Death Penalty Fact Sheet, 2016 January 15

Online content

Fullscreen
Ce: Virginia’s Death Penalty

VIRGINIANS FOR What are the facts?

ALTERNATIVES

TO THE DEATH PENALTY

A study of leading criminologists published in June 2009

in Northwestern University School of Law’s Journal of Reducing Drug Abuse
Criminal Law and Criminology found: Better Economy, Jobs ™

oo. . . Simplifying Court Rules [== 16%
* 88% of the country’s top criminologists do not believe the ager : : 15%

death penalty acts as a deterrent to homicide. More Police Officers 10%
a ‘ . Reducing Guns ‘
* 87% percent of the expert criminologists believe that ne A
Expand Death Penalty = =

Innocent People May Die

“ ~Since 1973, 155 people on death row have been exonerated while 1,422 have been executed.
That is one death row exoneration for every nine executions!

*¢ Just days before Earl Washington Jr. was to be executed, Virginia allowed DNA evidence to be
examined which proved his innocence. However, the vast majority of capital cases have no
biological evidence to test.

It Does Not Deter Crime

death penalty abolition would not have any significant

O% 5% 10%

. . 20% 25% 30% 35%
effect on murder rates. Percent Naming Item As Primary Focus
75% of the respondents agree that “debates about the A 1995 Hart Research Poll of police chiefs in
death penalty distract Congress and state legislatures from the US put the death penalty last (at 1%) in

focusing on real solutions to crime problems.” identifying items that reduce violent crime.

The Death Penalty Is Too Expensive

No cost study has yet been done in VIRGINIA. Those that have studied the cost found irrefutable data that
the death penalty costs taxpayers more than life imprisonment:

In CALIFORNIA the current system costs $137 million per year, it would cost $11.5 million for a sys-
tem without the death penalty. (California Ci ssion for the Fair Adi ation of Justice, July 2008)

In KANSAS, the costs of capital cases are 70% more expensive than comparable non-capital cases, in-
cluding the costs of incarceration. (Kansas Performance Audit Report, December 2003)

NORTH CAROLINA taxpayers spend $2.16 million per execution over the costs of sentencing murder-
ers to life imprisonment. (Duke University, May 1993)

In FLORIDA $51 million per year is spent above what it would cost to punish all 1“-degree murderers
with life without parole. (Palm Beach Post, January 2000)

In MARYLAND death penalty cases cost 3 times more than non-death penalty cases, or $3 million for a
single case. (Urban Institute, The Cost of the Death Penalty in Maryland, March 2008)

* The greatest costs associated with the death penalty occur prior to and during trial, not in post-
conviction proceedings. Even if all post-conviction proceedings (appeals) were abolished, the death
penalty would still be more expensive than alternative sentences.

Race Plays A Role

Researchers in Virginia found that a person is over three times as likely to be sentenced to death
when the victim is white vs. when the victim is black (Virginia Joint Legislative Audit and
Review Cc ission of Capital Punish ). Among persons executed for interracial murders in
the US, there were 15 executions with a white defendant & a black victim and 228 executions
with a black defendant & white victim (Death Penalty Information Center).

Race of Defendants Executed Race of Victim in Death Penalty Cases

Hispanic About 80% of the
% — murder victims in

@ Black - 383 aaa
cases resulting in an

5%
Zz
Hispanic 79 Za execution were white,
O White - 633 even though nationally
8 ine 4 SN only 50% of murder

‘Other Victims generally are
2% white.

Geography Determines Execution Rates

Since 1977, about 90% of all US executions have been carried out in the south. With ///
persons executed since 1982, Virginia is third behind Texas and Oklahoma in the number of
people executed. In Virginia, murder convictions ending in the death penalty are twice as
likely in suburban and rural jurisdictions as in urban jurisdictions.

Public Opinion Favors The Alternative

Support for Alternatives to the Death Penalty
Life with
9

No opinion
6%

Death penalty
33%

* A 2010 poll by Lake Research Partners found that
a clear majority of voters (61%) would choose a
punishment other than the death penalty for
murder.

Virginians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty * P.O. Box 12222 * Richmond, VA 23241

(434) 960-7779 * office@VADP.org * www.vadp.org


Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
December 19, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.