Godanriver Article "Should the death penalty be put to death? The verdict is not unanimous", 2021 February 15, 2021 February 16

Online content

Fullscreen
2/16/2021 WATCH NOW: Should the death penalty be put to death? The verdict is not unanimous. | Crime News | godanriver.com

Should the death penalty be put to death? The verdict is not
unanimous.

John Crane Feb 15, 2021

Virginia appears on the verge of doing away with capital punishment, and, perhaps
predictably, attorneys across the Southside — including one lawmaker — have strong

opposing viewpoints.

The Virginia Senate voted Feb. 3 to abolish the death penalty, and the House of
Delegates did the same two days later.

Should Gov. Ralph Northam add his signature, Virginia — a state with a reputation for

executions — would become the first from the former Confederacy to take that step.

One of the cosponsors of the legislation is state Sen. Bill Stanley, R-Franklin
County, whose district includes Danville, Martinsville and Pittsylvania, Henry and

Patrick counties. Stanley abstained from voting on the final law because other senators

cd. hould-the-death-penalty-be-put-to-death-the-verdict a icle_a5c1622... 1/6


2/16/2021 WATCH NOW: Should the death penalty be put to death? The verdict is not unanimous. | Crime News | godanriver.com

IN

Sen. Bill Stanley, R-Franklin County, spoke Tuesday.
Stanley opposes the death penalty but offered a
substitute bill dealing with mandatory life sentences.

BOB BROWN

rejected his amendment that called for a
mandatory minimum of life in prison for
anyone convicted of aggravated murder

— which would replace "capital murder"

under the new legislation.

But Stanley has said he believes, from a
small-government, conservative
perspective, it just makes sense to take
this step. He declined to be interviewed
and directed a reporter to his words in an
op-ed piece he wrote for The Roanoke

Times.

"Capital punishment empowers the
government with an awesome authority
to which it is not entitled,” Stanley wrote

in the column published Jan. 31.

But it's an authority that Virginia has
wielded often and, in some cases,

indiscriminately.

The Death Penalty Information Center, a nonprofit based in Washington, D.C., said the

first execution in what is now the United States took place in Virginia, when Capt.

George Kendall was put to death in the Jamestown colony in 1608 for spying for Spain.

And data compiled by the center show that Virginia has executed a higher percentage of

its death-row prisoners than any other state.

The most recent execution in Virginia was in 2017, when William Morva was put to

death for killing an unarmed security guard and a deputy sheriff in Montgomery County

in 2006.

The Martinsville 7

icle_a5c1622... 2/6

2/16/2021 WATCH NOW: Should the death penalty be put to death? The verdict is not unanimous. | Crime News | godanriver.com

The Martinsville Seven were (top row, from left) Francis Grayson, James L. Hairston, Howard Lee Hairston,
Booker T. Millner and (bottom row, from left) John Clabon Taylor, Joe Henry Hampton and Frank Hairston Jr.

From 1900 through 1977 — the year the U.S. Supreme Court declared the death penalty
unconstitutional for crimes in which no one was killed — Virginia executed 73 Black

defendants for rape, attempted rape or armed robbery that did not result in death.
But no white defendants were executed for those crimes during that same time period.

On February 1951, the state executed seven Black inmates — four on Feb. 2, three on
Feb. 5 — who had come to be known as the "Martinsville 7," accused of raping a white

woman in 1949. All of them when arrested were between the ages of 18 and 23.

"Historians believe that [at] least five of the men were innocent," the Death Penalty
Information Center has published. "After giving coerced confessions, the men were
convicted and sentenced to death by all-white male juries in perfunctory trials that

lasted less than one day each."

Northam has been asked to pardon the seven, and there were rallies earlier this month
on their behalf in commemoration of the 50th anniversary of their executions.

Prosecutors’ weapon

cd. hould-the-death-penalty-be-put-to-death-the-verdict-is-not il icle_a5c1622... 3/6


2/16/2021 WATCH NOW: Should the death penalty be put to death? The verdict is not unanimous. | Crime News | godanriver.com
Perhaps unsurprisingly, some
prosecutors say the death penalty should
remain so it can be applied in cases
involving the most depraved acts of

murder.

"There are simply cases that call for the
ultimate punishment," Danville

Commonwealth Attorney Michael

Newman said.

Newman

Henry County Commonwealth Attorney
Andrew Nester said he supports keeping the death penalty and sees it being applied for
the most violent, heinous crimes.

"These are not simple murders; these are what I call 'murder-plus' — murder plus rape,

murder of a police officer," Nester said.

Prosecutors across the state use the death penalty very sparingly and only when it is

warranted, he pointed out.

Taking away that option would remove "that certain sting" that could result from

committing a depraved act, Nester said he believes.
"Once you remove that, you remove that deterrent from society,” Nester said.

Capital punishment, in some cases, can also provide closure for relatives of murder

victims, he said.

If the state does eliminate the death penalty, Newman said he hopes a mandatory life

sentence for those convicted of capital - or aggravated - murder would be preserved.

On the other side

Danville Public Defender Joseph Schenk said, "Generally, I think it's a good thing to do
away with the death penalty. I don't think it serves much purpose in today's society."

cd. hould-the-death-penalty-be-put-to-death-the-verdict a il icle_a5c1622... 4/6

2/16/2021

Henry County Commonwealth Attorney Andrew Nester

John Crane

WATCH NOW: Should the death penalty be put to death? The verdict is not unanimous. | Crime News | godanriver.com

From a practical standpoint, death
penalty cases simply require much more

labor for attorneys, he said.

Not only do the defense attorneys have to
attack the charges from every direction
and fight for their client's innocence, he
said, but attorneys also have to explore

every avenue of mitigation.

"There's so much work involved, we
stopped representing people in death-
penalty cases," Schenk said. "We no
longer had the manpower to take on
those cases because of the workload."

The truest cost
And, Stanley wrote, the death penalty

comes with more financial costs.

"Many people think executions save the

judicial system and the taxpayers’ money," Stanley wrote in his Op-Ed. "Actually, it costs

more for the government to execute an individual than it does to have them spend life in

prison without parole."

He also pointed out that innocent people have been sentenced to die in the U.S.

"Evidence we once thought reliable, like eyewitness identification, is not always

accurate," Stanley wrote.

More than 170 people sentenced to death in the U.S. have ended up being exonerated,

including Earl Washington in Virginia, Stanley pointed out.

icle_a5c1622... 5/6

2/16/2021 WATCH NOW: Should the death penalty be put to death? The verdict is not unanimous. | Crime News | godanriver.com
"If the government kills someone and later finds out they were innocent, we simply
cannot rectify that horrible mistake," he wrote. "Conservatives like me do not believe the

government should have this ultimate authority."

cd. hould-the-death Ity-be-put-to-death-the-verdict a icle_a5c1622... 6/6


Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
December 23, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.