell
TAPPAN
BLAUVELT
ORANGEBURG
WEST
NYACK
Clarkstown
Landfill
Bradley
Corporate
Park
St. Thomas
Aquinas
College
Clausland
Mountain
Park
Blauvelt
State
Park
Western Hwy
59
303
340
Cottage
Lane
Elementary
Blauvelt
Library
Interstate
Distribution
Center
Dominican
College
Long Island U.
Graduate Campus
Tappan Zee
High School
IONA
College
Town
Hall
Orangeburg
Library
Orangetown
Highway and
Sewer Depts.
Tappan
Library
DeWint
House
Worldwide
Industrial
Park /
NicePak
April 3, 2001
WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES
EVALUATION RESULTS
ROUTE 303 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STUDY
N
No Scale
SMART GROWTH
INDEX
(BEST SCENARIO)
LAND USE
TRANSPORTATION
INDEX
(MOST EFFICIENT)
TRAFFIC
ASSIGNMENTS
(LEVEL OF SERVICE)
LAND USE:
OPEN SPACE
ATTRACTION ANALYSIS:
BUSINESS EMPHASIS
NO
LEVEL
OF 
SERVICE
F
HOUSING:
TREND
PRODUCTION ANALYSIS:
BUSINESS EMPHASIS
EMPLOYMENT:
BUSINESS EMPHASIS
TRAVEL:
VILLAGE CENTER
ATTRACTION ANALYSIS:
VILLAGE & TREND
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY:
VILLAGE CENTER
PRODUCTION ANALYSIS:
OPEN SPACE &
VILLAGE CENTER
ENVIRONMENT:
VILLAGE CENTER
OPEN SPACE:
NO LEVEL
OF SERVICE F
VILLAGE
CENTER:
OVERALL:
VILLAGE CENTER
PRODUCTION ANALYSIS:
OPEN SPACE &
VILLAGE CENTER
VILLAGE CENTER &
BUSINESS EMPHASIS:
OPEN SPACE:
NO LEVEL
OF SERVICE F
ATTRACTION ANALYSIS
OPEN SPACE
What Does It All Mean?
What Does It All Mean?
No one scenario is the perfect answer
No one scenario is the perfect answer
Results vary by corridor region
Results vary by corridor region
Control of development
Control of development
Reduce future travel and traffic congestion
Reduce future travel and traffic congestion
Will not change basic travel patterns
Will not change basic travel patterns
Village Center development 
Village Center development 
Greater use of transit
Greater use of transit
Enhance existing residential and commercial neighborhoods
Enhance existing residential and commercial neighborhoods
No one scenario is the perfect answer
No one scenario is the perfect answer
Results vary by corridor region
Results vary by corridor region
Control of development
Control of development
Reduce future travel and traffic congestion
Reduce future travel and traffic congestion
Will not change basic travel patterns
Will not change basic travel patterns
Village Center development 
Village Center development 
Greater use of transit
Greater use of transit
Enhance existing residential and commercial neighborhoods
Enhance existing residential and commercial neighborhoods
Scenario Performance Summary
Scenario Performance Summary

Metadata

Containers:
PPT 1
Resource Type:
Slides
Rights:
Image for license or rights statement.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Date Uploaded:
May 8, 2019

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this record group is unrestricted.
Collection terms of access:
The University Archives are eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

About the Archives

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Ask a Question Book a Meet

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.

Schedule a Visit Hours