Richmond Times-Dispatch Article "There are only 4 inmates on death row in Virginia, down from at least 57 in 1995", 2017 September 1, 2017 September 5

Online content

Fullscreen
9/5/2017 There are only 4 inmates on death row in Virginia, down from at least 57 in 1995 | Crime | richmond.com

P: richmond. r rh rc death: i ticle_fc4e6acd-2659-Sdf1-af34-1aa401fd2916.html

There are only 4 inmates on death row in Virginia, down from at least 57 in 1995

BY FRANK GREEN Richmond Times-Dispatch Sep 1, 2017

Morva

i

Ricky Javon Gray

was sentenced to death for the 2006
killings of two young Richmond
sisters. The girls were arnong seven
people Gray killed.

Half of Virginia's death row inmates will have their cases argued before the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals this month, but that should not
tax the Richmond-based court - there are only two of them.

Virginia's death row population peaked in 1995 at 57 or 58 inmates. Today there are just four, the fewest since July 1979, not long after
Virginia law was changed enabling resumption of the death penalty after it was halted across the country by a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court
ruling.

Now, after 113 executions, a handful of commutations, court actions, deaths while awaiting execution, a steep drop in homicides, the advent
of true life sentences and other factors, Virginia's death row is the smallest it has been in almost four decades.

Since the U.S. Supreme Court allowed capital punishment to resume in 1976 under re-written state laws, only Texas, with 543, has carried
out more executions than Virginia. Of 31 states with a death penalty, as of April, only six had smaller death rows. California has the country's
largest, with 744 inmates.

While executions continue to be carried out in Virginia - there were two this year, Ricky Gray and William Morva - there have been no new
faces on Virginia's death row in more than five years.

http:/Avww. richmond i Iy-inmates-on-death-row-in-virgini icle_fedeGacd-2659-5df1 -af34-1aa4011d296....

13,

9/5/2017 There are only 4 inmates on death row in Virginia, down from at least 57 in 1995 | Crime | richmond.com
Thomas A. Porter, 41, and Anthony Juniper, 45, both sentenced to death in Norfolk, are set to argue their appeals on Sept. 12 and 15th
respectively. Also on death row are Mark Lawlor, 52, sentenced to death in Fairfax County, and William Burns, 51, sentenced to death in
Shenandoah County, but held to be incompetent since 2011.

State Del. Robert B. Bell, R-Albemarle, the chairman of the Virginia State Crime Commission, said another reason there are fewer death
sentences today is because they have become more difficult to obtain.

"The groups opposed to the death penalty have made it such an arduous endeavor for prosecutors . . from a resource perspective, to give a
case all the time and energy that it would require to see through to a successful capital case prosecution," said Bell

Bell said in many smaller localities, "You have prosecutors’ offices that have three of four people and. . . you'd have to pull off of everything
else that happens." He said, "I think that's part of the scenario, it's part of what drives it."

Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death penalty Information Center and a critic of the way the death penalty has been carried out,
agrees it is now more difficult to win a death sentence in Virginia but for good reason. Among other things, he said, Virginia now has
regional capital defenders, "which means defendants get much better representation than they used to get at trial. That has made a big
difference.”

And Virginia juries are now told that a life sentence means life without parole, something that had not been done before September, 1999.
That has also had an effect, he said. People convicted of capital murder in Virginia can be sentenced to death or life in prison.

Also, said Dunham, "Murder rates are near historic lows, so you don’t have the level of fear and political pandering on crime that you had in
1980s and 1990s.”

Dunham said public support for the death penalty has dropped. A national Gallup poll last year found that while 60 percent of respondents
said they support the death penalty and 37 percent said the opposed it, the support level was the lowest since the U.S. Supreme Court
struck down the death penalty in November 1972.

While no new death sentence has been imposed in Virginia for the last five years, in the preceding five years, from 2007 to 2011, six death
sentences were imposed; from 2002 to 2006, 14 death sentences; and from 1997 to 2001, 32 death sentences, he said

Dunham contends, "There has been a complete sea change in attitudes and practices during that time.”

He said legislators and prosecutors are more committed to upholding existing death sentences and carrying out executions of those already
sentenced to death than they are to committing decades of new resources to obtaining and carrying out new death sentences.

"When you add a dwindling death row to the equation, you begin to have a political environment in which abolition of capital punishment
no longer seems like a farfetched notion," said Dunham.

The Virginia Department of Corrections could not confirm that the state's death row population peaked at 58 in 1995, as has been reported
by the Richmond Times-Dispatch. The NAACP's Legal Defense Fund, which had figures at certain points each year back to 1981, says Virginia
had 57 on death row as of Oct. 31, 1995, the highest number it recorded in Virginia at any one time.

The Department of Corrections said the last time Virginia had four inmates on death row was in early July 1979. A fifth was added shortly
after.

fgreen@timesdispatch.com
(804) 649-6340

MORE INFORMATION

http: richmond i p x death. J » fcdeBacd-2659-Sdf1-af34-1aa401fd2916.... 2/3

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
December 29, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.