Bacon's Rebellion Op-Ed "Stop Executing the Severely Mentally Ill", 2018 January 3

Online content

Fullscreen
1/3/2018 Stop Executing the Severely Mentally Ill - Bacon's Rebellion
Stop Executing the Severely Mentally Ill
Posted on January 3, 2018 by James A. Bacon | 2 Comments

by Dale M. Brumfield

While Governor Terry McAuliffe’s commutation of the death penalty to life in
prison for the mentally ill William Burns was welcome, the fact that the governor
in July also allowed the execution of the equally mentally deficient William
Morva shows the need for a fair and consistent law.

Diagnosed with delusional disorder, William Morva committed his crimes while
under the delusional paranoia of his mental illness, including the belief that
President George W. Bush was conspiring with local law enforcement officers to
have him killed. Despite this, the jurors who sentenced Morva to death were told
during the trial only that he had “odd beliefs” about the world.

Dale Brumfield

His execution raises a basic bipartisan request: It is time that Virginia lawmakers
pass a severe mental illness exemption to the death penalty.

These illnesses, such as schizophrenia and the disorder that afflicted Morva, are characterized by hallucinations
and delusions which make it difficult to distinguish between reality and fiction. These characteristics make people
with psychiatric disabilities often unable to control or understand the consequences of their behavior. People
with severe mental illnesses experience these symptoms, not out of voluntary choice, but as a consequence of
their diagnosable medical condition.

These involuntary conditions disproportionately affect the most vulnerable people in our society. Low-income
Virginians are less likely to have stable access to mental health services, and subsequently suffer from higher
rates of untreated mental illness. Veterans are similarly affected, as the RAND Corporation has found that a
staggering 20% of veterans suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder or major depression.

The United States Supreme Court has already recognized that the death penalty should be reserved only for the
“worst of the worst.” Indeed, it ruled against the practice of executing juveniles and individuals with intellectual
disabilites, finding that their impairments reduce their moral culpability. Similarly, and due to their unique
conditions, people with mental illnesses also have reduced moral responsibility for their actions. Human decency
should make it obvious that defendants with severe mental illnesses should not be considered the “worst of the
worst” in our society.

It is obvious that Virginia’s existing legal safeguards aren’t enough to protect this vulnerable population and are
too prone to the whims of a prosecutor, a jury or the Governor. Mental illness is often seen by prosecutors and
juries as something that heightens, rather than lessens, the accused’s level of guilt and responsibility. Studies
have even indicated that jurors sometimes see mental illness as a reason to vote for, rather than against, death.
Correcting this backwardness of our admittedly outdated death penalty system is critical.

To be clear, this proposed legislation would not have enabled William Morva, William Burns or anyone with
similar conditions, to “fake” mental illness to avoid punishment. It is strictly defined to exempt onlyindividuals
diagnosed with the most serious and consequential disorders. Under this law, Morva, Burns and defendants like
them would still face a maximum sentence of life without the possibility of parole. This exemption still does
justice to victims and their family members, while respecting community demands of decency and the
Constitution.

“[Burns] will not evade punishment,” McAuliffe said in a statement, “he will be incarcerated for the remainder of
his life ... in my view this is the only just and reasonable course.”

According to Public Policy Polling, over half of Americans oppose the execution of people with severe mental
illness. It is hoped that in the upcoming 2018 General Assembly session our lawmakers recognize this consensus
in the law. Decency and justice demand that we fairly and consistently spare those with severe mental illness
from the ultimate punishment.


1/3/2018 Stop Executing the Severely Mentally Ill - Bacon's Rebellion

Dale Brumfield is Field Director for Virginians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty (VADP) and the author of
“Virginia State Penitentiary: A Notorious History” (Arcadia, 2017).


Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
December 19, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.