Response and Recommendations Upon Review of the Recent Decision to Set Aside the 2015 ICWA ruling by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Letter, 2018

Online content

Fullscreen
 
 
The Society of 
Indian Psychologists 
 
Executive Board 
President: Gayle Skawen:nio  Morse 
President-Elect: Iva GreyWolf  
Past President: Art Blume 
Secretary: Royleen J. Ross  
Treasurer: BJ Boyd 
 
1 
 
Response and Recommendations Upon Review of the 
Recent Decision to Set Aside the 2015 ICWA ruling by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals 
Respectfully Submitted on behalf of the Society of Indian Psychologists, 
this day of November 6, 2018 
by Wendy M. K. Peters, PhD, Royleen J. Ross, PhD, Julii M. Green, PhD, Iva GreyWolf, PhD, 
Mohamed Abdallah, MA 
 
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas recently published a 
decision declaring the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) unconstitutional. The Court concluded 
that: (a) ICWA is race-based; (b) ICWA violates the non-delegation doctrine; (c) ICWA imposes 
federal standards and jurisdiction over the states’ authority and proceedings; (d) the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs (BIA) also lacks certain authority; and (e) that Congress was without authority to 
enact the ICWA (Pierson, 2018). Yet, we, the Society of Indian Psychologists, many of whom 
are enrolled members of different tribal nations, who are also law-abiding citizens of these 
United States of America, and most significantly, who are scholars, professionals, and experts in 
the mental and behavioral health and wellbeing of American Indians and other Native peoples, 
respectfully ask why this egregious decision is being imposed upon those who have already 
suffered so much under the will and aegis of the United States Government? 
The Historical Relationship Between Native Americans and the U.S. Government 
The value of history lies in the knowledge it can impart. Yet, the power of history is 
wielded through mankind’s individual and collectivistic ability to learn from it. However, when 
it comes to Native Americans (American Indians, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians), the 
authoritative and hegemonic tendencies that began with the first colonists and settlers persist 
 
 
The Society of 
Indian Psychologists 
 
Executive Board 
President: Gayle Skawen:nio  Morse 
President-Elect: Iva GreyWolf  
Past President: Art Blume 
Secretary: Royleen J. Ross  
Treasurer: BJ Boyd 
 
2 
 
even today, and furthermore, have been abusive and exploitative of this great nation’s First 
Peoples. Thus, we ask, has nothing been learned by those who colonized us or who settled our 
homelands? Has the U.S. Government, in its infinite wisdom, failed to grasp how much harm its 
legal policies and overreach are causing to Native people and their communities? Despite the 
centuries that have transpired since colonists first came to the shores of our great lands, Native 
peoples continue to encounter and experience blatant elements of discrimination and 
marginalization.  
For generations now, Native people have fought to be self-determining. Sovereignty 
notwithstanding, Native people have continually endured grievous burdens such as the 
involuntary loss of their children to boarding schools, forced relocation (Weaver, 1998), and 
now, with the unconscionable overturning of the ICWA (Pierson, 2018), all at the whim of the 
U.S. government. Native languages have been outlawed, discouraged, and some have even been 
lost altogether. Even religious freedoms, a right bestowed by the first amendment of the U.S. 
Constitution, have at times been challenged for Native Americans. The Declaration of 
Independence declares the unalienable right of Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all 
U. S. Citizens, yet Native people have endured sundown laws, Jim Crow laws, and paternalistic 
dominion over the natural resources found on reservation lands (e.g.: water, petroleum, precious 
metals, uranium, etc.). The ramifications of such longstanding and inequitable policies have 
ultimately contributed to a pervasive state of poverty, socioeconomic decline, and the most 
severe health disparities of any ethnic minority in the U.S. (Gross, 2003; Walters et al., 2011) 
 
 
The Society of 
Indian Psychologists 
 
Executive Board 
President: Gayle Skawen:nio  Morse 
President-Elect: Iva GreyWolf  
Past President: Art Blume 
Secretary: Royleen J. Ross  
Treasurer: BJ Boyd 
 
3 
 
Moreover, these conditions are not merely a result of unintended consequences. Rather, they 
evidence a pattern of deep-rooted, systemic malice toward Native Americans. 
Prior to the instatement of the ICWA in 1978, the custodial rights of Native parents had 
constantly been challenged because Native people were deemed unfit to care for their own 
children (Unger, 1977). Supported by the doctrine of parens patriae, which grants the inherent 
power and authority of the state to protect persons who are legally unable to act on their own 
behalf, authorities encouraged the transracial adoption of American Indian and Alaska Native 
children away from family, community, and tribe, resulting in the disproportionate placement of 
Native children to non-Native homes (Unger, 1977). The passage of the ICWA was a significant 
turning point in policy to legislation that was focused on preserving tribal families and 
communities (Gross, 2003; Mannes, 1995). The ICWA gave tribal courts supreme jurisdiction 
with respect to the placement of Native children domiciled within the boundaries of tribal 
lands. The tribes also had legal jurisdiction of Native children living outside reservation 
boundaries, but the statutory language of parens patriae emboldened legal challenges because 
U.S. authorities continue to impute Native people as being unfit to care for their own children, 
thereby stigmatizing all Native parents (Renick, 2018).  
Harms Inflicted 
The health inequities experienced by Native Americans can largely be attributed to their 
history. Social suffering, inflicted over centuries, has resulted in a disproportionate burden of ill 
health and psychological issues such as those related to identity; a lack of coping skills in 
contending with trauma, and vicarious trauma, to name a few (Adelson, 2005). Recent research 
 
 
The Society of 
Indian Psychologists 
 
Executive Board 
President: Gayle Skawen:nio  Morse 
President-Elect: Iva GreyWolf  
Past President: Art Blume 
Secretary: Royleen J. Ross  
Treasurer: BJ Boyd 
 
4 
 
has also posited Intergenerational/Historical Trauma as the overarching narrative linking the 
myriad of bio-psycho-social harms as interrelated and putting them into a context that focuses on 
lived experience, generation upon generation (Walters et al., 2011). Native people also 
experience very high and disproportionate suicide rates due to difficulty in coping with despair. 
Today, many Native people are unaware of the history and how negative government policies 
have impacted their lives. Instead, they are commonly pathologized as having deficit or defect. 
In fact, the majority of Native people are young and under 30. Yet, for American Indian/Alaska 
Natives (AI/AN) within this age range, the suicide completion rates are more than triple (35.7%) 
that of Whites (11.1%) under 30 (Leavitt et al., 2018).  
Although less prone to suicide, AI/AN women are far more likely to experience 
interpersonal violence (including sexual assault) than any other ethnic group in the United States 
(Rosay and National Institute of Justice (U.S.), 2016). Yet, distressingly, there is not even a 
centralized database to track the many Missing and Murdered Indigenous [Native] Women and 
Girls (MMIWG), who have disappeared in growing numbers over the past few decades, never to 
be seen alive or heard from again. The vanishing of these women, some of whom have underage 
children, oftentimes results in guardianship, custody, and adoption legalities that should be 
determined solely by the tribal court systems. Consequently, Native children have not fared too 
well under the authority of public child welfare agencies either (Fox, 2003; Willeto, 2007).  
Native individuals, many of whom were stolen from their relatives or tribal communities 
in childhood, as well as transcultural adoptees, have experienced a multitude of complex mental 
health maladies associated with removal from their tribal origins. These issues have to do with 
 
 
The Society of 
Indian Psychologists 
 
Executive Board 
President: Gayle Skawen:nio  Morse 
President-Elect: Iva GreyWolf  
Past President: Art Blume 
Secretary: Royleen J. Ross  
Treasurer: BJ Boyd 
 
5 
 
identity formation enigmas, or not knowing one’s origins, and can instill a deep emotional 
impact with feelings of being robbed of identity, and are often reinforced by messages imputed 
by the dominant society of being no good (Hilleary, 2018). Still others, have sought to reconnect 
with their tribal families and communities, expressing ideas such as: I was adopted and I’m 
looking for my tribe, I want to know who my parents are . . ., and I want to know who my 
relatives are (American Bar Association, 2017). Survivors of the boarding school era have 
expressed feelings and experiences that are very similar to those of the adoptees (Mannes, 1995). 
Media exposure promoting negative stereotypes, images, and negative news about Native 
people not only reinforces stereotypes, but also normalizes violence and takes a heavy 
psychological toll on Native populations who are routinely exposed to messages that insinuate 
their inferior status. For example, the drunken Indian stereotype persists, however, research has 
demonstrated that the rates of abstinence from alcohol are highest among Native Americans as 
compared to other ethnic groups (Cunningham et al., 2016). Yet, facts such as these are typically 
ignored or seldom publicized at best.  
Legalities also tend to compound the harms to Native people. Complex jurisdictional 
boundaries affecting Indian country have resulted in an over representation of Native people 
being incarcerated (Rolnick and Arya, 2008; Rolnick, 2015). However, as the Society of Indian 
Psychologists, we are not scholars of the law. Yet, we contend that if the law is causing harm to 
Native people, then it must be changed! As the Society of Indian Psychologists, we are scholars, 
professionals, and experts in the mental and behavioral health and wellbeing of American 
Indians and other Native peoples, and we implore all who would perpetuate harm to Native 
 
 
The Society of 
Indian Psychologists 
 
Executive Board 
President: Gayle Skawen:nio  Morse 
President-Elect: Iva GreyWolf  
Past President: Art Blume 
Secretary: Royleen J. Ross  
Treasurer: BJ Boyd 
 
6 
 
peoples to cease and desist all actions that are contrary to the welfare and wellbeing of Native 
people. It is well past the time to abate such callous behavior toward Native Americans. 
We Need Our Children and They Need Us 
Despite the oppression, subjugation, and disenfranchisement of the basic liberties that 
Americans enjoy, Native peoples possess an indomitable Spirit that will not be broken. We 
recognize the beauty of our Native cultures, the wisdom inherent in Native values, and we want 
to impart our seeds of knowledge and sustain the legacy of our ancestry to our children such that 
they will come to know and love all parts of themselves, despite our long history of 
condemnation. To continue the removal of Native children from their cultural roots will only 
reinforce internalized racism. One of the key things that helps to define Native people, as 
nations, tribes, as individuals, and even as human beings, is our sense of self-identity and our 
collective knowledges of the past. Native people yet prevail, we are still here, we need our 
children, and more importantly, they need us!  
 
 
 
 
The Society of 
Indian Psychologists 
 
Executive Board 
President: Gayle Skawen:nio  Morse 
President-Elect: Iva GreyWolf  
Past President: Art Blume 
Secretary: Royleen J. Ross  
Treasurer: BJ Boyd 
 
7 
 
References 
 Adelson, N. (2005). The embodiment of inequity: health disparities in aboriginal Canada. 
Canadian Journal of Public Health = Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique, 96 Suppl 2, 
S45–S61. 
American Bar Association. (2017, February). The Importance of Measuring Case Outcomes in 
Indian Child Welfare Cases. American Bar Association. Retrieved from 
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/child_law/resources/child_law_practiceonline/child
_law_practice/vol-36/january-2017/the-importance-of-measuring-case-outcomes-in-
indian-child-welfar/ 
Cunningham, J. K., Solomon, T. A., & Muramoto, M. L. (2016). Alcohol use among Native 
Americans compared to whites: Examining the veracity of the ‘Native American elevated 
alcohol consumption’ belief. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 160, 65–75. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.015 
Fox, K. A. (2003). Collecting Data on the Abuse and Neglect of American Indian Children. 
Child Welfare, 82(6), 707–726. 
Gross, E. R. (2003). Native American Family Continuity as Resistance: The Indian Child 
Welfare Act as Legitimation for an Effective Social Work Practice. Journal of Social 
Work, 3(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017303003001003 
Hilleary, C. (2018, January 18). Native Americans Confront the Legacy of Adoption. VOA. 
Retrieved from https://www.voanews.com/a/native-americans-confront-the-legacy-of-
adoption/4213293.html 
Leavitt, R. A., Ertl, A., Sheats, K., Petrosky, E., Ivey-Stephenson, A., & Fowler, K. A. (2018). 
Suicides Among American Indian/Alaska Natives — National Violent Death Reporting 
System, 18 States, 2003–2014. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67(8), 
237–242. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6708a1 
Mannes, M. (1995). Factors and Events Leading to the Passage of the Indian Child Welfare Act. 
Child Welfare, 74(1), 264. 
Pierson, B. L. (2018, October). Texas federal court holds the Indian Child Welfare Act 
unconstitutional. The National Law Review. Retrieved from 
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/indian-nations-law-update-october-2018 
 
 
The Society of 
Indian Psychologists 
 
Executive Board 
President: Gayle Skawen:nio  Morse 
President-Elect: Iva GreyWolf  
Past President: Art Blume 
Secretary: Royleen J. Ross  
Treasurer: BJ Boyd 
 
8 
 
Renick, C. (2018, October 9). The Nation’s First Family Separation Policy. The Chronicle of 
Social Change. Retrieved from https://chronicleofsocialchange.org/child-welfare-
2/nations-first-family-separation-policy-indian-child-welfare-act/32431 
Rolnick, A., & Arya, N. (2008). A Tangled Web of Justice: American Indian and Alaska Native 
Youth in Federal, State, and Tribal Justice Systems. Scholarly Works. Retrieved from 
https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/981 
Rolnick, A. C. Oversight Hearing on Juvenile Justice in Indian Country: Challenges and 
Promising Strategies (2015). Las Vegas, NV: William S. Boyd School of Law, University 
of Las Vegas. Retrieved from http://scholars.law.unlv.edu/congtestimony/2 
Rosay, A., & National Institute of Justice (U.S.). (2016). Violence against American Indian and 
Alaska Native women and men: 2010 findings from the National Intimate Partner and 
Sexual Violence Survey (Vols. 1–1 online resource (ix, 67 pages) : illustrations.). 
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved from 
http://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/gpo68678 
Unger, S. (1977). The Destruction of American Indian families (Vols. 1–1 online resource (iv, 90 
pages)). New York: Association on American Indian Affairs. Retrieved from 
http://books.google.com/books?id=qSRCAAAAIAAJ 
Walters, K. L., Mohammed, S. A., Evans-Campbell, T., Beltrán, R. E., Chae, D. H., & Duran, B. 
(2011). Bodies don’t just tell stories, they tell histories. Du Bois Review: Social Science 
Research on Race, 8(01), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X1100018X 
Weaver, H. N. (1998). Indigenous People in a Multicultural Society: Unique Issues for Human 
Services. Social Work, 43(3), 203. 
Willeto, A. A. A. (2007). Native American kids: American Indian children’s well-being 
indicators for the nation and two states. Social Indicators Research, 83(1), 149–176. 
 

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Image for license or rights statement.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Date Uploaded:
February 27, 2024

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted.
Collection terms of access:
The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.