Senate Bill 1393 Free Lance-Star Editoral "Shrouding executions in secrecy isn't the answer", 2015 February 24

Online content

Fullscreen
Editorial: Shrouding executions in secrecy isn't the answer - Fredericksburg.com: Editorials Page | of 3

‘AboutUs Contact Us Subscribe e-Edition Fredericksburg Spotsylvania Stafford

HYUNDAL 249 Age

@ wvunoat
PRESIDENTS’

Welcome! Losin | Signup

DISCOVER MORE

‘Search this site a

News Obits Sports Business Features Entertainment Opinion Classifieds RealEstate Cars Jobs Deals Business Directory

Fredericksburg

Home Opinion Editorials

Editorial: Shrouding executions in secrecy
isn't the answer

Story Comments Print Font Size
Recommend Tweet) ‘t] [-1)/0] 1

Posted: Wednesday, February 25,2015 12:00 am

BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OF THEFREELANCE-STAR)  Ocomments

Few mong the states than capital punishment
Texas, with a virtu i ichigan, which

aballzhed the death penalty in 1846, nine ate after became sit The ob atti het apnlies

the number of
Virginia is a part has only ei yw and has executed

onl five inmates inthe past five years ‘and hog Finer at anette eho support capital
is believed to be higher in Virginia, though

there isan absence of recent pol information.

Inany eu until Tuesday, when the House of Delegates defeated the measure, the General
lation that Senate Bill
1393, introduced by Sen. Richard Saslaw, a Sprngtiela Democrat, would protect the identity of the

i WHITE SUPPLY & GLASS CO.
—;

Trust the: the Clear Ch

experts!
for Dependable Service Since 1948!
nx

produce in the state's lethal injection “cocktail.” It woul that
the make 1 \ the drugs used “are

confidential, exempt from the Freedom of Information Act, and not subject to Asbovery or
introduction, acivil

‘The purpose of the legislation was to free the lethal drug pipeline from the hassles of public
¥, the event

The bill d by
in the House. Even Gov. Terry mcaulife cxpressed support for the measure.

‘That House members saw the light on this is a good thing because when the government looks to
shroud a government function in secrecy, as it did here, red flags go up, as they shoul

Akey reason US. executions has dropped in recent years lethal
injection drugs have dried up. They Europe
death upon and them

consumer backlash at home.

Oklahoma, which unseated Virginia as the No. 2 eee se last year, is among the states that

have sought went terribly
wrong, with the condemned iamateconvulsing Sunny ajrosoab that lowed d9stes unto
finally di

The US. Supt is on the US. and
unusual punishment, h ph

moratorium, Erie
Holder said last week that a national moratorium would be prudent until the Supreme Court issues
its findings.

“Pala” athe tenon abana th
guilt tose waa Weald otherwise ‘oppose it. Botched executions would counter that, and the
Tegisloion would protect the pompantes tat proted the feulty arugs bom bad publicity

than this. L way to address
an issue that merits straightforward debate.

More about Death Penalty

‘+ ARTICLE: Marathon bombing defense likely to focus on dead brother

http://www. fredericksburg.com/opinion/editorials/editorial-shrouding-executions-in-secrec.

COMMERCIAL
HOME BUILDERS

We Won't Leave You Qut in the Cold!

CONSTRUCTION _ 98 /2was

LOANS 3.95%

with rates
INTEREST ONLY
BAMENTERS DA
GAS

months

Liv %
up to
of onpraised value
Peoples
Community thon
Battle ewe THRE

“MENS

Sharon Shade

2/25/2015

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
December 29, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.