THE 36™ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE SYSTEM DYNAMICS SOCIETY
REYKJAVIK, ICELAND
Vision Modeling and Assessment Using System
Dynamics
Application to a Sustainable Energy System Based upon Power-to-Gas
Johannes Halbe, McGill University
Stefan Gausling, University of Osnabruck
Jan Adamowski, McGill University
0:00-
Problem Statement
¢ Visions of the future depend upon different
values or interests
* Unclear visions and goals can render policy
development and implementation ineffective
* Vision modeling allows for the assessment of
VISIONS
- internal consistency (e.g., existence of trade-offs)
- plausibility (are realistic constraints considered?)
- desirability (are sustainability benefits reached?)
0:30-
& Approach or Dynamic Hypothesis
Vision Analysis and Assessment Framework
Steps of the VDA Framework Methods used as part of the
VDA Framework
Vision Design
Step 1.1: Definition of needs, requirements Functional organization
and functions analysis
Step 1.2: Organizational analysis of
‘ ‘ wsystem Organization“
alternative system designs
Step 1.3: Structural analysis of system Causal Loop Diagrams (CLDs)
designs (optional)
»system Structure“
Vision Assessment |
Step 2.1: Dynamic modeling and sas System
assessment of system designs ee Dynamics
a »System
Step 2.2: Model testing and validation »System States Processes“
2:00-
System
——— '
G2) Progress and Insights to Share
— 4
Greenhouse gas emissions Space Requirements
power supply [Mio ta] Renewables [km2]
* Application to the vis 2
of a fully renewable ~ ad | ——
energy system 2100 antl ™ Pix 3000 RE+
(power, heat, mobility) ou. = i
electricity [€/kWh]
0,00 0,05 0.10
™ Pix 4000 RE
| — ue © Without PX R2
2050 ee 2050 ™ PIX 3000 RE R2
1 2100
* Model testing — - —
0,00 0,05 0,10 0,15 0,20
Approaches for handling uncerta
. Sensitivity Model-to-
IA framework Scenario analysis (global model Expert
analysis . assessment
/ local) analysis
— Statistical uncertainty + ++ ++
$ Scenario uncertainty + ++ ++
- Recognized ignorance + + ++
Model boundary ++ + ++
7 Model structure + + + +
2 Model technique + ++ +
8 Input variables + ae
Parameters + + +
Model outcomes + +H ++ +