The Washington Post Op-Ed "Virginia is on the verge of abolishing the death penalty. Other states should follow suit", 2021 January 27

Online content

Fullscreen
1/27/2021 Opinion | Virginia is on the verge of abolishing the death penalty. Other states should follow suit. - The Washington Post

Opinion: Virginia is on the verge of
abolishing the death penalty. Other
states should follow suit.

Opinion by Editorial Board
Jan. 27, 2021 at 3:47 p.m. EST
THE COMMONWEALTH of Virginia has carried out more executions than any other state. Now, a bill to end capital

punishment in Virginia is making its way through the state legislature and toward the governor’s desk.

The prospects for passage are good: While the measure is being championed by Democrats, who hold slim majorities
in both chambers of the state legislature, it has attracted bipartisan support. Should a parallel measure pass the
House, Gov. Ralph Northam (D) will sign the legislation into law, making Virginia the 23rd state to abolish the death

penalty. (The governors of California, Oregon and Pennsylvania have imposed moratoriums on executions.)

Virginia would also become the first Southern state to abolish the death penalty. This is a momentous reversal: The
state has outpaced almost every other in putting its citizens to death in the modern era. Since 1976, when the
Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty, Virginia has executed 113 people — behind only Texas, a far outlier at

570 executions.

The potential for death-penalty abolition in Virginia is particularly welcome news following the spate of federal
executions carried out in recent months. After a 17-year pause in federal executions, the Trump administration raced
to kill several people on death row in its final days — an extremely rare occurrence during the transition of power. As
Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted in a forceful dissent on a decision that allowed the final execution to go forward, the
Trump administration executed more than three times as many people in its final six months as the federal

government had executed in the previous six decades.

Corey Johnson and Dustin Higgs, the final two people put to death by the Trump administration, had both
contracted covid-19 while on death row. Their lawyers argued that during their executions, lung damage from their

illnesses would cause their lungs to rupture quickly, fill with fluids and create a sensation of drowning to death.

The death penalty is a cruelty unworthy of this nation even when the condemned don’t experience unimaginable
suffering in their final moments. The practice is expensive, error-ridden and plagued by racial bias. Those sentenced
to die are disproportionately Black and poor. And, since 1973, more than 170 people have been exonerated

and released from death row. Worryingly, defendants commonly land there in large part due to inadequate legal
representation, a function of poverty. An irreversible punishment that is disproportionately handed down to Black,

intellectually disabled and poor Americans cannot pass for justice.

The momentum in Virginia to turn away from state-sponsored killing is heartening, especially considering that a
more limited measure to ban executions for those with severe mental illness failed to pass just last year. The tides
appear to be changing quickly, no doubt in part due to the racial justice protests that followed George Floyd’s death.
Other states should follow Virginia in leaving behind the gruesome practice. If Virginia can shift so quickly in

renouncing an unworthy tradition, let us hope it can happen anywhere.

https:/ g the-verge-of-abolishing-the-death-penalty-other-states-should-foll it/2021/01/27/528b726.

4

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
December 30, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.