LA Times Op-Ed "Can Virginia reject past and ban the death penalty?", 2021 January 28

Online content

Fullscreen
1/28/2021 Can Virginia reject its racist past and ban the death penalty? - Los Angeles Times

Opinion: Can Virginia reject its racist past and ban the death penalty?

Workers remove a chair from the death chamber at San Quentin State Prison in March 2019 after California Gov. Gavin Newsom ordered a moratorium on executions. Virginia is working
on a bill that would do California one better and ban the practice altogether. (Associated Press)

By SCOTT MARTELLE EDITORIAL WRITER

JAN. 28, 2021 10:07 AM PT

f Wa

Since the earliest days of European settlement of North America, Virginia — first as a colony, then as a state — has executed
more people than any other jurisdiction in the United States. But in recent years it has moved away from capital punishment,

with only two people currently on its death row, no executions since two in 2017, and no new death sentences since 2011.

And now Virginia may be on the verge of banning the practice altogether, which would make it the first of the secessionist

Civil War states to formally end a practice inextricably tied to slavery and its legacy of racism. Here’s hoping it won’t be the

last.

Efforts have been made in Virginia before to end the death penalty, but they were unsuccessful in the traditionally
conservative state. But as demographics have changed in Virginia over recent years, Democrats won control of the state
Legislature in the November 2019 elections, joining Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam, who has made ending the death

penalty in Virginia a priority.

https://www.latime: i yi2021-01-28/virginia-death-penalt rtham-calif

1/3.

1/28/2021 Can Virginia reject its racist past and ban the death penalty? - Los Angeles Times

And it might happen this time. A key state Senate committee approved an abolition bill Tuesday, and local reports suggest the

proponents have enough support in the Legislature to enact the ban.

ADVERTISING.

OPINION

Opinion: The Trump era: Time flies when you’re not having fun

Jan. 20, 2021

According to an analysis by the Death Penalty Information Center, from 1608 through 2019 Virginia executed 1,390 people,
with 113 of those coming after 1976 when the Supreme Court reaffirmed capital punishment. The second-most prolific killer
of the condemned is Texas, with 1,322 executions over time. As the busiest of the handful of states that still execute people,

Texas could eventually surpass Virginia on that all-time list of shame.

And yes, it’s a bit odd that a freshly purple state like Virginia could be on the verge of such a historic step while California —

among the bluest of the blue states — has fallen short, most recently in 2016 when voters approved Proposition 66 to not

only retain the death penalty but to truncate the appeal process.

But Proposition 66 did not fully anticipate how to do that; it did not include funding for an expanded capital defense bar to

handle the increased caseload, for instance. Then, before any executions could take place, Gov. Gavin Newsom declared a

moratorium two years ago, abandoned the single-drug lethal injection protocol and dismantled the death chamber at San

Quentin.

Business Advisory: Experts Weigh in on 2021
Business Predictions...
By Objective Capital Partners

Channing Hamlet, Managing Director

https://www.latime: yi2021-01-28/virginia-death-penalt rtham-calif ons

1/28/2021 Can Virginia reject its racist past and ban the death penalty? - Los Angeles Times
A bill to once again put a death penalty ban before voters has been introduced in Sacramento, but so far no action has been

taken.

Advocates for capital punishment frame their arguments in terms of justice for victims and executions as deterrents for others

who might kill. But the flaws of the system itself overwhelm those points.

Ensuring that the innocent are not wrongly executed — and there is no guarantee — requires a slow and deliberate review
process that, given budgetary constraints and overloaded courts, takes years, and in some cases decades, to complete,

dragging out the agony of the families involved.

And given that only a handful of people are executed each year, there is little justice — no matter how one defines it —
delivered. What we get are randomized and arbitrary applications of the death penalty to people who are disproportionately
nonwhite, poor and often suffering from severe mental illness — not people placed on a list based on the heinousness of their

crimes, the supposed “worst of the worst.”

OPINION

" Opinion: Biden needs to decide what ‘unity’ means

Jan. 28, 2021

It’s the racist history of the death penalty that comes into focus with the decision now facing Virginia. The Death Penalty
Information Center issued a report last year, “Enduring Injustice: The Persistence of Racial Discrimination in the U.S. Death

Penalty,” detailing the history of capital punishment in the South from the slave era through the present day.

It includes jarring maps showing the overlap between concentrations of lynchings of Black victims between 1883 and 1940
and state executions of Black defendants from 1972 to 2020. There are many reasons to end the death penalty, but

the inherent racismbehind how we determine who will die for their crimes stands as the starkest.

https://www.latime: yi2021-01-28/virginia-death-penalt rtham-calif 318

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
December 29, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.