Richmond Times-Dispatch Digital Article Op-Ed by Keith Harward "Innocence reason enough to abolish the death penalty", 2019 December 21

Online content

Fullscreen
12/22/2019 Keith Harward column: Innocence reason enough to abolish the death penalty | Columnists | richmond.com

General Assembly should take action

Keith Harward column: Innocence reason enough to abolish the
death penalty

By Keith Harward Dec 21, 2019

BOB BROWN

Keith Harward spoke during an RTD Public Square shortly after his release
from prison in 2016. To Harward’s left is RTD reporter Frank Green, who
covered his exoneration.

ALEXA WELCH EDLUND/TIMES-DISPATCH

https://www.richmond. i ith-h ‘d-col

igh-to-abolish-th licle_27522f49-4864-57d2-b2a... 1/4

12/22/2019 Keith Harward column: Innocence reason enough to abolish the death penalty | Columnists | richmond.com
In the early hours of Sept. 14, 1982, a man broke into a home in Newport News and beat
30-year-old Jesse Perron to death with a crowbar. Then, over several hours, the attacker
sexually assaulted Perron’s 22-year-old wife, Teresa, leaving bite marks during the assault.
Before the attacker fled, he took $14 from Teresa’s purse.

Evidence pointed toward a sailor who served on the U.S.S. Carl Vinson that was harbored
nearby. At the time, I was one of 1,300 crew members on that ship.

Eight months later, after being discharged from the Navy, I became suspect No. 1 after an
assault upon my girlfriend in which I bit her.

On March 6, 1986, a jury in Newport News convicted me of murder, robbery, burglary and
rape. I was sentenced to life in prison.

The key evidence against me was a coerced witness identification and testimony by two
forensic experts who said that I was the only person who could have left the bite mark on
the rape victim.

In July 2015, the Innocence Project obtained a court order for DNA testing of the crime
scene evidence. The DNA tests excluded me as the source of the biological evidence.

The investigation by the Innocence Project also discovered that the lab analyst who
conducted the analysis of the blood and semen recovered in the case falsely testified that I
could not be eliminated as the source of the evidence. The analyst’s bench notes of his
testing actually excluded me. Those notes were never given to my defense attorney.

https:/A richmond. ini i ith-h ‘d-col it gh-to-abolish-th icle_27522f49-4864-57d2-b2a... 2/4

12/22/2019 Keith Harward column: Innocence reason enough to abolish the death penalty | Columnists | richmond.com
The DNA profile from the crime scene evidence was identified as that of Jerry L. Crotty,
another sailor on the U.S.S. Carl Vinson at the time of these crimes. Crotty died in prison
in Ohio in 2006, where he was sentenced for numerous crimes, including abduction and
attempted burglary.

On April 7, 2016, the Virginia Supreme Court issued a writ of actual innocence, my
convictions were dismissed and I was released after spending 33 years in prison.

If I had been sentenced to death back in 1986, the commonwealth would have executed me
in the 1990s along with 65 other men. And no one would have ever known that I was
innocent.

Virginia has executed 113 men since the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the death penalty to
resume in 1976. Only one person, Earl Washington, has been exonerated after being
sentenced to die in Virginia. However, some of those killed by the commonwealth went to
the execution chamber claiming their innocence. Only God knows how many were in fact
innocent.

Since 1976, there have been 166 people exonerated in the United States after being
sentenced to death for crimes that they did not commit. In that same time period 1,510
have been executed. That is a ratio of one innocent person for every nine killed by the
state. Most people will agree that is an unacceptable and intolerable error rate.

I am only one of 18 people in Virginia who have been exonerated after being wrongfully
convicted of murder since 1989. Who knows how many others may still be behind bars for
murders that they did not carry out. Our criminal justice system makes mistakes more

https:/A richmond. ini i ith-h ‘d-col it gh-to-abolish-th icle_27522f49-4864-57d2-b2a... 3/4

12/22/2019 Keith Harward column: Innocence reason enough to abolish the death penalty | Columnists | richmond.com

often that we would like to admit.

It is time for the General Assembly to abolish capital punishment here in the
commonwealth. The risk of executing an innocent person is simply too high.

Even though it took 33 years for me to walk out of prison, I am now free to eat what I want
and go where I want. I can enjoy the company of family, friends and neighbors. I can
appreciate the simple joys of camping and nature.

There is no way that we can undo the terrible mistake of executing an innocent person.
That alone is reason enough for ending the practice of capital punishment.

I urge the Virginia General Assembly to abolish the death penalty during its 2020
legislative session.

https:/A richmond. ini i ith-h ‘d-col it gh-to-abolish-th icle_27522f49-4864-57d2-b2a... 4/4

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
December 29, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.