Op-Ed "The Nation’s Racism & Virginia’s Death Penalty" by Kristina Leslie and Vivian Hernandez, Draft with MES and Paul Edits, 2020 June 20

Online content

Fullscreen
Racial Bigotry and the Death Penalty Are Inseparable
Death Penalty Repeal Essential to Racial Healing
Modern Day Lynching, the Death Penalty Must Be Repealed
The Nation’s Racism and Virginia’s Death Penalty

By Kristina Leslie and Vivian Hernandez

To watch a police officer crush the life out of George Floyd’s body, while
other officers stood by complicit, is a chilling reminder that the racial terror
of Black Americans never ends. The recent murders of Breonna Taylor,
Ahmaud Arbery, Rayshard Brooks, and too many others are disturbingly
similar to the thousands of documented lynchings that occurred in the
United States, from the Reconstruction Era through the Second World War.

For generations, this country’s failure to effectively combat, or even
confront, systemic racism has resulted in the brutal, discriminatory
treatment of Black and Brown people. Nowhere is racial bigotry more
insidious than in the application of America’s harshest punishment, death.

Bryan Stevenson’s scholarship with the Equal Justice Initiative shows that
capital punishment is directly related to lynching. {

Southern states with the highest lynching rates now lead the nation in the
number of executions. Shamefully, Virginia is number one on that list,
executing more people in its 400-year history than any other state.

Scholars and lawyers - including the US Department of Justice - have
examined the role of race in capital punishment. These studies reaffirm
what many minority communities already know - racial bias is inextricably
tied to the death penalty. While Black Americans comprise about 13 percent
of the U.S. population, they account for 42 percent of America’s death row.

But it is the victim’s race that often determines sentencing outcomes.
According to the Death Penalty Information Center,

. In Virginia, of the 1,390 documented executions

carried out since 1608, only four involved a White defendant killing a Black
victim - all since 1997. This data suggests that Black lives were
undervalued.

Virginia’s death penalty history is littered with horrific abuses and flagrant
misconduct. One egregious case occurred in 1949 when seven young Black
men were charged in Martinsville with the rape of a White woman. All seven
men - several falsely threatened into confessing with non-existent lynch
mobs - were convicted of rape and aiding and abetting rape by white juries,
then assembly-line electrocuted on two separate days.

In stark contrast, at the same time as the Martinsville cases, the Norfolk
Journal reported that a White Virginia man named Murrel Dudley was
convicted of raping a “feeble-minded colored woman.” He was fined $20.

Seventy years later, racial considerations still permeate our courtrooms and
improperly affect who lives and who dies. Black and Brown people are more
likely to be prosecuted for capital murder, sentenced to death, and
ultimately executed, especially if the victim is White. Capital defendants in
the Commonwealth are restrained by waist chains and leg irons while
seated in a courtroom adorned with portraits commemorating men of the
Confederacy. Typically, the judge, prosecutors and defense attorneys are all
White. As lawyers of color, we are profoundly aware that we and our clients
are the only minorities in the room.

No matter how well meaning and intentioned, race and the death penalty
are two inseparable sides of the same coin.

There have been
no executions in Virginia since 2017 and nearly a decade since a Virginia
jury handed down a death sentence - which was overturned by the Fourth
Circuit in 2018. That same year, a Prince William County jury rejected a
death sentence for a Black soldier who killed a White police officer.
Virginians have turned away from the death penalty in the courtroom.

It is now time for the General Assembly to follow suit. All killings,
particularly those carried out by the state in a biased manner, dilute the
morality of society as a whole. Meaningful and equitable criminal justice
reform, born in the wake of the recent police murders of Black Americans
and subsequent protests, must include abolishing the death penalty.

Governor Northam has promised to sign a death penalty repeal bill. Virginia
legislators, supported by Virginians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty,
will introduce an abolition bill in the 2021 General Assembly. Virginia has
the opportunity to be the first Southern state to abolish capital punishment
to correct the wrongs of the past and advance towards a more just,
equitable, and unbiased tomorrow.

Kristina Leslie is an Assistant Federal Public Defender and Vivian
Hernandez is a Capital Defense Lawyer. Both formerly served in the
Capital Defender Office in Northern Virginia, which represents those
charged with capital murder at the trial level. Ms. Leslie is the President of
Virginians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty. The views expressed do not
reflect the views of the Department of Defense, the United States
Government, or any agency or instrumentality thereof.

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Image for license or rights statement.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Date Uploaded:
December 20, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.