Proponent Testimony of Christy Sheppard for Senate Bill 162, 2015 October 21

Online content

Fullscreen
Proponent Testimony of Christy Sheppard
Senate Bill 162
October 21, 2015

Good morning Chairman Eklund, Vice Chairman Obhof, Ranking Member Thomas and members of the
committee. My name is Christy Sheppard. | grew up ina small town called Ada, Oklahoma. Ada is a small
town about the same size as Streetsboro, Ashland or Portsmouth, Ohio.

Ada is where my cousin, Debbie Carter, was brutally raped and murdered. | offer you testimony today
from the perspective of a victims’ family member whose accused killer had a history of serious mental
illness.

Debbie was just 21 years old. She was beautiful, funny, quick-witted, and living on her own for the first
time in her life. She had everything to look forward to in life, but on December 8, 1982, she was brutally
raped and murdered. The killer or killers left behind a horrifying scene. Five years after her murder in
the summer of 1987, two men went on trial, Dennis Fritz and Ron Williamson.

Ron Williamson was a local who had a promising career as a major league baseball player and had made
it all way to playing a brief period with the Yankees. But soon his mental illness and self medicating lead
Ron back home to Oklahoma and living with his mother. Ron had a long well-documented history of
serious mental illness and had began to have some issues with the law.

Mr. Williamson lived a block from Debbie and | lived a block in the other direction. He had become the
local “crazy,” talking to himself in the streets and singing in convenience store parking lots. So the
pieces started to fit together that he had to be involved with Debbie’s murder.

While on trial Ron Williamson screamed at the jury, flipped over the defense table and was about as
unruly and unsympathetic a man could be. Ron was so disruptive, he had to be removed from the court
room and his trial proceeded without him.

Mr. Williamson was sentenced to death and spent the next 12 years on the row. Then in 1997 Ron was
granted a new trial, but the first step was a competency hearing. | attended the hearing and this was
the first time my professional and personal life would conflict. | am a mental health professional, | sat in
the court room and watched this man who | had grown up fearing and hating, not be able to distinguish
between reality and the voices that haunted him. | left the court room feeling so conflicted and sad. |
then delivered to my aunt the news that there was no way this man could aid in his own defense.

Ron would never return to death row and some months later was exonerated by DNA evidence. A few
years later my family would learn what all Ron had endured while on death row. His hair turned snow
white and he pulled out his own teeth, he heard voices through his TV and would scream and yell for
them to stop. He lost all touch with reality. Ron struggled everyday with medication compliance,
finances, housing, and drinking after he was exonerated and developed cirrhosis of the live. He died at
the age of 51 in a nursing home.

In our case the burden of guilt and shame will never go away. For feeling like we played a part in the
wrongful conviction of an innocent man; for projecting all the tragedy of Debbie’s murder on him; for
taking him away from his family; for him spending twelve years on death row and completely going
insane, for a crime he did not commit.

My family’s experience with the murder of my cousin, the death penalty case against the man we all
thought committed the crime, and his serious mental illness which compounded the tragedy, gives us a
unique perspective. | strongly support Senate Bill 162 and am happy to answer any questions.

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Image for license or rights statement.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Date Uploaded:
January 3, 2026

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.