Murder Victim Family Member Press Conference Remarks, MES Draft, 2019 November 21

Online content

Fullscreen
Remarks for November 21, 2019
Murder Victim Family Members Press Conference

Good morning. My name is Michael Stone and I am Executive Director of Virginians for
Alternatives to the Death Penalty (VADP).

The first documented execution in what is now the United states took place in Jamestown
when Captain George Kendall was executed for spying in 1608. Throughout its history as
a colony and a state, Virginia has executed more than 1,300 people, the most of any other
state. Virginia has also executed more women and the youngest children of any state.

Since 1976, when the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the death penalty to resume after a
three-year hiatus, Virginia has executed 113 people, second only to Texas in the United
States.

In the 1990's six to ten people were sentenced to death annually. As many as fourteen
were put to death in a single year.

But times have changed. In the past thirteen years nine states have ended capital
punishment. Since 1973, 166 people sentenced to death in the United States were later
found to be innocent. In that same period of time 1,510 people have been executed.
That's a ratio of one innocent person sentenced to death for every nine executed.

Here in Virginia there is growing opposition to use of the death penalty. Nearly two-
thirds of the state's 133 local jurisdictions have not had an execution in over 50 years. No
one has been sentenced to death in the Commonwealth since September of 2011, over
eight years ago.

There are only two men on Virginia's death row, and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
has remanded both of their cases to lower courts to consider whether errors in their trials
should overturn their death sentences. It is entirely possible that Virginia’s death row
will be empty within a year.

There have been a growing chorus of voices here in the Commonwealth voicing their
opposition to capital punishment. Leaders in almost every faith tradition oppose capital
punishment. Young conservatives increasingly view the death penalty as a misguided
public policy by an over-reaching government that is unnecessary, expensive, arbitrary,
and degrading to human life and dignity.

Today we are here to highlight 13 courageous family members of murder victims in
Virginia. They have banded together and endorsed a sign-on letter calling on the General
Assembly to abolish the death penalty.

Many other victim family members oppose capital punishment, but were unwilling to
sign a public statement for a variety of personal reasons.

I now want to introduce Rachel Sutphin. Her father - Corporal Eric E. Sutphin with the
Montgomery County Sheriff's Office — was killed in Blacksburg during a manhunt for
William Morva on August 6, 2006. Ms. Sutphin pleaded with then-Governor Terry
McAuliffe to spare the life of Morva and reduce his sentence to life in prison without
parole. She never received a response to her plea and Morva was executed on July 6,
2017.

Rachel wants to share her experience and explain why she as the daughter of a murder
victim sees the death penalty as inefficient, ineffective, and traumatic for many murder
victim families.

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
December 19, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.