System Dynamics does an excellent peer review of articles. This year, eeing the reviewers' comments and suggestions online was especially welcomed feedback. The additional benefit of initiating a dialog with the reviewers was a bonus. However, there is always room for improvement. Your thoughts and ideas are welcomed to help us continue to improve our peer review process. Please consider joining a dialog at our Boston meeting to further explore the peer review process. Your presence and ideas are welcome. Some thoughts for consideration are as follows: 1. Need the peer review process start and end so abruptly? Should the reviewer and writer continue the dialog post the society meeting if mutually agreed? Should a reviewer mentor this process? 2. Are there submissions for review that could be enhanced and offered to other venues for publication, and thus improve recognition for the System Dynamics Society? Should a reviewer mentor this process? 3. Could a practitioners develop a business methodology from theory presented in a peer reviewed paper, or could academics proved theoretical underpinnings for a practical approach presented? Should a reviewer facilitate this process? If you are interested in discussing these peer review ideas or others, please consider joining an informal meeting!

This is the whole item.

Date created

• 2005 July 17-2005 July 21

Type

• Document

Processing Activity

• Processing documentation available at: https://wiki.albany.edu/display/SCA/Processing+Ingested+Digital+Files

License

• Creative Commons BY-NC-ND Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International

  
  Contact Us for questions or additional rights.

ITEM CONTEXT

Part of

cc5bb0ac12a5b68b26b1583548898dae

Scope and Contents

Part of

3c582e6f5cf305ef0030c7471b499022

Scope and Contents

Part of

23d738ba88f8333bc39725f9cb5bd0b8

Scope and Contents

Collection

System Dynamic Society Records

Scope and Contents

Collecting area

• This collection is part of the University Archives