Death Penalty Strategic Plan, Draft with Table, 2015 July 7

Online content

Fullscreen
DRAFT Death Penalty Strategic Plan
July 7, 2015

Substantive Goal:
¢ Move Virginia to de facto abolition, as measured by:

o No executions in the last 10 years (Virginia has carried out 16 in that
time)

o No more than 15 new death sentences in the last 10 years (Virginia
has issued 7 death sentences)

o Fewer than 15 people on death row (Virginia has 8 on death row
now).

Organizational Goal:
¢ Develop strong coordination and communication between all death penalty
advocates in the Commonwealth, including litigators, lobbyists,
communications folks, organizers, etc. to ensure non-litigation advocacy
moves forward in a way that follows the national strategy to abolish the
death penalty and does not undermine the work of litigators in the courts.

Coalition Members
e VADP
VA Catholic Conference
ACLU of Virginia
Amnesty USA
8” Amendment Project
ABA Death Penalty Due Process Review Project
Rob Lee (Virginia Capital Representation Resource Center)

Substantive Objectives (by conclusion of 2017 legislative session):

¢ Pretrial determination of intellectual disability
Pass legislation that requires the trial court to make a pretrial
determination of whether a capital defendant is intellectually disabled, and
thus ineligible for the death penalty (this would not preclude the defendant
to also raise the issue of intellectual disability during the sentencing phase
in the event the defendant does not prevail during the pretrial
determination).

e Prohibit execution of individuals with severe mental illness
Pass legislation that prohibits the application of the death penalty for
anyone who, at the time of the offense, suffered from significant limitations
in both their general intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior,
whether resulting from intellectual disability, dementia, traumatic brain
injury, or other disease or disability.

Proposed Messaging:
1. To be developed with ABA Death Penalty Due Process Review Project and
8 Amendment Project

Proposed Targets:
1. Del. Cline
2. Del. Loupassi
3. Del. Habeeb
4. Del. Rob Bell

Proposed Timeline and Tasks:

5. Sen. Obenshain
6. Sen. Saslaw
7. Sen. Norment

sources to fill gaps

¢ Draft advocacy tool-kit items
Fact sheets
Sample LTE and op ed
Messaging documents

In coordination with litigators, finalize substantive DONE
objectives

¢ Identify ideal messengers (i.e. mental In process
illness/intellectual disability advocates)

¢ Identify legislative patrons In process

« Identify resource gaps and potential funding Michael

Frank
(will circulate to Virginia)

¢ Develop messaging

In collaboration with the
SMI Exemption Initiative

¢ Determine capacity/interests of ABA Death
Penalty Due Process Assessment Team and
incorporate into campaign plan

Frank - Misty Thomas

¢ Finalize targets

Team

¢ Create intelligence database for each target

¢ Finalize tool kit

Ryan

Frank

¢ Finalize intelligence database

Frank

¢ Identify unlikely allies/grasstops to sign op
eds/LTEs to place in target media markets:

Draft op eds/LTEs

Identify target media outlets

¢ Identify story ideas/media hooks for each month
of campaign:

Pitch story ideas/place stories in each target media
market


Task

Person Responsible

¢ Draft bill language

¢ Identify/recruit/train volunteer organizers in
target districts

September 2015

Draft op eds/LTEs

Identify target media outlets

¢ Identify unlikely allies/grasstops to sign op
eds/LTEs to place in target media markets:

Pitch story ideas/place stories in each target media
market

¢ Continue to identify/recruit/train volunteer
organizers in target districts

¢ Advocacy trainings (VADP and AI/USA)

Michael / Ryan

October 2015

¢ Place a story in one target media market

¢ Place op eds/LTEs in one media market

¢ Advocacy trainings (VADP and AI/USA)

Michael / Ryan

November 2015

¢ Place a story in one target media market

¢ Place op eds/LTEs in each target media market

¢ Collect stories from impacted individuals and
families/identify spokespeople/witnesses

¢ Advocacy trainings (VADP and AI/USA)

Michael / Ryan

¢ Secure patrons

December 2015

¢ Place a story in one target media market

¢ Place op eds/LTEs in each target media market


Task

Person Responsible

|

¢ Collect stories from impacted individuals and
families/identify spokespeople/witnesses

¢ Editorial board and key reporter meetings (ACLU-
VA)

January 2016

Hire public affairs firm with conservative
credentials and contacts for communications and
lobbying work

If funding received

Bipartisan press conference with amendment
patrons near the first day of session.

Place a story in one target media market

Place op eds/LTEs in one media market

February 2016

¢ Place a story in one target media market

¢ Place op eds/LTEs in one media market

¢ Phone bank action targeting committee and floor
votes

March 2016

¢ Assess results of efforts and lessons for 2017
session

¢ Reassess target list

¢ Update toolkit materials

¢ TBD


Task

Person Responsible

April 2016

¢ TBD

May 2016

¢ TBD

June 2016

¢ TBD

July 2016

¢ TBD

August 2016

¢ TBD

September 2016

¢ TBD

October 2016

¢ TBD

November 2016

¢ TBD

December 2016

¢ TBD

January 2017

¢ TBD

February 2017

¢ TBD

March 2017

¢ TBD

April 2017

¢ TBD

May 2017

¢ TBD


Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
December 19, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.