Senate Bill 1393 Virginia Pilot Online Editorial "Don't let execution enter shadows", 2015 February 14

Online content

Fullscreen
Don't let execution enter shadows | HamptonRoads.com | PilotOnline.com Page 1 of 2

PilotOnlinecom

Don't let execution enter shadows
The Virginian-Pilot
© February 14, 2015

Virginia lawmakers are coalescing in bipartisan fashion around a terrible idea.
That's not necessarily new, but the consequence of the plan embodied in SB1393
effectively seals critical information about the government's use of lethal injection
on behalf of Virginians.

It's wrong, and the twisted rationale offered by defenders, including the bill's patron,
Democratic Sen. Dick Saslaw, underscores its moral bankruptcy.

The use of lethal injection has grown complicated in recent years, as overseas
manufacturers have refused to sell their drugs for use in executions. That's led
states to use cocktails that have had barbaric effects: inmates wheezing and
writhing, in some cases for more than an hour, before finally succumbing.

Those prolonged deaths might be perfectly acceptable in places like Saudi Arabia
or China, but they appear to conflict mightily with the U.S. Constitution's Eighth
Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.

Sealing details about the compounding of drugs used for execution could prevent
that issue from being fully explored, as state Sen. John Edwards, an attorney,
argued to his colleagues. In other words, the bill's purpose runs counter to
fundamental principles of an open and civilized society.

Sadly, the proposal's chief supporters sidestep the point. "Ultimately," Saslaw said,
“if we don't solve this problem, we're going to go back to the electric chair."

But the chair is its own form of brutality, a method that has yielded lengthy,
gruesome executions, too. That's why it was largely abandoned in favor of the
quieter deaths wrought by a drug no longer available.

The death penalty is declining in the U.S., and the recent controversies threaten to
end the practice. Last year, 35 people were executed in the U.S., the fewest since
1994.

More importantly, however, seven death row inmates were exonerated and
released. This point, inconvenient to death-penalty supporters, highlights concerns
that perhaps government, which sometimes struggles even to build a website or
negotiate decent contracts, also occasionally fails to obtain justice. It sometimes
condemns the wrong person.

The last thing anyone - in Virginia or elsewhere in the U.S. - should want is for
government to be able to hide details that undercut principles embedded in the
nation's founding document.

This bill should be tabled indefinitely.
HIT Today's dollars

http://hamptonroads.com/2015/02/dont-let-execution-enter-shadows 2/14/2015

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Image for license or rights statement.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Date Uploaded:
December 29, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.