Richmond Times-Dispatch Article "Severe Mental Illness reduces culpability", 2016 December 3

Online content

Fullscreen
Severe mental

illness reduces

culpability

Segutiecee ty lanaae pate di
ka besa the at his

someone who had just
been found insane —
meaning he did not know
the nature of his acts, or
that they were wrong —
could now be sentenced to
death.

against
Pecos eI ga hs 8
mission of all experts, did not have the
highest culpability.

Such severely mentally ill people
should not be eligible for execution. And
yet prosecutors continue to charge peo-
ple who have substantial mental health

Per artes beer Ling,
Brown pen talnete bara,

ratically, and over the Mayan
calendar, the book of Revelation, and
conspiracy theories. He left with his girl-
friend to live in the woods in an aban-
doned cabin, “eating bark off a tree and
drinking water out of a stream.” Brown
had stopped sleeping.

After Brown shot the trooper he took
his clothes off and fled into the woods.
He had no sane motive to do this. He
later said God told him to shoot the
trooper. bene sender we
Bane ypety ab a ratio:

and deliberate killer.

Arguably, he should have been found
i eattoot

defendants insane is that jurors are not
told that such confinement occurs ifa

Siigibe for py the atts penal Tie
tion would reme ths
essg.ey provide a alsa for de-
fendants who fell short of being found
not guilty Ups of insanity, but who

suffer from serious mental

illnesses such as schizophrenia or bi-
disorder. A te that, if

, the it would re-

ieee vs! 01d a aiaaa acne

with sever or
with bipolar disorder, for example, are
simply not the worst of the worst mur-

tencing to death severely mentally ill
people who cannot ae sith blamed for
their actions.

Garretts the lustice

Adefendant with the kind
of severe impairments
suffered by Russell Brown
should not even be eligible
for the death penalty. The
proposed legislation would
remedy this issue.

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
December 29, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted with the exception of select items noted in Series 5.
Collection terms of access:
This page may contain links to digital objects. Access to these images and the technical capacity to download them does not imply permission for re-use. Digital objects may be used freely for personal reference use, referred to, or linked to from other web sites. Researchers do not have permission to publish or disseminate material from these collections without permission from an archivist and/or the copyright holder. The researcher assumes full responsibility for conforming to the laws of copyright. Some materials in these collections may be protected by the U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S.C.) and/or by the copyright or neighboring-rights laws of other nations. More information about U.S. Copyright is provided by the Copyright Office. Additionally, re-use may be restricted by terms of University Libraries gift or purchase agreements, donor restrictions, privacy and publicity rights, licensing and trademarks. The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.