Richmond Magazine Article "'A profoundly racist institution' Virginia repeals the death penalty after more than four centuries, highlighting the practice's history of racial disparity", 2021 April 7, 2021 April 8

Online content

Fullscreen
4/8/2021 ‘A Profoundly Racist Institution’ - richmondmagazine.com

‘A Profoundly Racist Institution’

Virginia repeals the death penalty after more than four centuries, highlighting the practice’s history of racial
disparity

by Rodrigo Arriaza
April 7, 2021 9:41 AM

RSS Print

Illustration by Victoria Borges

For Rachel Sutphin, the execution of her father’s killer didn’t bring a sense of solace
or retribution. Instead, it only reminded her of past trauma and uncovered what she
now sees as an immoral institution.

“The death penalty itself has never felt comfortable for me because it’s the state
killing someone as punishment for killing someone, in hopes of preventing more
killings later,” Sutphin says. “Instead of there being any justice and redemption,
there’s just more death.”

113

4/8/2021 ‘A Profoundly Racist Institution’ - richmondmagazine.com
Her father, Montgomery County Sheriff's Deputy Cpl. Eric Sutphin, was one of two
men who were killed in 2006 by William Morva during an attempted escape from
state custody. After learning that Morva suffered from severe mental illness, Sutphin
began advocating publicly for ending the death penalty when former Gov. Terry
McAuliffe denied Morva’s petition for clemency in 2017.

With advocates like Sutphin in mind, the Virginia General Assembly approved
legislation to end capital punishment in the commonwealth, with Gov. Ralph Northam
signing the bill into law on March 24, more than four centuries after the first execution
in American history took place at Jamestown. Virginia is now the 23rd state to ban
the practice.

More than 1,400 Virginians have been executed since 1608, more than in any other
state. However, there hasn’t been a new death sentence in Virginia since 2011, and
Morva was the last person to be executed here, in 2017.

Del. Mike Mullin (D-Newport News), who introduced one of two bills seeking to end
the practice, says the risk of executing an innocent person through his work as a
prosecutor in Hampton has kept him awake at night. According to the Death
Penalty Information Center (DPIC), 185 former death-row prisoners in the U.S.
have been exonerated of all charges since 1973.

“First and foremost, this is a profoundly racist institution, and you cannot extricate the
death penalty from racism,” Mullin says.

Virginia’s record of executions reveals a history of racial disparity. According to DPIC,
state laws in the 1800s codified capital crimes by race so that Black Virginians could
receive a death sentence for a much broader range of crimes than white defendants.
Virginia executed 73 Black men for rape, attempted rape or robbery from 1900 to
1969, a period in which no white men were executed for those same crimes.

LaKeisha Cook, criminal justice reform organizer for the Virginia Interfaith
Center for Public Policy, says Virginia's racially uneven history with executions
can be directly linked to slavery and lynchings during the Jim Crow era. Cook
coalesced the support of hundreds of Virginia churches to advocate for death penalty
abolition, including broad support from the Black faith community. Cook and others
hope to see the end of the death penalty spur further moves toward a more equitable
criminal justice system.

2/3

4/8/2021 ‘A Profoundly Racist Institution’ - richmondmagazine.com
“When our faith leaders understood that direct connection and were armed with the
statistics of how many African Americans have been disproportionately impacted by
capital punishment ... they [agreed to] join voices with everyone else in saying that
it's time for abolition,” Cook says.

by Rodrigo Arriaza
April 7, 2021 9:41 AM

3/3

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
December 29, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.