When Did We Lose Our Humanity?, 2020 December 14

Online content

Fullscreen
Check for web archive captures

When Did We Lose Our Humanity?

By lynmiller-lachmann on 2020-12-14 22:44:13

Eight years ago today a gunman entered Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. In the next minutes he
murdered twenty small children, their principal, and five other teachers and staff. Despite calls for bans on semiautomatic
weapons, the result was a combination of inaction and cruelty. Parents of those killed had to put up with death threats and
accusations that the massacre never happened and they were merely “crisis actors.” Some states (not Connecticut) actually
loosened gun regulations, among other measures allowing teachers to bring guns into classrooms. I was living in Portugal at
the time of the Sandy Hook massacre, and my friends there expressed both sympathy and incredulity. I think about that day
constantly, sometimes wondering why I returned to the United States and why my family continues to live here. My
daughter teaches first and second graders — the same age as the students whose classrooms were violated on December 14,

2012. I fear for her and the students she loves. Eas I thought about that day as
sirens wailed all night long in New York City last March and April, and the rest of the country didn’t seem to care because
the first people to suffer the ravages of covid-19 were urban dwellers in predominantly Democratic states —
disproportionately Black, brown, elderly, disabled, and poor. Our health care workers lacked protective equipment and fell
ill themselves. Now we have learned that the federal government diverted supplies and failed to invoke the Defense
Production Act because the virus didn’t seem to affect them and their own. Some people believed covid-19 to be divine
punishment for people with different political opinions and ways of life. Today, the anniversary of the massacre, is also the
day that the death toll from covid-19 hit 300,000, by far the largest death toll in the world and one of the highest per capita.
Still, people refuse to wear masks to protect themselves and others. Masks have become a political statement, communicated
from the top levels of government where those who fall ill receive costly, scarce cutting-edge treatment unavailable to the
rest of us. Last April, when experts predicted a death toll by the end of the year of 100,000 to 240,000 Americans and those
in power shrugged it off, I told my husband that we lost all illusions of our collective humanity in the aftermath of the Sandy
Hook massacre: Why would a country that didn’t care about the slaughter of schoolchildren care about mass death from a
virus that could be significantly reduced through basic public health measures? And what else do we not care about? We are
shrugging off the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. The president appointed a doctor to the coronavirus advisory
committee who suggested that everyone in the country contract the virus in order to create “herd immunity.” At our current
hospital capacity, this theory would result in 2-6 million deaths and many times that number left with permanent disabilities.
(Herd immunity doesn’t work either, because antibodies decline and many people have caught covid twice.) Our lack of
outrage allows crimes against humanity. First, it’s 26 children and their educators. Now, it’s hundreds of thousands of
people. What will we shrug off next? When do we admit that for many in this country — including those who call
themselves pro-life — life isn’t precious but cheap? [caption id="attachment_ 14862" align="alignright" width="300"]

: Outside the International Criminal Court at The Hague.[/caption] Are we
going back to 5 the ti time when people had many children because they expected few of them to survive to adulthood? We are
sentient beings, with complex emotions and ties to others and with plans for the future. Our humanity is not consistent with

an anthill mentality, in which worker and warrior ants are born to serve and die for a queen. This is why we have a Universal
Declaration of Human Rights and a judicial process to try leaders of governments and irregular armies for crimes against
humanity. While 81 million people — a majority of the highest voter turnout numbers in history — rejected a president
whose callousness in the face of the pandemic was but one aspect of an overall climate of cruel authoritarianism, we still
have 74 million people who chose that path. Because of gerrymandering and a Senate that gives disproportionate power to
lightly-populated rural states, the current president’s party continues to dominate despite a minority of votes. Thus the
inaction on common sense gun reforms and the continued lack of disaster aid for the pandemic’s economic fallout. We need
to address this power imbalance, but above that, we need a moral awakening. With a pandemic raging and a climate crisis
looming, we can’t accept the mentality of the anthill, of death over life.


Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
October 23, 2025

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted.
Collection terms of access:
The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.