VADP Support a Moratorium Flyer-Cost, 2009 January 16

Online content

Fullscreen
@ Support a Moratorium on the
VIRGINIANS FOR Death Penalty &

ALTERNATIVES Save the Taxpayers of Virginia Unnecessary Costs

TO THE DEATH PENALTY

Why a Moratorium?
e The capital justice system in Virginia is broken and it is crucial to take a time out and
examine these issues - it is a matter of life and death!
e Numerous states have studied the cost of the death penalty and found that the death penalty
costs taxpayers more than life imprisonment.

What does the death penalty cost?
¢ No cost study has yet been done in VIRGINIA, but the data from other studies demonstrates the
cost savings that Virginia could benefit from by eliminating the death penalty.
e NORTH CAROLINA taxpayers spend $2.16 million per execution over the costs of
sentencing murderers to life imprisonment. (Duke University, May 1993)
e InMARYLAND, arecent study found that it costs:
0 $1.1 million to prosecute a capital eligible case in which the death penalty is not
sought.
0 $1.8 million to prosecute a capital-eligible case in which prosecutors unsuccessfully
sought the death penalty
0 $3 million to prosecute a capital-eligible case resulting in the death penalty (Urban
Institute, The Cost of the Death Penalty in Maryland, March 2008)
¢ InCALIFORNIA the current system costs $137 million per year; it would cost $11.5 million

for a system without the death penalty. (California Commission for the Fair Administration of Justice, July
2008)

¢ InKANSAS, the costs of capital cases are 70% more expensive than comparable non-capital
cases, including the costs of incarceration. (Kansas Performance Audit Report, December 2003)

¢ InFLORIDA $51 million per year is spent above what it would cost to punish all 1*-degree
murderers with life without parole. (Palm Beach Post, January 2000)

Why does the death penalty cost more?
(Urban Institute, The Cost of the Death Penalty in Maryland, March 2008)
e The Maryland study determined that 70% of the added cost occurs during the trial phase
because of the complexity of trial and required resources, including:

o Additional time and complexity to determine eligibility of jurors - all must be
willing to impose the death penalty.

0 The guilt/innocence phase of a capital trial generally requires longer trials, more
expert witnesses, more defense attomeys, more prosecutors assigned to the case, and
more motions and hearings.

0 Ifaguilty verdict is issued, death notice cases have a second phase of trial to
determine sentencing - there is no comparable phase in non-death cases.

o Significant resources and a multi-disciplinary team of professionals conduct an
exhaustive life history investigation to prepare mitigating factors for the penalty phase.

e Itis more expensive to house a Death Row Inmate than an inmate serving a life sentence.
e The average number of appeals for capital-eligible cases that result in the death penalty are
greater than those were a death notice was not issued or unsuccessfully sought.

P.O. Box 4804, Charlottesville, VA 22905 « Toll Free: (888) 567-8237 * Fax: (434) 984-2803 * office@vadp.org * www.VADP.org

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
December 22, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.