The paper is organized in three parts. It begins with a brief review of the substantive exchange of views in the case, including the Company’s position, the Attorney General’s position, and the analyses and counter analyses presented in support of these positions. In Part Two, the paper describes the participants and the schedule of the hearings. It is argued that the rapid pace of these hearings and the background of the participants are important determinants of usefulness of System Dynamics models under adversary proceedings. The third part of the paper concludes with a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of system dynamics under fast paced, adversary conditions.

This is the whole item.

Date created

• 1981

Type

• Document

Processing Activity

• Processing documentation available at: https://wiki.albany.edu/display/SCA/Processing+Ingested+Digital+Files

License

• Creative Commons BY-NC-ND Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International

  
  Contact Us for questions or additional rights.

ITEM CONTEXT

Part of

e8eac154b3129692f26c222dbc2c9466

Scope and Contents

Part of

4a97153f59047c298f3bcd6b15c284f5

Scope and Contents

Part of

23d738ba88f8333bc39725f9cb5bd0b8

Scope and Contents

Collection

System Dynamic Society Records

Scope and Contents

Collecting area

• This collection is part of the University Archives