The Case for Death Penalty Abolition in Virginia, 2020 June 11

Online content

Fullscreen
The Case for Death Penalty Abolition

in Virginia

1, No one has been sentenced to death in Virginia since 2011, over nine years ago. And the U.S. Fourth
Circuit Court overturned that death sentence.
2. In most of Virginia, the death penalty is simply no longer used. Of the 133 local political jurisdictions
in the Commonwealth:
¢ 18 localities have never had an execution (13%)
¢ 33 jurisdictions have not had an execution in over 100 years (25%)
+ 69 localities have not had an execution in over 50 years (52%)
Since 1976, just three jurisdictions (Chesterfield, Prince William, & Virginia Beach) have had 23%
of Virginia’s executions. Six jurisdictions (Chesterfield, Fairfax, Hampton, Pittsylvania, Portsmouth,
Prince William, & Virginia Beach) account for 41% of the executions.

Number of Executions
1976-2018

3. In 2012 the National Research Council concluded Gases rat ent en Non ean
that there is no credible evidence the death penal- ot ases ases
ty deters homicide. In fact, states without the Defense $395,762 $98,963
death penalty consistently have significantly Trial Court $ 72,530 $21,554
lower murder rates than death penalty states. ia 40.13 days 16.79 days
4. While there has been no detailed cost analysis of Prison $49,380/year $24,690/year
Virginia’s death penalty, studies in other states Cases that did
consistently demonstrate that the death penal- not go to trial
ty costs significantly more than life in prison Detense $130,595 $64,711
without parole. To the right are details from a
Trial Court $ 16,263 $ 7,384

Kansas study that illustrate the gap in costs.
SOURCE: "Report of the Judicial Council Death Penalty
Advisory Committee," Judicial Council,
Kansas Legislature, February 13, 2014

5. The punishment of life in prison without parole protects the public from dangerous criminals at a signifi-
cantly lower cost. The cost savings from abolishing the death penalty could be used instead to investi-
gate unsolved cold cases or provide more fi ial and g assi to victims of violent
crimes.

6. Public opinion polls have shown a consistent decrease in support for the death penalty over the past thirteen
years. Opposition to the death penalty is now the highest that it has been since 1972.

A 2010 poll by Lake Research Partners found that a clear majority of voters (61%) would choose a punish-
ment other than the death penalty for murder. When presented with alternatives to the death penalty, similar
polls consistently show much less public support for the death penalty.

DEatn penalty,

No opinion
6%.

ife without parole plus restitution)

7.One man sentenced to death in Virginia, Earl Washington, was proven innocent by DNA testing. Others
have been executed with serious doubts about their guilt. There is no way to correct a wrongful convic-
tion if an innocent person is executed.

8. Human beings make mistakes — police, prosecutors, judges, jurors, and defense attorneys. Innocent people
should not die when mistakes are made in the criminal justice system.

9. There are only two men on Virginia’ death row, and both death sentences are under review by federal
courts. These sentences may well be reversed for the following reasons:

¢ In one case, evidence showing the defendant did not commit the crime was withheld.

¢ In the other case, a jury member committed perjury during the jury selection process.

It is time to abolish the death penalty in Virginia.

Virginians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty
P.O. Box 12222 @ Richmond, VA 23241
(434) 960-7779
www.vadp.org

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Image for license or rights statement.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Date Uploaded:
December 20, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.