SIP Position on Indian Mascots, 1999

Online content

Fullscreen
Society of Indian Psychologists of the Americas
January 27, 1999 
Draft letter in support of "retiring" all Indian personalities as the official symbols and
mascots of universities, colleges or schools (and athletic teams). 
We the undersigned members of the Society of Indian Psychologists of the Americas, 
write this letter in support of "retiring" all Indian personalities as the official symbols and 
mascots of universities, colleges or schools (and athletic teams). We support doing so 
because of a variety of concerns related to the ethical practice of psychology. As a 
professional society of psychologists we operate under these professional ethical 
guidelines. 
We are concerned that the continued use of Indian symbols and mascots seriously 
compromises our ability to engage in ethical professional practice and service to the 
campus (delete campus if addressing all mascots) community. We believe that it 
establishes an unwelcome academic environment for Indian (students, staff, and 
faculty) and contributes to the mis-education of all members of the (campus) community
regarding the cultural practices and traditions of an entire ethnic group. In our view, the 
use of an historically and culturally inaccurate, stereotypic image undermines the 
educational experience of all members of the (University) community. It seems 
especially problematic for those who have had little or no contact with Indian people and
their cultures. 
Stereotypical and historically inaccurate images of Indians in general interfere with 
learning about them by creating, supporting and maintaining oversimplified and 
inaccurate views of indigenous peoples and their cultures. When stereotypical 
representations are taken as factual information, they contribute to the development of 
cultural biases and prejudices, (clearly a contradiction to the educational mission of the 
University.) In the same vein, we believe that continuation of the use of Indians as 
symbols and mascots is incongruous with the philosophy espoused by many Americans
as promoting inclusivity and diversity. 
We understand that some affiliated with the institutions having a long history of use of 
these symbols may have a special attachment to them. We also understand and believe
that this attachment may not have been formed out of maliciousness or negative 
intentions. To the extent, however, that tradition and/or economic issues are major 
obstacles to change, they should not usurp the principles of a society struggling to put 
an end to racism. What once may have been unifying symbols for the various bodies 
using these symbols has become a source of cross-cultural conflict. In light of all of 
these factors, we strongly support and encourage the all such entities to develop a new 
symbol consistent with and contributing to the positive realization of national principles 
(our educational mission.) 
In support of our concern about the ethically problematic nature of this issue for the 
professional practice of psychology, we cite relevant portions of the "Ethical Principles 
of Psychologists and Code of Conduct" (American Psychological Association [APA, 
1992]) and the "Guidelines for Providers of Psychological Services to Ethnic, Linguistic 
and Culturally Diverse Populations" (APA, 1992). 
Principle D (Respect for People's Rights and Dignity) states: 

Psychologists accord appropriate respect to the fundamental rights, dignity, and 
worth of all people. They respect the rights of individuals to privacy, 
confidentiality, self-determination, and autonomy, mindful that legal and other 
obligations may lead to inconsistency and conflict with the exercise of these 
rights. Psychologists are aware of cultural, individual, and role differences, 
including those due to age, gender, race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, 
sexual orientation, disability, language, and socioeconomic status. Psychologists 
try to eliminate the effect on their work of biases based on those factors, and they
do not knowingly participate in or condone unfair discriminatory practices. 
Principle E (Concern for Others' Welfare) states: 

Psychologists seek to contribute to the welfare of those with whom they interact 
professionally. In their professional actions, psychologists weigh the welfare and 
rights of their patients or clients, students, supervisees, human research 
participants, and other affected persons.... 
When conflicts occur among psychologists' obligations or concerns, they attempt 
to resolve these conflicts and to perform their roles in a responsible fashion that 
avoids or minimizes harm. Psychologists are sensitive to real and ascribed 
differences in power between themselves and others, and they do not exploit or 
mislead other people during or after professional relationships. 
Principle F (Social Responsibility) states: 

Psychologists are aware of their professional and scientific responsibilities to the 
community and the society in which they work and live. They apply and make 
public their knowledge of psychology in order to contribute to human welfare. 
Psychologists are concerned about and work to mitigate the causes of human 
suffering. When undertaking research, they strive to advance human welfare and
the science of psychology. Psychologists try to avoid misuse of their work. 
Psychologists comply with the law and encourage the development of law and 
social policy that serve the interests of their patients and clients and the public.. 
In addition, several of the "Guidelines for Providers of Psychological Services to Ethnic, 
Linguistic and Culturally Diverse Populations" also address our concerns on this issue. 
#5. Psychologists respect client's religious and/or spiritual beliefs and values, including 
attributions and taboos, since they affect world view, psychosocial functioning, and 
expressions of distress. 

a. Part of working in minority communities is to become familiar with indigenous 
beliefs and practices and respect them. 
# 7. Psychologists consider the impact of adverse social, environmental and political 
factors in assessing problems and designing interventions. 

b. Psychologists work within the cultural setting to improve the welfare of all 
persons concerned, if there is a conflict between cultural values and human 
rights. 
#8. Psychologists attend to as well as work to eliminate biases, prejudices, and 
discriminatory practices. 

a. Psychologists acknowledge relevant discriminatory practices at the social and 
community level that may be affecting the psychological welfare of the population
being served." 
We applaud the current efforts across the nation to have this crucial issue raised and 
addressed in a responsible and productive way. It is our hope this letter contributes to 
that effort. 

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Image for license or rights statement.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Date Uploaded:
March 6, 2024

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted.
Collection terms of access:
The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.