While the informal modelling procedure of system dynamics qualifies as scientific according to the definitions of the epistemological literature, the application of this procedure may create models of phenomena that provide few clues to the design of change. Policy design exercises based on such models may often end with a moral statement about what should be done by the organization as a whole instead of providing motivational instruments through which its various members realize evolutionary change. Unfortunately, a change prescribed by a moral statement can only be realized by a powerful intervention by an outside agent which is, if at all possible to implement, often dysfunctional. This paper attempts to define heuristics for the construction of models that may lead to viable designs of evolutionary change. A model is viewed as instrument for understanding a problem not as a source of design. Guidelines for partitioning complex problems into multiple models are discussed. Models containing conservative systems capable of generating a large number of time variant patterns, which are in reality separated by time and location, appear to be sound instruments for facilitating the design of change.

This is the whole item.

Date created

• 1988

Type

• Document

Processing Activity

• Processing documentation available at: https://wiki.albany.edu/display/SCA/Processing+Ingested+Digital+Files

License

• Creative Commons BY-NC-ND Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International

  
  Contact Us for questions or additional rights.

ITEM CONTEXT

Part of

ff3ca29802c9b5ed0bd77a0a9e76375a

Scope and Contents

Part of

74bc8d76f7112f877dcc1bed073089e6

Scope and Contents

Part of

23d738ba88f8333bc39725f9cb5bd0b8

Scope and Contents

Collection

System Dynamic Society Records

Scope and Contents

Collecting area

• This collection is part of the University Archives