Courier-Journal.com Article "Man Sent to Death Row is Acquited in Retrial, Original Conviction Thrown out on an Appeal; Defendant was 17 When Whitley Couple Slain", 2014 August 2

Online content

Fullscreen
Daily news from Louisville, Kentucky and Southern Indiana from courier-
journal.com 
       
            Home · News · Sports · Business · Features · Louisville Scene · 
            Classifieds · Jobs · Cars · Homes · Marketplace · Contact Us · 
            Search 
            Local/Regional » News Item Friday, August 2, 2002 
            Man sent to death row is acquitted in retrial 
            Original conviction thrown out on appeal; defendant was 17 when 
            Whitley couple slain 
            By Deborah Yetter 
            The Courier-Journal 
                  Larry Osborne, 22, was ''still in shock'' after his acquittal 
                  yesterday, his lawyer said. He spent two years on death row 
                  after being convicted of the December 1997 murders of an 
                  elderly Whitley County couple. 
            Larry Osborne -- the youngest person on Kentucky's death row -- was 
            acquitted yesterday at his retrial in the December 1997 murders of 
            an elderly Whitley County couple. He was freed immediately and left 
            the courthouse with his father. 
            Osborne, 22, whose 1998 conviction was overturned last year by the 
            state Supreme Court, becomes the first person in Kentucky on death 
            row to be found innocent since the state reinstituted the death 
            penalty in 1976. 
            ''We are very happy,'' his lawyer, Gail Robinson, said yesterday. 
            ''The jury did the right thing.'' 
            Whitley Commonwealth's Attorney Allen Trimble could not be reached 
            for comment late yesterday. There was no answer in numerous calls to
            his home. 
            Osborne, who had been held since his arrest on Dec. 31, 1997, when 
            he was 17, spent two years on death row. 
            He walked out of the courtroom a free man yesterday, Robinson said. 
            She said he broke down when the jury returned the innocent verdict 
            yesterday afternoon after about four hours of deliberation. 
            ''He just sat there sobbing,'' Robinson said. ''He's still in 
            shock.'' 
            Osborne was not available for comment yesterday. Robinson said he 
            was with his father and was still working out plans on where to 
            stay. 
            Osborne won a retrial after the Supreme Court ruled last year that 
            Whitley Circuit Judge Paul Braden was wrong to allow into evidence 
            at the first trial a statement made by a witness who later died, 
            Osborne's alleged 15-year-old accomplice. That witness, Joe Reid, 
            drowned in a swimming accident five months before Osborne's first 
            trial. 
            Death penalty opponents said yesterday that the case underscores 
            their argument that innocent people risk conviction and execution in
            Kentucky. 
            ''Huge, huge mistakes -- like innocent people going to death row -- 
            do occur,'' Robinson said. 
            The Rev. Patrick Delahanty, chairman of the Kentucky Coalition to 
            Abolish the Death Penalty, said it's an example of how the system 
            fails people like Osborne. 
            ''This guy was innocent and they put him on trial, they didn't have 
            the evidence and they convicted him,'' Delahanty said. ''That's the 
            system in Kentucky.'' 
            Howard Mann, who helped prosecute Osborne in the first trial, said 
            Trimble had a difficult case to make without the testimony of Reid. 
            But he said Trimble was able to present new evidence at the retrial,
            including a pair of pliers found at Osborne's home. The victims' son
            testified he had left the pliers at his parents' house the day 
            before they were killed. 
            Mann said the new evidence ''didn't compel the jury to go either 
            way.'' 
            Frankfort lawyer Kevin McNally, Robinson's husband and a national 
            expert on capital cases who represents people appealing the death 
            penalty, said Osborne becomes the 102nd person on death row 
            nationwide to be acquitted since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated 
            the death penalty in 1976. 
            ''I think what it means is that there are so many questionable cases
            on death row,'' McNally said. 
            Delahanty and other death penalty opponents have long pushed 
            unsuccessfully for a Kentucky law to ban the death penalty for 
            defendants who were juveniles at the time of the crime. Yesterday, 
            they said Osborne would have been spared a death sentence if 
            Kentucky had such a law. 
            ''We shouldn't have a death penalty -- particularly for 
            teen-agers,'' Robinson said. 
            Osborne was charged with the Dec. 14, 1997, slayings of Sam 
            Davenport, 82, and his wife, Lillian Davenport, 76, after a break-in
            at the home where the couple had lived for 46 years. The prosecutor 
            said someone disabled the elderly couple, possibly hitting them on 
            the head, then set the house on fire. 
            The Davenports died of smoke inhalation. 
            Osborne became a suspect after his mother, Pat Osborne, called 
            police to report that her son had heard breaking glass as he and 
            Reid rode past the Davenport home on a motorbike, according to the 
            court record and testimony at the first trial. 
            Authorities said the break-in occurred on the evening of Dec. 13 and
            the murders early on Dec. 14; Pat Osborne called police around 1 
            a.m. on Dec. 14. The Davenports died around 12:30 a.m. on Dec. 14, 
            court records said. 
            On Dec. 31, police began questioning Reid, who insisted as he had 
            previously that neither he nor Osborne had anything to do with the 
            crime. He stuck to that story for most of the interview. 
            But at the end of a four-hour interview, Reid changed his story and 
            told police that Osborne had committed the crime while Reid watched 
            from outside, according to court records. Police told him afterward 
            they would assure prosecutors that Reid had cooperated with them. 
            ''Is this going to get me out of all this stuff?'' Reid asked, 
            according to court records. 
            Osborne was arrested the same night. 
            Before Reid could testify at trial, he drowned while swimming in 
            Jellico, Tenn. His death was ruled accidental. 
            But the prosecution presented Reid's statement at trial anyway, over
            objections of defense lawyers who argued it was wrong to present 
            evidence from a dead witness who couldn't be cross-examined. They 
            also argued that Reid's statement was full of inconsistencies. 
            Osborne was retried this time without Reid's statement. Robinson 
            said that substantially weakened the prosecution's case. 
            She said Osborne took the stand at the five-day trial and testified 
            on his own behalf. 
            ''He said what he's said from day one,'' Robinson said. ''He said, 
            'I didn't have anything to do with this.' '' 
            Staff writer Joseph Gerth contributed to this story. 
            ^^  Back to top
             Subscribe!
            Click here to get the C-J delivered to your door each morning. 
             
                  Home · News · Sports · Business · Features · Louisville Scene 
                  · Classifieds · Jobs · Cars · Homes · Marketplace · Contact Us
                  · Search 
      Copyright 2002 The Courier-Journal.
      Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service (updated
      8/7/2001).
      Send questions and comments to The Webmaster.
       

Metadata

Resource Type:
Document
Rights:
Date Uploaded:
November 12, 2024

Using these materials

Access:
The archives are open to the public and anyone is welcome to visit and view the collections.
Collection restrictions:
Access to this collection is unrestricted.
Collection terms of access:
The Department of Special Collections and Archives is eager to hear from any copyright owners who are not properly identified so that appropriate information may be provided in the future.

Access options

Ask an Archivist

Ask a question or schedule an individualized meeting to discuss archival materials and potential research needs.

Schedule a Visit

Archival materials can be viewed in-person in our reading room. We recommend making an appointment to ensure materials are available when you arrive.